Brought to you by:

A publishing partnership

The Evolutionary Status of GK Subgiants

Published 2019 April 17 © 2019. The American Astronomical Society. All rights reserved.
, , Citation Helmut A. Abt 2019 AJ 157 177 DOI 10.3847/1538-3881/ab11c6

Download Article PDF
DownloadArticle ePub

You need an eReader or compatible software to experience the benefits of the ePub3 file format.

1538-3881/157/5/177

Abstract

Snowden & Young suggested that the reason why there are GK subgiants is because they are members of binaries, which would bring them above the main sequence in an Hertzsprung–Russell (HR) diagram. They studied a sample of 30 G0-K1 IV stars and were disappointed to find only two to be spectroscopic binaries. With more accurate radial velocities I found seven binaries in their samples of subgiants and control stars; orbital elements are given for those seven. Using Hipparcos parallaxes and SIMBAD data, I found that nearly all of the G0-K1 IV stars fall on the evolutionary tracks by Garardi et al. for Population I stars with masses of 0.9–1.9 M and ages of up to 1010 yr, which are normal parameters for nearby field stars. Therefore there is no problem regarding the existence of GK subgiants.

Export citation and abstract BibTeX RIS

1. Introduction

The existence of field Population I GK stars later than the Sun and 1–4 mag above the main sequence (MS) may be a problem. Has there been enough elapsed time for them to evolve from the MS? Or are those new stars contracting to the MS? If they were contracting stars, they would be in or close to star-forming nebulosities, which they are not. Snowden & Young (2005) explored the possibility that they are above the MS because they are binary stars. Actually, a pair of similar MS stars cannot be more than 0.75 mag above the MS, which is inadequate to explain subgiants, and if one star of a pair is above the MS and redder, that only transfers the problem to explaining its existence. Nevertheless, Snowden & Young obtained coudé spectra of 30 GK subgiants and found only two binaries (HD 102928, 170928), but felt that their measures were insufficiently accurate. They asked David Latham to obtain additional radial velocities, which are presented in Section 2.

The Snowden–Young sample of GK class IV stars north of −20° decl. was selected from the Yale Catalog of Bright Stars (Hoffleit 1964). Since then, particularly with the Hipparcos satellite, we learned more about those bright stars and learned that with more recent spectral types and parallaxes, 7 of their 44 stars are class V and 7 are class III. The remaining 30 class IV stars have absolute magnitudes of M = 0.1 to 3.6 and $B-V$ = 0.63 to 1.15. When the latter are converted to Teff using the calibration by Drilling & Landoldt (2004), the range is log Teff = 3.67–3.77. All of these stars are within the local interstellar cavity (Abt 2011), in which the interstellar density is only a few percent of that in typical regions (Sfeir et al. 1999), so no corrections are needed for interstellar reddening. The 30 Snowden–Young class IV stars are listed in Table 1 with columns (1) HD numbers, (2) spectral types preferred by SIMBAD, (3) the absolute magnitudes M derived from Hipparcos parallaxes, (4) log Teff, and (5) log L/L, where ${L}_{\odot }$ is the luminosity of the Sun.

Table 1.  The Snowden–Young Candidate GK Subgiants

HD MK Types M Log Teff Log L/L Mean Velocity (km s−1)
2589 K0 IV 3.39 3.69 0.61 +13.75 ± 0.02 (4)
8375 G5 IV 2.52 3.70 0.92 +6.18 ± 3.49 (18) SBO
20559 G9 IV 1.23 3.71 1.44 +31.61 ± 1.04 (12)
23249 K0+IV 3.76 3.69 0.42 −6.24 ± 0.94 (21)
26923 G0 IV 4.62 3.77 0.08 −7.31 ± 0.55 (15)
29613 K0.5 IV 1.57 3.68 1.30 +58.99 ± 1.33 (7)
47205 K1.5 III-IV 2.43 3.66 0.96 +2.78 ± 0.52 (6)
67228 G1 IV 3.46 3.77 0.54 −36.76 ± 0.91 (18)
73593 G8 IV 1.65 3.70 1.27 −38.57 ± 1.17 (18)
76291 K1 IV 1.46 3.68 1.34 +56.78 ± 1.11 (15)
82210 G6 III-IV 2.05 3.71 1.11 −27.80 ± 1.01 (23)
92588 G9 IV 3.32 3.70 0.60 +42.80 ± 0.64 (181)
111028 K1 III-IV 2.39 3.69 0.97 +51.76 ± 1.14 (18)
115202 K1 IV 2.29 3.68 1.01 +35.25 ± 1.42 (24)
138716 K1 III-IV 3.32 3.67 0.60 +48.53 ± 0.87 (25)
139641 G7 III-IV 1.67 3.70 1.26 −10.55 ± 0.82 (20)
142980 K1 IV 1.18 3.68 1.46 −70.45 ± 0.57 (21)
145148 K1.5 IV 3.68 3.67 0.46 −4.25 ± 1.19 (24)
150680 G0 IV 2.65 3.77 0.87 −73.00 ± 2.01 (37)VB
158614AB G9 IV-V 4.24 3.71 0.23 SBO=VB (46.34 yr)
170811 K0 IV 1.21 3.69 1.44 −11.22 ± 0.12 (6)
171994 G8 IV 1.45 3.70 1.35 −42.59 ± 0.71 (16)
182572 G7 IV 4.25 3.71 0.23 −100.34 ± 0.45 (369)
188512 G8 IV 3.03 3.70 0.72 −40.18 ± 0.53 (83)
190360 G7 IV-V 4.71 3.71 0.04 −45.37 ± 0.54 (136)
191026 G8.5 IV 3.46 3.70 0.54 −32.83 ± 0.47 (15)
196755 G2 IV 2.66 3.76 0.86 −53.34 ± 0.91 (22)
197964 K1 IV 1.33 3.68 1.40 −6.17 ± 0.68 (110)
198149 K0 IV 2.64 3.69 0.87 −87.63 ± 0.77 (30)
222404 K1 III-IV 2.47 3.67 0.94 −43.52 ± 1.04 (19)

Download table as:  ASCIITypeset image

Only one star (HD 139641) has [Fe/H] < −0.30 from SIMBAD and is therefore is not of Population I.

In addition, Snowden & Young observed 14 additional stars as controls. They were GK III standards of radial velocities and three known spectroscopic binaries: HD 102928 (Massarotti et al. 2008), HD 150680 (Katoh et al. 2013), and HD 170829 (Katoh et al. 2013). Table 2 lists those 14 + 3 stars plus Snowden & Young stars that are not class IV. Only 2 of those 30 stars (HD 3546, 135722) have values of [Fe/H] from SIMBAD that are not characteristic of Population I stars.

Table 2.  The Standard Velocity Stars, Class V, Class III, and Three Binaries

HD Type M Mean Velocity (km s−1)
3546 G7 III +0.88 −84.27 ± 1.28 (14)
18449 K2 III −0.33 −36.92 ± 0.32 (5)
32923 G4 V +4.06 +20.53 ± 0.61 (98)
39003 K0.5 III −0.29 +10.21 ± 0.90 (24)
39587 G0 V +4.71 +13.55 ± 1.05 (139) SBO (5267 days)
45410 K0.5 III +2.15 +38.68 ± 0.96 (19)
52711 G0 V +4.52 +23.90 ± 0.96 26)
58207 G9 III +0.95 +6.83 ± 0.97 (23)
62345 G8 III +0.39 +20.37 ± 1.99 (42) SBO (4259 days)
69267 K4 III −1.32 +22.77 ± 0.67 (25)
76294 G8.5 III −0.45 +22.71 ± 1.16 (28) SBO (9.3449 days)
82734 K0 III −0.23 +15.52 ± 0.55 (16)
82885 G8 V +5.06 +14.29 ± 0.77 (26)
96833 K1 III −0.22 −3.80 ± 0.75 (33)
102928 K0+ III +0.82 +16.19 ± 11.01 (17) SBO (491.15 days)
113996 K5− III −0.35 −15.73 ± 0.50 (223) SBO (2807.8 days)
135722 G8 III +0.63 −12.43 ± 0.75 (29)
141992 K4.5 IV −0.72 −61.85 ± 0.53 (10)
150680 G0 IV +2.65 −73.00 ± 2.01 (37)
153210 K2 III +0.96 −55.84 ± 0.80 (27)
153226 K0 V +2.43 −31.75 ± 1.20 (21)
156846 G1 V +3.14 −68.57 ± 0.73 (12)
168775 K2− III −0.10 −24.34 ± 0.72 (16)
170829 G8 V +3.74 −60.86 ± 9.37 (23) SBO (26.3847 days)
176668 G6 III +1.59 −7.86 ± 0.43 (6)
203504 K1 III +0.69 −76.55 ± 0.80 (15)
218527 G6 III +0.87 −19.10 ± 6.61 (28) SBO (924.4 days)

Download table as:  ASCIITypeset images: 1 2

A parallel problem concerned the Mt. Wilson late-type subgiants. They were calibrated by spectral line ratios, rather than Morgan-Keenan (MK) types. There were doubts about that calibration because of its failure to fit supergiants. However, Sandage et al. (2016) showed that the luminosities of the 90 G0-K3 Mt. Wilson subgiants agree with their Hipparcos parallaxes, so those are also real subgiants.

2. The Latham Radial Velocities

Most of the new radial velocities of these bright stars were obtained with the 1.53 m Harvard Tillinghast telescope at the Oak Ridge Station. The original digital spectrograph, which gave velocity accuracies of σ ≈ ±0.3 km s−1, was replaced in 2011 with an echelle spectrograph (Tillinghast Reflector Echelle Spectrograph) giving σ = ±0.10 km s−1. The improvement is shown very well in the velocity curve of HD 62345 (Figure 3). The individual velocities can be found at https://www.cfa.harvard.edu/~latham/snowden/snowden.orb. The measures are also listed in Table 3, which is available online. For each star the columns give the Julian date, radial velocity in km s−1, the telescope aperature in centimeters, and the estimated error in km s−1.

Table 3.  The Latham Measures for the Subgiants and Control Stars

STAR: HD 002589 00:30:54.2 +77:01:10 t05250g40p00v002
55885.7489 13.76 153.3 0.10
55905.7625 13.73 153.3 0.10
55957.5601 13.74 153.3 0.10
56239.7576 13.77 153.3 0.10
STAR: HD 003546 00:38:33.3 +29:18:42 t05750g35p00v004
40517.6836 −83.80 53.0 0.43
41642.7695 −84.29 53.0 0.35
41643.7422 −86.07 53.0 0.32
41644.7578 −86.26 53.0 0.27
41645.7461 −85.31 53.0 0.29
42331.8906 −83.79 53.0 0.27
42334.8945 −83.49 53.0 0.28
42337.8750 −80.89 53.0 0.25
53006.5647 −84.36 153.7 0.23
53220.8039 −84.35 153.7 0.25
53413.4685 −84.88 153.7 0.25
54874.5681 −84.12 43.0 0.16
55957.5627 −84.05 153.3 0.10
56239.7275 −84.08 153.3 0.10

Only a portion of this table is shown here to demonstrate its form and content. A machine-readable version of the full table is available.

Download table as:  DataTypeset images: 1 2

For the Snowden–Young program stars, the last column of Table 1 gives the mean radial velocities measured by Latham, the standard error of each, and the number of measures. The orbital elements for the spectroscopic binary HD 8375, based on new additional measures, are given in Table 4. For HD 158614 the elements were determined by Pourbaix (2000). Only 3 of the 30 Snowden–Young stars turn out to be spectroscopic binaries with derived orbital elements, so it does not look as though the location of the GK subgiants in an Hertzsprung–Russell (HR) diagram can be explained by their being binaries.

Table 4.  Spectroscopic Orbital Elements

HD P (days) γ (km s−1) K (km s−1) e ω (days) T (JD) a sin i (Gm) f (M)
8375 84.523 6.504 5.11 0.17 274.6 52167 5.851 1.12(10−3)
  ±0.011 ±0.136 ±0.21 ±0.04 ±13.4 ±3 ±0.243 ±0.14
39587 5266.9 −13.71 1.84 0.53 109.5 51397 112.8 2.06
  ±54.9 ±0.05 ±0.10 ±0.04 ±5.0 ±54 ±6.5 ±0.34
62345 4259.2 20.49 3.86 0.71 314.1 51273 158.2 8.73
  ±58.5 ±0.15 ±1.63 ±0.15 ±13.2 ±58 ±75.2 ±0.11
76294 9.3449 22.76 1.98 0.49 38.7 48377.8 0.221 0.0049
  ±0.0002 ±0.13 ±0.54 ±0.18 ±15.7 ±0.4 ±0.065 ±0.0041
102928 491.15 14.92 14.57 0.26 128.7 49710.1 94.3 138.
  ±0.17 ±0.18 ±0.23 ±0.02 ±3.9 ±5.1 ±1.6 ±6.8
113996 2807.8 −15.72 0.49 0.82 23.3 47414 11.1 0.007
  ±16.9 ±0.03 ±0.13 ±0.07 ±10.6 ±30 ±3.4 ±0.006
170829 26.385 −58.30 12.66 0.22 219.0 50520.4 4.49 5.17
  ±0.0002 ±0.12 ±0.15 ±0.01 ±3.6 ±0.2 ±0.06 ±0.19
218527 924.36 −22.18 14.95 0.016 184.8 51767 190.0 320
  ±0.52 ±0.20 ±0.31 ±0.014 ±45.2 ±117 ±4.0 ±0.2

Download table as:  ASCIITypeset image

Table 2 gives the mean velocities for the 14 constant-velocity giants, the class V and class III stars in the Snowden–Young sample, and three known binaries (HD 102928, 150680, and 170829). The columns give (1) the HD number, (2) the MK type preferred by SIMBAD, (3) the absolute magnitude M derived from the Hipparcos parallaxes, (4) the mean radial velocities measured by Latham, standard errors, and the numbers of measures, and (5) information about spectroscopic binaries (SBs) with derived orbital elements (spectroscopic binaries with orbital elements; SBO).

Table 4 gives the orbital elements for the seven new SBOs discovered among the stars in Table 2 plus the Latham orbital elements for HD 8375, the previously known SBO. The radial velocity curves are shown in Figures 18.

Figure 1.

Figure 1. Measured radial velocities and derived velocity curve for the G5 IV binary HD 8375. The horizontal dashed line gives the γ-velocity. The period is 84.5 days.

Standard image High-resolution image
Figure 2.

Figure 2. Measured radial velocities and derived velocity curve for the G0 V binary HD 39587, whose period is 5266 days = 14.4 yr.

Standard image High-resolution image
Figure 3.

Figure 3. Measured radial velocities and derived velocity curve for the G8 III binary HD 62345 with a period of 11.7 yr. The measures from phases 0.25 to 0.95 were obtained with the original digital spectrograph and those from 0.25 with the new echelle spectrograph.

Standard image High-resolution image
Figure 4.

Figure 4. Measured radial velocities and derived velocity curve for the G8.5 III binary HD 76294, whose period is 9.34 days.

Standard image High-resolution image
Figure 5.

Figure 5. Measured radial velocities and derived velocity curve for the K0+ III binary HD 102928, whose period is 491 days.

Standard image High-resolution image
Figure 6.

Figure 6. Measured radial velocities and derived velocity curve for the K5− III binary HD 113996, whose period is 2808 days = 7.7 yr. Note that the vertical scale is more expanded relative to the other graphs.

Standard image High-resolution image
Figure 7.

Figure 7. Measured radial velocities and derived velocity curve for the G8 V binary HD 170829, whose period is 26.4 days.

Standard image High-resolution image
Figure 8.

Figure 8. Measured radial velocities and derived velocity curve for the G6 III binary HD 218527, whose period is 924 days.

Standard image High-resolution image

It is ironic that the 30 class IV stars, which Snowden & Young thought might be mostly binaries, has only 3 discovered binaries, but the 26 stars in Table 2 that include 14 supposed constant-velocity stars have 7 SBs.

3. The Evolutionary Status of the GK Subgiants

Are the subgiants off from the evolutionary tracks? Nearly all of the candidate stars in Table 1 have approximately solar metallicities, so they are mostly Population I. Columns 4 and 5 of Table 1 show that they occur in 3.66 < Log Teff < 3.77 and 0.0 < log L/L < 1.5. We can compare that region with the evolutionary tracks of Girardi et al. (2000), which were computed for stars with masses of 0.15–7 M and Z = 0.0004–0.03. That is shown in Figure 9 with the positions of the 30 subgiants superimposed on the tracks. Most of the stars fall on the evolutionary tracks. They originate on the MS from 0.9 M for HD 190360 to more than 1.9 M, and ages of about 1010 yr. Therefore there seems to be nothing unusual about the existence of G0-K1.5 IV stars.

Figure 9.

Figure 9. The lines are the evolutionary tracks by Girardi et al. (2000) for stars of masses of 0.6–1.9 M and Z = 0.03. The 30 dots represent the subgiants in Table 1. Nearly all of them fall on evolutionary tracks for masses of 0.9–1.9 M.

Standard image High-resolution image

This research has made use of the SIMBAD database operated at CDS Strasbourg, France. All of the new measures were provided by David W. Latham, but he was too busy with the Transiting Exoplanet Survey Satellite (TESS) plans to take part in the writing of this paper.

Please wait… references are loading.
10.3847/1538-3881/ab11c6