Sulfur-bearing Molecules in Orion KL

, , , , , , , and

Published 2019 November 1 © 2019. The American Astronomical Society. All rights reserved.
, , Citation Gan Luo et al 2019 ApJ 885 82 DOI 10.3847/1538-4357/ab45ef

Download Article PDF
DownloadArticle ePub

You need an eReader or compatible software to experience the benefits of the ePub3 file format.

0004-637X/885/1/82

Abstract

We present an observational study of the sulfur (S)-bearing species toward Orion KL at 1.3 mm by combining ALMA and IRAM-30 m single-dish data. At a linear resolution of ∼800 au and a velocity resolution of 1 km s−1, we have identified 79 molecular lines from six S-bearing species. In these S-bearing species, we found a clear dichotomy between carbon–sulfur compounds and carbon-free S-bearing species for various characteristics, e.g., of line profiles, spatial morphology, and molecular abundances with respect to H2. Lines from the carbon–sulfur compounds (i.e., OCS, 13CS, and H2CS) exhibit spatial distributions concentrated around the continuum peaks and extended to the south ridge. The full width at half maximum (FWHM) linewidth of these molecular lines is in the range of 2 ∼11 km s−1. The molecular abundances of OCS and H2CS decrease slightly from the cold (∼68 K) to the hot (∼176 K) regions. In contrast, lines from the carbon-free S-bearing species (i.e., SO2, 34SO, and H2S) are spatially more extended to the northeast of mm4, exhibiting broader FWHM line widths (15 ∼ 26 km s−1). The molecular abundances of carbon-free S-bearing species increase by over an order of magnitude as the temperature increase from 50 to 100 K. In particular, 34SO/34SO2 and OCS/SO2 are enhanced from the warmer regions (>100 K) to the colder regions (∼50 K). Such enhancements are consistent with the transformation of SO2 at warmer regions and the influence of shocks.

Export citation and abstract BibTeX RIS

1. Introduction

Sulfur (S)-bearing molecules (e.g., H2S, SO, SO2, CS, OCS, and H2CS) have been detected in various star-forming environments, e.g., infrared dark clouds (Turner et al. 1973; Ragan et al. 2006; Vasyunina et al. 2011), hot molecular cores (Blake et al. 1987; Charnley 1997; Tercero et al. 2010; Feng et al. 2015), and shocked regions associated with protostellar objects (Wakelam et al. 2005; Podio et al. 2015; Holdship et al. 2016; Girart et al. 2017). Given that the relative abundance ratios of S-bearing species are highly sensitive to gas temperature and density (Viti et al. 2004; Wakelam et al. 2011), they have been used in previous studies to understand the physical environments of several molecular clouds (e.g., Pineau des Forets et al. 1993; Bachiller & Pérez Gutiérrez 1997; Charnley 1997; Hatchell et al. 1998; van der Tak et al. 2003; Wakelam et al. 2011; Esplugues et al. 2014; Feng et al. 2015). However, the feasibility of using these species to precisely diagnose the evolutionary stage of a particular star-forming region is still questionable. The main reason is that the main sulfur carriers on the grain mantle are still uncertain. It has long been proposed that H2S (Charnley 1997) and/or OCS (Hatchell et al. 1998; van der Tak et al. 2003) are candidate sulfur grain reservoirs, forming SO, SO2, and other S-bearing molecules in the gas phase (Esplugues et al. 2014; Podio et al. 2014; Holdship et al. 2016). However, OCS and SO2 have been detected or tentatively detected in the interstellar ices (Palumbo et al. 1995; Boogert et al. 1997), and H2S has not yet been detected in the solid phase.

The Orion Kleinmann–Low Nebula (Orion KL) is a good site for investigating the physical and chemical evolution of high-mass star-forming regions. It is the closest high-mass star-forming region (437 ± 19 pc; Hirota et al. 2007), and it exhibits rich molecular line emission at (sub)millimeter wavelengths (Blake et al. 1987; Tercero et al. 2010; Crockett et al. 2014; Feng et al. 2015; Frayer et al. 2015; Pagani et al. 2017; Peng et al. 2017, 2019). Observationally, this region is composed of four major components, the hot core, the compact ridge, the plateau, and the extended ridge, that are spatially and kinematically different (e.g., Blake et al. 1987; Schilke et al. 2001; Tercero et al. 2010; Crockett et al. 2014). The hot core is characterized by molecular lines with υlsr ≈ 3–5 km s−1 and Δυ ≈ 5–10 km s−1 (Blake et al. 1987; Tercero et al. 2010). The hot core is a hot (Tkin ≥ 150 K) and dense (≥107cm−3) gas clump, which bridges the evolution between the natal molecular cloud and the inner newly formed star (e.g., Source I, Hirota et al. 2017; Báez-Rubio et al. 2018). Although the central heating source(s) is still under debate (de Vicente et al. 2002; Wang et al. 2010; Goddi et al. 2011; Orozco-Aguilera et al. 2017; Wright & Plambeck 2017), it evaporates the molecules from the ice mantle to the gas phase, and changes the chemistry on a relatively short timescale (∼104 ∼ 105 yr) (Bernasconi & Maeder 1996). Previous studies suggested that the Orion hot core is rich in nitrogen-bearing complex molecules (Caselli et al. 1993; Peng et al. 2017). The compact ridge is less dense (≥106 cm−1) and has lower gas temperature (80–140 K) than the hot core (Blake et al. 1987). The central velocity is ∼7–8 km s−1, and the full width at half maximum (FWHM) linewidth is ∼3–5 km s−1. Oxygen-bearing molecules are more abundant in the compact ridge than in the hot core (Tercero et al. 2018). The plateau harbors two outflows, with a low-velocity bipolar flow (LVF, 18 km s−1) along the northeast–southwest direction and a high-velocity outflow (HVF, 30–100 km s−1) along the northwest–southeast direction. A larger linewidth (≥20–25 km s−1) was detected toward the plateau than that of the compact ridge (Plambeck et al. 2009; Zapata et al. 2011, 2012; Bally et al. 2017; Hirota et al. 2017). The extended ridge is the most quiescent region in Orion KL, with a kinetic temperature of 50–60 K (Blake et al. 1987; Tercero et al. 2010). Molecular line observations in the millimeter band indicated a υlsr of ∼9 km s−1 and a linewidth of ∼3–4 km s−1 toward this region.

The Atacama Large Millimeter Array (ALMA) is now providing fruitful archival data, with broad spectral coverage of S-bearing lines at high sensitivity and high angular resolution, allowing us to perform a detailed study of S-bearing chemistry toward the nearest high-mass star-forming region, Orion KL. In this paper, we combine archival ALMA data with IRAM-30 m observations toward Orion KL at 1.3 mm in Section 2. In Section 3, we identify the S-bearing lines and study their line profiles toward different substructures at a linear resolution of ∼800 au. We discuss the chemical relations of different S-bearing species according to their spatial variations in Section 4. The conclusions are summarized in Section 5.

2. Observations

2.1. ALMA Observations

The ALMA archive data were obtained from ALMA science verification8 (SV) data in band 6 (project ID 2011.0.00009.SV). The observations were performed on 2012 January 20, with baselines ranging from 17 to 265 m. The phase-tracking center was at R.A. = 05h35m14fs35 and decl. = −05°22'35farcs0. The ALMA spectral coverage is from 213.719 to 246.619 GHz, with a spectral resolution of 0.488 MHz (corresponding to ∼0.7 km s−1 at 230 GHz). Bandpass and flux calibration were performed with Callisto. Quasar J0607-085 was observed for phase calibration. Continuum subtraction was performed, and the images were reduced with the MIRIAD (Sault et al. 1995) software. The images were deconvolved with natural weighting using the Clean algorithm. The synthesized beam size is 1farcs64 × 1farcs20 at 230 GHz. The 1σ root mean square (rms) noise level of the continuum and lines are ∼10 mJy beam−1 and 30 mJy beam−1 per channel, respectively. Figure 1 shows the 1.3 mm continuum map from the ALMA-only data. Adopting the same nomenclature as that given by Wu et al. (2014), we label the brightest condensation as the hot core and the resolved condensations as mm2-mm7.

Figure 1.

Figure 1. Substructures resolved by ALMA-only continuum observations at 1.3 mm at a spatial resolution of 1farcs64 × 1farcs20. The black contours show the continuum emission at the 5σ, 15σ, 30σ, 50σ, 100σ, and 200σ levels with 1σ = 3.9 mJy beam−1. The green crosses denote the continuum peaks. The black open circle indicates the ALMA primary beam (30''). The synthetic beam is indicated in the bottom right by the blue solid ellipse.

Standard image High-resolution image

2.2. Single-dish Observation with IRAM

The ALMA-only observations filtered out ∼30%–50% of the extended emission in general compared to the 1.3 mm line emission detected with the IRAM-30 m single-dish observations (see the observational details in Feng et al. 2015). Therefore, we convert the IRAM-30 m data into the MIRIAD data format and use the following procedure to combine the ALMA and the IRAM-30 m data.

First, with the task UVMODEL, model visibility data from the single-dish spectral line are generated in the UV plane. The ALMA visibilities (red dot) and the IRAM-30 m visibilities (black dot) in the amplitude-UV-distance plane are shown in Figure 2 as an example. Then, using the Clean algorithm with natural weighting, the ALMA and IRAM-30 m visibilities are combined into deconvolved images containing large-scale emission (see Figure 3 for an example of the complementation of missing flux). The combined data cube has a synthesized beam of 1farcs86 × 1farcs53 (P.A. = −19°) in the upper sideband and 2farcs03 × 1farcs76 (P.A. = −12fdg6) in the lower sideband. The rms noise level of spectral lines is ∼60 mJy beam−1 per km s−1.

Figure 2.

Figure 2. Amplitude as a function of the projected baseline. ALMA data are shown in red and IRAM-30 m data in black.

Standard image High-resolution image
Figure 3.

Figure 3. Sample spectra extracted from the peak position toward the hot core. The ALMA-only data are plotted in black and show missing flux in the shape of artificial absorption, and the ALMA-30 m combined data are plotted in red. The SO2 lines are identified using XCLASS, and the quantum numbers of the unblended transitions are labeled.

Standard image High-resolution image

3. Results

3.1. Line Identification

The broad bandwidth of the combined data set covers multiple transitions from a large number of S-bearing species, allowing us to perform an unbiased S-bearing study by excluding excitation effects. Adopting the eXtended CASA Line Analysis Software Suite (XCLASS, Möller et al. 2017), we are able to identify all lines of a particular species in our data simultaneously, based on molecular databases such as the Cologne Database for Molecular Spectroscopy (CDMS; Müller et al. 2005) or the database from from the Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL; Pickett et al. 1998).

The spectra extracted from the peak position toward each substructure are shown in Figure 4. The hot core contains the largest number of line detections, showing more intensive emission than the remainder of Orion KL. Therefore, using XCLASS, we identified 74 lines from 20 S-bearing isotopologues toward the hot core (listed in Table 1), including 13 lines of SO2, 14 lines of 34SO2, 8 lines of 33SO2, 9 lines of OS17O, 9 lines of OS18O, 4 lines of SO, 1 line of 34SO, 1 line of 33SO, 1 line of S18O, 1 line of H2S, 1 line of ${{\rm{H}}}_{2}^{34}{\rm{S}}$, 1 line of ${{\rm{H}}}_{2}^{33}{\rm{S}}$, 2 lines of OCS, 1 line of OC33S, 2 lines of O13CS, 1 line of 18OCS, 1 line of 13CS, 1 line of H2CS, 2 lines of H2C34S, and 1 line of ${{\rm{H}}}_{2}{{\rm{C}}}^{33}{\rm{S}}$.

3.2. Synthetic Spectrum Fitting

For each species, assuming that all lines of that species are under local thermodynamic equilibrium (LTE), we can use the Modeling and Analysis Generic Interface for eXternal numerical codes (MAGIX; Möller et al. 2013) package to perform the fitting process. Therein, a synthetic spectrum is modeled from an isothermal object in one dimension by taking the optical depth, line blending, source size, velocity, and linewidth into account.

Using MAGIX, we fit the synthetic spectra of all 20 isotopologues toward each substructure. The input parameters of a particular molecule in MAGIX include the source size (in arcsecond), the rotational temperature Trot (K), the molecular total column density Ntot (cm−2), the FWHM linewidth Δυ (km s−1), and the central velocity υlsr (km s−1). These input parameters are assumed to be the same for different transitions as initial guesses. By minimizing χ2 in the given parameter space, MAGIX yields optimized results as output. For the isotopologues of the same species, we assume that all lines have the same centroid velocity. Moreover, we treat cases of line blending in which two or more possible lines contribute more than 5% of the observed intensity. An optimal fit is obtained by using three fitting algorithms, genetic, Levenberg–Marquardt, and errorestim-ins. Figure 4 shows an example of the synthetic spectra produced by MAGIX fitting to the lines in the frequency range of 215,380–217,218 MHz toward individual substructures.

Figure 4.

Figure 4. 

Spectral line survey for different regions. The six subfigures show the spectra and optical depths of the identified molecules from six positions. For each subfigure, the black curve in the upper panel shows the combined data, and the red curve shows the model spectra obtained with XCLASS. The red curve in the lower panel shows the optical depth of each line. (An extended version of this figure is available.)

Standard image High-resolution image

    Analyzing the fitting results, we obtain the following results:

    • 1.  
      In general, all the S-bearing species identified in our data set are well fit, exhibiting small optical depths (Figure 1). One exception is SO2 toward the hot core, mm2, mm3, and mm4, where the fits for some low-J lines indicate optical depths greater than 1. These lines may originate from different temperature components (i.e., from both the central protostellar objects and the outer envelope). Photons from the inner hot component will be absorbed by molecules from the colder envelope, which will lead to overfitting of the low-J lines. (See the similar results given in Ahmadi et al. 2018, Appendix B). In such cases, we only use the high-J lines for the fitting process. The exclusion of the optically thick (low-J) lines will yield more accurate rotational temperatures.
    • 2.  
      The LTE condition seems to be a reasonable assumption for the substructures we study here. Given that a successful fitting of a particular species with MAGIX requests at least three confirmed transitions and that SO2 is the only species for which we detected more than three unblended lines toward all substructures (see the example of its unblended lines toward the hot core in Figure 3), we can use its fitting results to validate the assumptions in our source environment when using MAGIX. These SO2 lines in our data set cover an Eu range of 19.03–1126.34 K. The rotation temperature Trot of SO2 from the fitting results (Table 2) is shown in Figure 5. We found that SO2 exhibits the highest Trot toward the hot core region (∼176 K) and the lowest Trot toward the mm7 region (∼68 K). The Trot of SO2 is ∼106 K toward mm2, mm3, mm4, and mm5, without significant variations. This result is consistent with Feng et al. 2015. At such high temperature, the critical densities of these lines are 104 ∼ 106 cm−3, which is less than the number density of the substructures (107 ∼ 108 cm−3). For the rest of the S-bearing species (given in Table 1), we assume that their excitation temperatures toward individual substructures are the same as those of SO2. Thus, the LTE condition is also a good approximation for estimating their column densities.
    • 3.  
      The S-bearing lines in our data set seem to show different line profiles. Figure 6 shows line profiles of representative lines for each species. Figure 7 gives the statistical FWHM linewidth of these species toward individual substructures. Most lines from the carbon-free S-bearing species (including SO2, 34SO2, 34SO, and H2S) exhibit a single peak toward the hot core, with a central velocity of ∼7 km s−1. Those lines have large line wings toward mm2, mm3, mm4, and mm5. Due to overlap of different velocity components along the line-of-sight, the line profiles of H2S show multiple peaks toward mm2, mm3, mm4, and mm5. The FWHM linewidth toward the hot core is 7–14 km s−1 and toward mm7 is 3–8 km s−1 (The FWHM linewidth of 34SO2 is 15 km s−1, due to its weak emission), which is significantly narrower than the values for the rest of the substructures (12 ∼ 26 km s−1). Lines from the carbon–sulfur compounds (including OCS, 13CS, and H2CS) exhibit a single velocity component toward each substructure, with a central velocity in the range of 7 ∼ 9 km s−1. However, they exhibit a narrower FWHM line width toward mm2 to mm7 (2 ∼ 8 km s−1) than that of the hot core (7 ∼ 11 km s−1). Since Orion KL is a complex region with multiple outflows, bringing layers of time-dependent shocks (Zapata et al. 2011; Crockett et al. 2014; Bally et al. 2017), the varying line widths of different S-bearing groups may be the result of components with different chemical ages.

    Figure 5.

    Figure 5. Rotational temperatures of SO2 toward the six substructures derived using MAGIX. The optimal parameters for all S-bearing species are listed in Table 2.

    Standard image High-resolution image
    Figure 6.

    Figure 6. Line profiles of SO2 (176,12–185,13), 34SO2 (143,11–142,12), 34SO (65–54), OCS (18–17), O13CS (18–17), 13CS (5–4), H2S (22,0–21,1), and H2CS (71,7–61,6) in different regions.

    Standard image High-resolution image
    Figure 7.

    Figure 7. Line widths of SO2 (176,12–185,13), 34SO2 (143,11–142,12), 34SO (65–54), OCS (18–17), O13CS (18–17), 13CS (5–4), H2S (22,0–21,1), and H2CS (71,7–61,6) toward six peak positions. The x-axis represents the rotational temperatures toward the hot core to mm7.

    Standard image High-resolution image

    3.3. Line Spatial Distribution

    Integrating the intensity of the representative lines for each species in the velocity range of 0–16 km s−1, we present the spatial distribution maps of six species in Figure 8. The carbon-free S-bearing species and the carbon–sulfur compounds exhibit different spatial extents. The extended emissions of the carbon-free species cover the region from northeast mm4 down to the south mm2. The extended emissions of the carbon–sulfur compounds do not cover the northern mm4 but instead shift to the southern mm7, exhibiting a "heart-shaped" morphology. This result indicates that these two groups of S-bearing species are chemically different, tracing different gas.

    Figure 8.

    Figure 8. Integrated intensity maps of the representative lines from six species over the velocity range from 0 to 16 km s−1. The gray map in the background shows the ALMA-only continuum emission. The peak positions of the continuum emission are marked with green crosses. Black contours show the line emission from the ALMA-30 m combination, starting from 5σ and increasing by a step of 5σ. The transition of each molecule is given in the lower-left corner of each panel.

    Standard image High-resolution image

    Moreover, when checking the line spatial distribution maps channel by channel, we also note that a ring-like structure appears on the line maps of carbon-free S-bearing species (SO2, 34SO, H2S) in the velocity range of 10–15 km s−1 (Figure 9). This ring, centered at R.A. = 05h35m14fs235 and decl. = −05°22'32farcs7, has a radius of ∼5'' in the plane of the sky. The dust emission peaks for the hot core, mm2, mm3, and mm5 are at the edge of the ring, suggesting that the carbon-free S-bearing species may be excited by shocks from the OMC1 explosion 500 yr ago (Plambeck & Wright 2016; Bally et al. 2017).

    Figure 9.

    Figure 9. Channel maps of H2S over a velocity range of 10–15 km s−1. The gray map on the background shows the ALMA-only continuum emission. The peak positions of the continuum emission are marked with green crosses. Black contours show the line emission from the ALMA-30 m combination, starting from 5% of the emission peak and increasing by a step of 5%. The red circle indicates the ring-like structure.

    Standard image High-resolution image

    Using XCLASSMapfit (with the same assumptions and algorithms as MAGIX), we fit the Trot and column density maps by modeling the synthetic spectra toward all pixels. From the map fittings to SO2 lines (Figure 10), we note a significant temperature and column density gradient from the hottest (100 ∼180 K) and densest (7.8 × 1017 cm−2) center of the hot core, through the warm (100 ∼ 120 K) mm2-mm5, and to the most distant and coolest (∼60 K, 8 × 1015 cm−2) mm7. This gradient may be the result of radiative pumping from being externally heated (De Buizer et al. 2012; Orozco-Aguilera et al. 2017) or shocks (Zapata et al. 2011; Wright & Plambeck 2017).

    Figure 10.

    Figure 10. Rotational temperature (left) and column density (right) maps of SO2 obtained using XCLASSMapfit. The molecular lines we used for synthetic fitting are SO2 J = 42,2–31,3, 115,7–124,8, 161,15–152,14, 163,13–162,14, 176,12–185,13, and 227,15–236,18. The continuum peaks are labeled as green crosses. Regions outside the pixel value corresponding to a 3σ detection of the most extended integrated intensity of SO2 lines are masked out.

    Standard image High-resolution image

    4. Discussion

    At a velocity resolution of 1 km s−1 and a linear resolution of ∼800 au, two groups of S-bearing species exhibit different kinematics and spatial distributions toward the Orion KL complex. These variations indicate that carbon-free S-bearing species and carbon–sulfur compounds may be able to distinguish substructures that have different physicochemical processes in Orion KL.

    4.1. Error Budget

    A precise measurement of the molecular column density is key to study the chemical variations in different species. Under the LTE assumption, the column density of SO2 is obtained by fitting multiple optically thin lines using MAGIX (as stated in Section 3.2). Column densities of the other S-bearing species are estimated by using the SO2 rotation temperature as the gas temperature. Therefore, to test if these assumptions are reasonable, we derive the relative abundance ratios between the 32S-/34S-/33S-isotopologues as well as the 12C-/13C-isotopologues (Table 3). We compare the values with the canonic 32S/34S, 34S/33S, and 12C/13C isotopic ratios, respectively (Anders & Grevesse 1989; Langer & Penzias 1990, 1993; Chin et al. 1996; Lucas & Liszt 1998; Persson et al. 2007; Tercero et al. 2010).

    We find that the average relative abundance ratio of 32SO2/34SO2 toward Orion KL is 20 ± 4, which is consistent with previous observations toward Orion KL (e..g, 23 ± 7 from 32SO2/34SO2, Persson et al. 2007; 20 ± 6 from OC32S/OC34S, Tercero et al. 2010). The result is consistent with the solar value of 23 (Anders & Grevesse 1989), the local diffuse ISM value of 19 ± 8 from C32S/C34S from absorption observations (Lucas & Liszt 1998), and the galactic average value of 24 ± 5 from C32S/C34S (Chin et al. 1996). The average relative abundance ratio of H2C32S/H2C34S is 53 ± 7 in our study, which is slightly greater than the value of 32S/34S from 32SO2/34SO2 and a previous study by Tercero et al. (2010). The ratio of H2C32S/H2C34S toward the hot core is 19 ± 8, which is consistent with previous results. We notice that the linewidth of H2C34S is less than 2 km s−1 (2 channels in the spectra) toward mm2, mm3, mm4, and mm5, which means that the column density of H2C34S may be underestimated. Thus, the 32S/34S ratio derived from 32SO2/34SO2 (20 ± 4) should be more reasonable.

    The average abundance ratio of 34S/33S derived from 32SO/34SO is 6 ± 1 toward Orion KL, which is consistent with the same molecular pair of Esplugues et al. (2013; 6 ± 3), Tercero et al. (2010; ∼5), and Persson et al. (2007; 4.9). Our result is consistent with the solar value of 5.6 (Anders & Grevesse 1989) and the galactic average value of 6 ± 1 from C34S/C33S (Chin et al. 1996). Moreover, the derived average 12C/13C ratio (38 ± 9 from O12CS/O13CS) is consistent with the previous work of Tercero et al. (2010; 45 ± 20 from O12CS/O13CS) and Persson et al. (2007; 57 ± 14 from 12CH3OH/13CH3OH). Langer & Penzias (1990, 1993) found a galactic gradient in the 12C/13C isotopic ratio, which increases from 30 in the inner galaxy (5 kpc) to 70 at 12 kpc. The 12C/13C ratio they derived from 12C18O/13C18O is 63 ± 6 toward Orion A, which is greater than our result.

    From the above test, we believe that the assumptions of LTE in XCLASS and gas temperature in this work are reasonable. Therefore, the chemical variations between different species can be directly indicated by comparing their relative abundances at the same position.

    4.2. Chemical Segregation of the Carbon-free S-bearing Species and Carbon–Sulfur Compounds

    In this work, we estimate the relative abundance (column density ratio) of S-bearing species with respect to H2. Instead of using continuum emission and the gas-to-dust ratio, we use C18O to estimate the H2 column density for the following reasons: (1) The emission lines at 1 mm are so rich toward Orion KL that it is difficult to define the "line-free" part for the continuum. Moreover, we do not have the bolometric data to compensate for the missing flux of the ALMA-only continuum observations. Therefore, we do not know how significantly the dust continuum we are currently using is overestimated or underestimated. (2) The extended emission from the ALMA C18O (2-1) data is complemented using IRAM-30 m data, and our MAGIX fitting results indicate that this line is optically thin (τ ≤ 0.2). At a kinetic distance of ∼400 pc, the H2 column density can be estimated by converting from C18O as [C18O/H2] ∼ 2 × 10−7 toward Orion KL (Frerking et al. 1982; Plume et al. 2012; Crockett et al. 2014; Giannetti et al. 2014).

    The column density maps of the S-bearing species are derived, and their relative abundance ratios with respect to H2 are shown in Figure 11. In general, the carbon-free S-bearing species exhibit larger relative abundance with respect to H2 to the north, i.e., from the hot core and mm4 to mm5 and mm6, with low abundances toward mm2 and mm7. In contrast, the carbon–sulfur compounds seem to have large abundance not only toward the continuum peaks but also toward mm2 and mm7. Given that the lines we used to derive the molecular column densities are observed simultaneously and cover a large range of EU/k, we believe this chemical segregation is neither an excitation effect nor a sensitivity bias but rather the result of chemical differentiation.

    Figure 11.

    Figure 11. Relative abundance map of 34SO2, 34SO, H2S, OCS, 13CS, and H2CS with respect to H2 (converted from C18O obtained by assuming C18O/H2 ratio of 2 × 10−7). The black contours show the integrated intensity of each molecule in Figure 8. The contour levels are 1, 2, 4, 8, 16 × 5σ. Green crosses label the continuum peaks. Regions outside the pixel value corresponding to a 3σ detection of the most extended integrated intensity of SO2 lines are masked out.

    Standard image High-resolution image

    Inspecting possible correlations between both parameters pixel by pixel (Figure 12), we note that the abundances of OCS and 13CS decrease as the gas temperature increases from 40 to 180 K, and that of H2CS does not seem to be sensitive to this gas temperature range. As for the carbon-free S-bearing species, their abundances exhibit a drastic increase as the gas temperature changes from 40 to 90 K, increasing by an order of magnitude. Similar observational results confirmed that the abundance of SO2 was enhanced by more than two orders of magnitude from cold outer envelopes (T < 100 K) to hot inner envelopes (T > 100 K) (van der Tak et al. 2003). However, molecular abundances of these species exhibit no variation when the gas temperature increases from 90 to 180 K, which may be the result of depletion mechanisms (Wakelam et al. 2011).

    Figure 12.

    Figure 12. Correlation between the gas temperature (here, we take the rotation temperature of SO2) and molecular relative abundance ratios with respect to H2 (in different colors). Each point shows the statistical mean in a temperature bin of 10 K.

    Standard image High-resolution image

    4.3. Possible Chemical Relation

    It has long been proposed that relative abundance ratios of different S-bearing species have the possibility to trace the chemical history of star-forming regions (e.g., Charnley 1997; Hatchell et al. 1998; Wakelam et al. 2004, 2011). In Orion KL, the abundances of two groups of S-bearing species seem to be dependent on the gas temperature (Section 4.2). Therefore, we investigate the possible correlation between the gas temperature and the relative abundance ratios of 34SO/34SO2, OCS/SO2, and H2S/SO2 (Figure 13).

    Figure 13.

    Figure 13. Relative abundance ratios of 34SO/34SO2, OCS/SO2, and H2S/SO2 at different temperatures. Each point shows the statistical mean in a temperature bin of 10 K.

    Standard image High-resolution image

    The 34SO/34SO2 ratio decreases from 1.5 to 0.7 as the temperature increases from 60 ∼ 180 K, which is consistent with the results of Esplugues et al. (2014). It is known that SO can easily convert to SO2 as the temperature increases (Charnley 1997). In particular, shocks can enhance the abundances of SO and SO2 by two orders of magnitude (e.g., Pineau des Forets et al. 1993; Bachiller & Pérez Gutiérrez 1997; Wright & Plambeck 2017). As shown in Section 3.3, both SO and SO2 may enhance by shock events in Orion KL.

    The OCS/SO2 ratio decreases from 1.0 to 0.3 when the temperature increases from 40 to 100 K and stays constant at ∼0.2 from 100 to 180 K, consistent with the model prediction by Wakelam et al. 2011 (shown as their Figure 7). SO2 may be produced from species such as SO or evaporated to the gas phase at >100 K, whereas OCS may be destructed in such a temperature regime.

    The H2S/SO2 ratio is ∼0.3, exhibiting no obvious variations in the temperature range of 50–180 K. This result is consistent with that of Esplugues et al. (2014), which indicates a chemical age of ∼5 × 104 yr for the hot core region.

    5. Conclusion

    We constructed a combined ALMA and IRAM-30 m data set around the 1.3 mm band with a linear resolution of ∼800 au and a velocity resolution of 1 km s−1, in which 79 molecular lines from 6 S-bearing species (SO2, SO, H2S, OCS, 13CS, and H2CS) were identified. A clear dichotomy was found between carbon–sulfur compounds (OCS, 13CS, H2CS) and carbon-free S-bearing species (SO2, SO, H2S), in terms of their spatial distributions and kinematic features. The main conclusions are as follows:

    • 1.  
      Using the XCLASS package, we fit the synthetic spectrum of each species pixel by pixel and derive the rotational temperature map of SO2 under the assumption of LTE. A gradient from the warmest hot core (∼176 K) to the surrounding substructures (mm2, mm3, mm4, and mm5, ∼106 K) and the southern region mm7 (∼68 K) was found.
    • 2.  
      The carbon–sulfur compounds (i.e., OCS, 13CS, H2CS) exhibit spatial distributions concentrated toward the continuum peaks and extended to the south ridge. The carbon-free S-bearing species extended to the northeast of mm4. Specifically, there is a ring-like structure that appears in the channel maps of the SO2, 34SO, and H2S lines at velocities from 10 to 15 km s−1, which may be influenced by shocks from the OMC1 explosion.
    • 3.  
      The FWHM line widths of carbon–sulfur compounds are in the range of 2∼11 km s−1, increasing as temperature increases. The carbon-free S-bearing species exhibit broader FWHM line widths (12∼26 km s−1 ) toward mm2, mm3, mm4, and mm5, which is significantly broader than the hot core (7–14 km s−1) and mm7 (3–8 km s−1).
    • 4.  
      The molecular abundances of OCS and H2CS with respect to H2 decrease from the cold (∼68 K) to the hot (∼176 K) regions. In contrast, the molecular abundances of carbon-free S-bearing species, with respect to H2, increase by an order of magnitude when the temperature increases from 50 K to 100 K.
    • 5.  
      The relative abundance ratios of 34SO/34SO2 and OCS/SO2 enhanced in the warmer regions (>100 K) with respect to the colder regions (∼50 K). Such enhancements are consistent with the transformation of SO2 at warmer regions and the influence of shocks.

    This work has been supported by the National Key R&D Program of China No. 2017YFA0402600, the CAS Strategic Priority Research Program No. XDB23000000, the CAS International Partnership Program No. 114A11KYSB20160008, and the National Natural Science Foundation of China No. 11725313.

    S.F. acknowledges the support of the EACOA fellowship from the East Asia Core Observatories Association, which consists of the National Astronomical Observatory of China, the National Astronomical Observatory of Japan, the Academia Sinica Institute of Astronomy and Astrophysics, and the Korea Astronomy and Space Science Institute.

    S.L.Q. is supported by the Joint Research Fund in Astronomy (U1631237) under a cooperative agreement between the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) and the Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS) and by the Top Talents Program of Yunnan Province (2015HA030). N.Y.T. acknowledges the support from Natural Science Foundation of China grants (NSFC No. 11803051) and the CAS "Light of West China" Program. Z.Y.R. acknowledges the support from National Natural Science Foundation of China (U1731218).

    This paper makes use of the following ALMA data: ADS/ JAO.ALMA#2011.0.00009.SV. ALMA is a partnership of ESO (representing its member states), NSF (USA), and NINS (Japan), together with NRC (Canada), NSC and ASIAA (Taiwan), and KASI (Republic of Korea) in cooperation with the Republic of Chile. The Joint ALMA Observatory is operated by ESO, AUI/NRAO, and NAOJ.

    Software: MIRIAD (Sault et al. 1995), GILDAS/CLASS (Pety 2005; Gildas Team 2013), XCLASS (Möller et al. 2017), MAGIX (Möller et al. 2013).

    Appendix

    In this appendix, we present long tables including the identified transitions (Table 1), the XCLASS fitting results toward six spatial components (Table 2), and isotopologue ratios (Table 3).

    Table 1.  All the Combined Spectral Lines Identified in This Paper

    Species Transition Rest Frequency Eu Sijμ2 Log10(Aij) Blended rms Ipeak(hot core)
        (MHz) (K)       (Jy beam−1) (Jy beam−1)
      163,13−162,14 214689.4 147.83 28.37 −4.00   0.11 11.0
      176,12−185,13 214728.3 228.96 5.75 −4.72   0.05 7.14
      262,24−271,27 215094.5 340.55 0.41 −6.05 CH3CH2CN 0.06  
      222,20−221,21 216643.3 248.44 35.25 −4.03   0.08 10.5
      227,15−236,18 219276.0 352.75 7.81 −4.67   0.05 5.56
      363,33−372,36 222869.1 648.60 0.96 −5.77 a 0.004 0.27
      278,20−287,21 223434.5 504.42 9.87 −4.63 a 0.01 2.61
      464,42−473,45 224473.4 1054.52 1.59 −5.65 blended with CH3CH2CNa 0.04  
      415,37−406,34 226508.3 856.96 15.25 −4.60 a 0.007 0.64
      329,23−338,26 227335.8 683.92 11.93 −4.60 a 0.006 1.21
      115,7−124,8 229347.6 122.00 3.13 −4.72   0.05 8.80
    SO2, υ = 0 456,40−447,37 229749.7 1044.76 18.38 −4.55 CH3OH 0.08  
      3710,28−389,29 230965.2 891.24 13.98 −4.57   0.04 0.83
      283,25−282,26 234187.1 403.03 55.10 −3.84   0.06 9.50
      4211,31−4310,34 234353.0 1126.34 16.04 −4.55 Na13CN/NaN13C 0.03  
      166,10−175,13 234421.6 213.32 5.17 −4.63 CH3CH2CN 0.07  
      42,2−31,3 235151.7 19.03 4.57 −4.11   0.10 9.68
      161,15−152,14 236216.7 130.66 16.14 −4.12   0.19 11.7
     
      115,7−124,8 213807.3 119.95 3.12 −4.81   0.03 0.83
      166,10−175,13 215468.1 210.34 5.17 −4.74 blended 0.05  
      143,11−142,12 215999.7 118.26 23.32 −4.03   0.05 4.42
      217,15−226,16 216593.5 328.45 7.23 −4.70   0.04 1.70
      111,11−100,10 219355.0 60.16 20.75 −3.96   0.05 5.94
    34SO2 222,20−221,21 221114.9 248.19 33.77 −4.02 blended 0.03  
      42,2−31,3 229857.6 18.70 4.54 −4.15 CH3OH, CH3CHO, OS18O 0.04  
      54,2−63,3 230933.4 51.76 0.68 −5.06   0.04 0.57
      156,10−165,11 235004.0 195.63 4.59 −4.56 (CH3)2CO 0.02  
      52,4−41,3 235927.5 23.26 5.66 −4.10 blended 0.06  
      103,7−102,8 235951.9 71.97 14.60 −3.97 blended 0.06  
      202,18−193,17 236225.1 207.54 12.70 −4.32 SO2 0.19  
      207,13−216,16 236295.7 309.13 6.64 −4.60   0.03 0.84
      193,17−200,20 236428.8 196.18 0.35 −5.86 CH2CH13CN 0.03  
     
      64,2−73,5, F = 11/2−11/2 217628.2 58.71 0.03 −6.46      
      64,2−73,5, F = 9/2−11/2 217628.2 58.71 0.88 −4.98      
    33SO2 64,2−73,5, F = 15/2−17/2 217628.4 58.71 1.37 −4.99   0.04 0.23
      64,2−73,5, F = 11/2−13/2 217628.7 58.71 1.02 −4.99      
      64,2−73,5, F = 13/2−13/2 217628.8 58.71 0.05 −6.40      
      64,2−73,5, F = 13/2−15/2 217628.9 58.71 1.18 −4.99      
      64,2−73,5, F = 15/2−15/2 217629.1 58.71 0.03 −6.58      
      222,20−221,21, F = 45/2−45/2 218875.4 251.78 34.93 −4.03      
      222,20−221,21, F = 45/2−43/2 218875.6 251.78 0.14 −6.44      
      222,20−221,21, F = 43/2−45/2 218875.7 251.78 0.14 −6.42      
      222,20−221,21, F = 43/2−43/2 218875.9 251.78 33.41 −4.03      
      222,20−221,21, F = 45/2−47/2 218876.6 251.78 0.10 −6.57      
      222,20−221,21, F = 43/2−41/2 218877.3 251.78 0.10 −6.55   0.05 1.00
      222,20−221,21, F = 47/2−45/2 218880.7 251.78 0.10 −6.59      
      222,20−221,21, F = 41/2−43/2 218880.9 251.78 0.10 −6.53      
      222,20−221,21, F = 47/2−47/2 218881.9 251.78 36.60 −4.03      
      222,20−221,21, F = 41/2−41/2 218882.3 251.78 32.01 −4.03      
      111,11−100,10, F = 19/2−19/2 220613.4 61.10 0.25 −5.80      
      111,11−100,10, F = 19/2−17/2 220617.4 61.10 17.51 −3.96      
      111,11−100,10, F = 25/2−23/2 220617.8 61.10 23.09 −3.95 ${\mathrm{CH}}_{3}^{13}\mathrm{CN}$ 0.05  
      111,11−100,10, F = 21/2−21/2 220619.7 61.10 0.34 −5.72      
      111,11−100,10, F = 21/2−19/2 220620.4 61.10 19.20 −3.96      
      111,11−100,10, F = 23/2−21/2 220620.7 61.10 21.06 −3.96      
      111,11−100,10, F = 23/2−23/2 220624.7 61.10 0.25 −5.88      
      143,11−142,12, F = 27/2−25/2 220983.1 61.10 0.16 −6.14      
      143,11−142,12, F = 29/2−31/2 220983.3 61.10 0.16 −6.17      
      143,11−142,12, F = 25/2−25/2 220985.4 61.10 20.40 −4.01      
      143,11−142,12, F = 31/2−31/2 220985.8 61.10 25.15 −4.01      
    33SO2 143,11−142,12, F = 29/2−27/2 220988.5 120.26 0.22 −6.04 blended 0.03  
      143,11−142,12, F = 27/2−27/2 220988.7 120.26 21.77 −4.01      
      143,11−142,12, F = 29/2−29/2 220989.0 120.26 23.35 −4.01      
      143,11−142,12, F = 27/2−29/2 220989.2 120.26 0.22 −6.01      
      143,11−142,12, F = 25/2−27/2 220991.0 120.26 0.16 −6.10      
      143,11−142,12, F = 31/2−29/2 220991.5 120.26 0.16 −6.19      
      202,18−193,17, F = 41/2−41/2 230435.3 210.54 0.05 −6.80      
      202,18−193,17, F = 41/2−39/2 230436.4 210.54 12.71 −4.37      
      202,18−193,17, F = 39/2−39/2 230436.7 210.54 0.06 −6.65      
      202,18−193,17, F = 39/2−37/2 230436.7 210.54 12.08 −4.37   0.03 0.55
      202,18−193,17, F = 43/2−41/2 230441.0 210.54 13.36 −4.36      
      202,18−193,17, F = 37/2−35/2 230441.4 210.54 11.49 −4.37      
      202,18−193,17, F = 37/2−37/2 230442.2 210.54 0.05 −6.75      
      123,9−122,10, F = 23/2−21/2 231894.9 94.88 0.18 −5.98      
      123,9−122,10, F = 25/2−27/2 231895.1 94.88 0.18 −6.01      
      123,9−122,10, F = 21/2−21/2 231896.6 94.88 15.94 −3.98      
      123,9−122,10, F = 27/2−27/2 231897.0 94.88 20.33 −3.98      
      123,9−122,10, F = 25/2−23/2 231899.7 94.88 0.23 −5.89 CH3C15N, ${{\rm{C}}}_{2}{{\rm{H}}}_{5}^{13}\mathrm{CN}$ 0.05  
      123,9−122,10, F = 23/2−23/2 231899.8 94.88 17.17 −3.98      
      123,9−122,10, F = 25/2−25/2 231900.2 94.88 18.63 −3.98      
      123,9−122,10, F = 23/2−25/2 231900.4 94.88 0.23 −5.85      
      123,9−122,10, F = 21/2−23/2 231901.5 94.88 0.18 −5.94      
      123,9−122,10, F = 27/2−25/2 231902.1 94.88 0.18 −6.04      
      42,2−31,3, F = 9/2−7/2 232415.3 19.12 4.58 −4.17      
      42,2−31,3, F = 7/2−7/2 232415.6 19.12 0.54 −5.00      
      42,2−31,3, F = 5/2−7/2 232416.5 19.12 0.02 −6.43      
      42,2−31,3, F = 7/2−5/2 232418.4 19.12 3.44 −4.20 CH3OH 0.10  
      42,2−31,3, F = 5/2−5/2 232419.3 19.12 0.41 −5.00      
    33SO2 42,2−31,3,F = 9/ 2−9/2 232421.1 19.12 0.42 −5.22      
      42,2−31,3, F = 11/2−9/2 232422.2 19.12 6.00 −4.14      
      42,2−31,3, F = 5/2−3/2 232425.2 19.12 2.57 −4.20      
      283,25−282,26, F = 57/2−59/2 235722.4 408.45 0.10 −6.58      
      283,25−282,26, F = 55/2−53/2 235722.9 408.45 0.10 −6.56      
      283,25−282,26, F = 57/2−57/2 235724.9 408.45 55.16 −3.84      
      283,25−282,26, F = 57/2−55/2 235724.9 408.45 0.13 −6.45      
      283,25−282,26, F = 55/2−57/2 235725.1 408.45 0.13 −6.44      
      283,25−282,26, F = 55/2−55/2 235725.1 408.45 53.25 −3.84   0.04 0.75
      283,25−282,26, F = 59/2−59/2 235728.7 408.45 57.20 −3.84      
      283,25−282,26, F = 53/2−53/2 235728.9 408.45 51.46 −3.84      
      283,25−282,26, F = 53/2−55/2 235731.1 408.45 0.10 −6.55      
      283,25−282,26, F = 59/2−57/2 235731.2 408.45 0.10 −6.59      
     
      273,24−272,25 215587.1 377.80 336.41 −2.88 blended 0.08  
      130,13−121,12 217018.4 81.94 146.71 −3.55 (CH3)2CO 0.05  
      153,12−152,13 219240.2 133.72 148.94 −3.67 (CH3)2CO 0.03  
      133,10−132,11 230231.4 106.72 119.90 −3.56 C3H8 0.04  
    OS17O 115,7−124,8 230569.4 123.49 18.37 −4.16 CO 0.17  
      121,12−110,11 230684.3 71.17 134.20 −3.42   0.04 0.30
      142,13−141,14 230810.9 106.25 81.07 −3.80 CH2CHCN 0.04  
      181,17−180,18 232123.6 163.68 96.08 −3.20 13CH3CN 0.03  
      140,14−131,13 236758.0 94.30 163.17 −3.47 blended 0.04  
     
      132,12−131,13 215756.4 92.58 13.01 −4.25 blended 0.04  
      232,21−231,22 216415.5 268.02 35.95 −4.04   0.04 0.419
    OS18O 161,15−152,14 217102.7 129.67 15.17 −4.26 SiO 0.12  
      42,3−31,2 218230.3 19.19 4.79 −4.19 blended 0.09  
      153,12−152,13 218316.9 132.52 24.36 −4.02 CH2CHCN 0.10  
      140,14−131,13 229854.9 93.29 26.72 −3.89 34SO2 0.04  
      52,4−41,3 233497.6 23.73 5.41 −4.14 CH3CH2CN 0.05  
    OS18O 123,9−122,10 233588.4 93.92 17.57 −3.98 CH2CDCN 0.04  
      242,22−241,23 233950.0 290.45 35.43 −3.97 blended 0.03  
      152,14−151,15 236805.0 118.73 13.90 −4.15 13CH2CHCN 0.06  
     
      78−77 214357.0 81.24 0.44 −5.47 13CH3CN 0.08  
    SO 55−44 215220.7 44.10 11.31 −3.92   0.19 15.2
      65−54 219949.4 34.98 14.01 −3.87   0.17 16.6
      12−21 236452.3 15.81 0.03 −5.85   0.03 1.60
     
    34SO 65−54 215839.9 34.38 14.02 −3.90   0.09 9.58
     
      65−54, F = 9/2−7/2 217827.2 34.67 10.20 −3.91      
    33SO 65−54, F = 11/2−9/2 217829.8 34.67 12.17 −3.91 blended 0.06  
      65−54, F = 13/2−11/2 217831.8 34.68 14.52 −3.90      
      65−54, F = 15/2−13/2 217832.6 34.68 17.26 −3.89      
     
    S18O 56−45 232265.8 47.76 11.38 −3.82 39SiC2 0.04  
     
    OCS 18−17 218903.4 99.81 9.21 −4.52   0.09 9.78
      19−18 231061.0 110.90 9.72 −4.44   0.10 9.40
     
    OC33S 18−17 216147.4 98.55 9.21 −4.04 NH2CH2CN 0.04  
     
    O13CS 18−17 218199.0 99.49 9.21 −4.52   0.05 1.53
      19−18 230317.5 110.54 9.72 −4.45   0.04 1.34
     
    18OCS 19−18 216753.5 104.04 9.70 −4.53 CH3CH2CN 0.04  
     
    13CS 5−4 231220.7 33.29 38.33 −3.60   0.05 5.86
     
    H2S 22,0−21,1 216710.4 83.98 2.06 −4.31   0.09 8.89
     
    ${{\rm{H}}}_{2}^{34}{\rm{S}}$ 22,0−21,1 214376.9 83.80 2.07 −4.32 13CH3CN 0.09  
     
      22,0−21,1, J = 1/2−3/2 215494.4 83.89 0.41 −4.62      
      22,0−21,1, J = 1/2−1/2 215496.7 83.89 0.41 −4.62      
      22,0−21,1, J = 7/2−5/2 215500.8 83.89 0.47 −5.16      
      22,0−21,1, J = 7/2−7/2 215502.8 83.89 2.83 −4.39      
    ${{\rm{H}}}_{2}^{33}{\rm{S}}$ 22,0−21,1, J = 3/2−5/2 215503.8 83.89 0.58 −4.77 blended 0.06  
      22,0−21,1, J = 3/2−3/2 215505.4 83.89 0.66 −4.72      
      22,0−21,1, J = 3/2−1/2 215507.6 83.89 0.41 −4.92      
      22,0−21,1, J = 5/2−5/2 215511.6 83.89 1.42 −4.56      
      22,0−21,1, J = 5/2−3/2 215513.4 83.89 0.58 −4.95      
      22,0−21,1, J = 5/2−7/2 215513.4 83.89 0.47 −5.04      
     
    H2CS 71,7−61,6 236727.0 58.62 55.95 −3.72   0.05 2.99
     
    H2C34S 71,7−61,6 232754.7 57.87 55.89 −3.74   0.04 0.61
      72,5−62,4 236441.8 98.11 17.47 −3.75   0.02 0.27
     
      71,7−61,6, J = 11/2−11/2 234670.6 58.23 1.70 −5.15      
      71,7−61,6, J = 13/2−13/2 234677.0 58.23 2.26 −5.09      
      71,7−61,6, J = 15/2−13/2 234678.8 58.23 57.92 −3.74      
    H2C33S 71,7−61,6, J = 17/2−15/2 234678.8 58.23 67.07 −3.73 CH3OH 0.07  
      71,7−61,6, J = 13/2−11/2 234679.0 58.23 49.89 −3.75      
      71,7−61,6, J = 11/2−9/2 234679.1 58.23 42.99 −3.75      
      71,7−61,6, J = 15/2−15/2 234687.0 58.23 1.70 −5.27      

    Note.

    aLines from ALMA alone.

    Download table as:  ASCIITypeset images: 1 2 3 4

    Table 2.  The Optimum Solutions of Different Parameters

    Species Trot Column Density Δ V Vlsr
      (K) (×1016cm−2) (km s−1) (km s−1)
    hot core
    SO2 176 ± 9 58 ± 12 6.7 ± 0.1 7.8 ± 0.1
    34SO2   6 ± 1 9.8 ± 0.3  
    33SO2   0.2 3.00  
    OS17O   0.08 ± 0.03 5 ± 3  
    OS18O   0.20 2.00  
    34SO   4 ± 2 12.6 ± 0.5 7.6 ± 0.2
    33SO   1.3 ± 0.6 12.4 ± 0.5  
    OCS   10 ± 6 11.0 ± 0.5 7.0 ± 0.2
    O13CS   0.5 ± 0.2 7.2 ± 0.5  
    13CS   0.3 ± 0.1 7.5 ± 0.4 7.0 ± 0.2
    H2S   17 ± 7 13.9 ± 0.6 7.1 ± 0.2
    H2CS   0.8 ± 0.3 7.1 ± 0.3 8.2 ± 0.1
    H2C34S   0.042 ± 0.003 4 ± 4  
    C18O   40 ± 19 9.4 ± 0.3 7.7 ± 0.2
    mm2
    SO2 105 ± 7 31 ± 14 17.9 ± 0.5 6.5 ± 0.3
    34SO2   1.8 ± 0.3 18.0 ± 0.7  
    33SO2   0.2 4.0  
    OS17O    
    OS18O    
    34SO   2 ± 1 18.1 ± 0.5 7.3 ± 0.2
    33SO   0.32 ± 0.01 16.4 ± 0.1  
    OCS   5 ± 4 7.7 ± 0.3 7.7 ± 0.2
    O13CS   0.14 ± 0.03 6 ± 5  
    13CS   0.095 ± 0.001 4.02 ± 0.01 8.60 ± 0.01
    H2S   9.35 20.20 8.47
    H2CS   0.4 ± 0.1 4.6 ± 0.4 8.5 ± 0.1
    H2C34S   0.0057 ± 0.0006 1 ± 1  
    C18O   23 ± 6 6 ± 2 8.8 ± 0.2
    mm3
    SO2   26 ± 8 18.3 ± 0.5 8.8 ± 0.3
    34SO2   1.3 ± 0.2 18.3 ± 0.5  
    33SO2    
    OS17O    
    OS18O    
    34SO   2 ± 1 16.8 ± 0.5 9.8 ± 0.2
    33SO   0.31 ± 0.01 18 ± 17  
    OCS 107 ± 9 4 ± 2 6.1 ± 0.3 8.6 ± 0.2
    O13CS   0.23 ± 0.06 6 ± 2  
    13CS   0.065 ± 0.003 4.11 ± 0.02 8.75 ± 0.01
    H2S   8.00 20.45 8.87
    H2CS   0.50 ± 0.01 4.09 ± 0.01 8.89 ± 0.01
    H2C34S   0.009 ± 0.001 2.00  
    C18O   17 ± 5 6.1 ± 0.7 8.5 ± 0.2
    mm4
    SO2 105 ± 9 24 ± 12 14.4 ± 0.7 10.7 ± 0.3
    34SO2   1.1 ± 0.3 14.9 ± 0.6  
    33SO2    
    OS17O    
    OS18O    
    34SO   1.5 ± 0.7 12.1 ± 0.5 10.4 ± 0.2
    33SO   0.23 ± 0.01 12.8 ± 1.6  
    OCS   4 ± 3 6.5 ± 0.4 8.3 ± 0.2
    O13CS   0.12 ± 0.03 6 ± 3  
    13CS   0.087 ± 0.001 4.36 ± 0.03 8.48 ± 0.01
    H2S   5.60 16.27 10.44
    H2CS   0.6 ± 0.2 5.0 ± 0.2 8.3 ± 0.1
    H2C34S   0.008 ± 0.001 2 ± 1  
    C18O   19 ± 6 5.1 ± 0.3 9.1 ± 0.2
    mm5
    SO2 105 ± 11 19 ± 8 25.0 ± 0.6 10.8 ± 0.3
    34SO2   1.15 ± 0.01 21.2 ± 0.2  
    33SO2    
    OS17O    
    OS18O    
    34SO   1.4 ± 0.6 21.7 ± 0.4 11.2 ± 0.2
    33SO   0.25 ± 0.01 20 ± 1  
    OCS   3 ± 2 7.9 ± 0.4 9.0 ± 0.2
    O13CS   0.075 ± 0.002 5.4 ± 0.7  
    13CS   0.051 ± 0.001 6.3 ± 0.5 8.94 ± 0.02
    H2S   6.81 26.13 10.05
    H2CS   0.34 ± 0.01 4.70 ± 0.03 8.82 ± 0.01
    H2C34S   0.006 ± 0.001 2.00  
    C18O   12 ± 3 6.3 ± 0.5 9.1 ± 0.2
    mm7
    SO2   0.8 ± 0.1 7.9 ± 0.6 10.7 ± 0.4
    34SO2   0.022 ± 0.006 15 ± 5  
    33SO2    
    OS17O    
    OS18O    
    34SO   0.033 ± 0.001 6 ± 1 12 ± 12
    33SO    
    OCS 68 ± 11 0.8 ± 0.3 2.8 ± 0.4 8.9 ± 0.2
    O13CS   0.010 ± 0.001 2 ± 2  
    13CS   0.015 ± 0.001 3.2 ± 0.2 8.78 ± 0.02
    H2S   0.085 ± 0.004 2.6 ± 0.4 9.2 ± 0.3
    H2CS   0.12 ± 0.01 2.62 ± 0.03 9.05 ± 0.02
    H2C34S    
    C18O   5.66 ± 0.07 3 ± 3 8.99 ± 0.02

    Download table as:  ASCIITypeset images: 1 2

    Table 3.  Sulfur Isotopologue Ratios toward Different Regions

    Ratio Hot core mm2 mm3 mm4 mm5 mm7 Average
    SO2/34SO2 10 ± 3 17 ± 8 20 ± 7 22 ± 12 17 ± 7 35 ± 12 20 ± 4
    34SO/33SO 3 ± 2 6 ± 3 6 ± 3 6 ± 3 6 ± 2 6 ± 1
    OCS/O13CS 18 ± 14 38 ± 30 18 ± 10 36 ± 26 43 ± 21 75 ± 28 38 ± 9
    H2CS/H2C34S 19 ± 8 67 ± 21 56 ± 6 69 ± 27 57 ± 10 53 ± 7

    Download table as:  ASCIITypeset image

    Footnotes

    Please wait… references are loading.
    10.3847/1538-4357/ab45ef