Updated systematic review and meta-analysis of the effects of n−3 long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids on depressed mood123

https://doi.org/10.3945/ajcn.2009.28313Get rights and content
Under an Elsevier user license
open archive

Background: The debate over a role for n−3 long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids (n−3 PUFAs) in depressed mood continues.

Objective: The objective was to update a previous systematic review and meta-analysis of published randomized controlled trials investigating the effects of n−3 PUFAs on depressed mood and to explore potential sources of heterogeneity.

Design: Eight databases were searched for trials that randomly assigned participants to receive n−3 PUFAs/fish, measured depressed mood, used human participants, and included a comparison group up to April 2009.

Results: Thirty-five randomized controlled trials were identified; 17 were not included in the previous review. The pooled standardized difference in mean outcome of the 29 trials that provided data to allow pooling (fixed-effects model) was 0.10 SD (95% CI: 0.02, 0.17) in those who received n−3 PUFAs compared with placebo, with strong evidence of heterogeneity (I2 = 65%, P < 0.01). The presence of funnel plot asymmetry suggested that publication bias was a likely source of this heterogeneity. Depressive symptom severity and participant diagnosis also explained some of the observed heterogeneity. Greater effects of n−3 PUFAs were found in individuals with more-severe depressive symptoms. In trials that enrolled individuals with a diagnosed depressive disorder, the combined mean difference was 0.41 (95% CI: 0.26, 0.55), although evidence of heterogeneity was also found (I2 = 71%). In trials that enrolled individuals without a depressive diagnosis, no beneficial effects of n−3 PUFAs were found (largest combined mean difference: 0.22; 95% CI: −0.01, 0.44; I2 = 0%).

Conclusions: Trial evidence of the effects of n−3 PUFAs on depressed mood has increased but remains difficult to summarize because of considerable heterogeneity. The evidence available provides some support of a benefit of n−3 PUFAs in individuals with diagnosed depressive illness but no evidence of any benefit in individuals without a diagnosis of depressive illness.

Cited by (0)

1

From the School of Psychology, Queen’s University, Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom (KMA); the Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom (PJR); and the Department of Oral and Dental Science, Bristol, United Kingdom (ARN).

2

Supported by Queen’s University, Belfast, United Kingdom, and the University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.

3

Address correspondence to KM Appleton, School of Psychology, Queen’s University, Belfast, 18-30 Malone Road, Belfast, BT9 5BP, United Kingdom. E-mail: [email protected].