Cyclic phosphonium ionic liquids

  1. 1 ,
  2. 1,2 ,
  3. 3 ,
  4. 2 ,
  5. 1 ,
  6. 3,4 ,
  7. 1,2 ,
  8. 5 and
  9. 6
1Chemistry Department, Queensborough Community College of the City University of New York, 222-05 56th Avenue, Bayside, NY, 11364, USA, Fax: +1 718-281-5078, Tel: +1 718-281-5572
2Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Queens College of the City University of New York, 65-30 Kissena Boulevard, Flushing, NY, 11367, USA, Fax: +1 718-997-5531, Tel: +1 718-997-4106
3Chemistry Department, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, NY, 11973, USA, Fax: +1 631-344-5815, Tel: +1 631-344-4327
  1. Corresponding author email
Guest Editor: P. R. Hanson
Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2014, 10, 271–275. https://doi.org/10.3762/bjoc.10.22
Received 06 Aug 2013, Accepted 04 Jan 2014, Published 24 Jan 2014
Full Research Paper
cc by logo

Abstract

Ionic liquids (ILs) incorporating cyclic phosphonium cations are a novel category of materials. We report here on the synthesis and characterization of four new cyclic phosphonium bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)amide ILs with aliphatic and aromatic pendant groups. In addition to the syntheses of these novel materials, we report on a comparison of their properties with their ammonium congeners. These exemplars are slightly less conductive and have slightly smaller self-diffusion coefficients than their cyclic ammonium congeners.

Introduction

The most widely investigated and commercially available ionic liquids (ILs) are composed primarily of nitrogen-centered (particularly imidazolium, pyridinium, pyrrolidinium, and related quaternary ammonium) cations with a wide range of anions [1]. While a number of these ILs have been applied successfully to commercial processes [1], efforts are continually underway to synthesize ILs with improved properties (such as viscosity, thermal stability, melting point, etc.) to expand their applications into larger scale processes in diverse areas. Along that vein, phosphonium ILs have been observed to have favorable characteristics, including lower costs [2-6], lower viscosity (by ~50%) [7-11], greater thermal stability (by ~100 °C) [10-12], and wider electrochemical windows compared to their ammonium congeners. The family of ILs bearing cyclic cations (pyrrolidinium, piperidinium, and azepanium) [13,14] have been shown to have better transport and physical properties than most acyclic tetraalkylammonium salts. While cyclic phosphonium salts have been noted in patent applications [15], their characteristics have not been reported therein nor in journals, even though the comparisons noted above suggest those properties might be advantageous. To address such questions, we report here on the synthesis and physical characterization of some phosphonium analogues to pyrrolidinium and piperidinium ILs, i.e. phospholanium and phosphinanium ILs respectively.

The favorable stability of phosphonium ILs makes them good choices for applications where the IL would be exposed to extreme conditions, such as environmental exposure to high temperatures or exposure to extreme electromagnetic radiation (as in a dye-sensitized solar cell or ionizing radiation as in the recycling of spent nuclear fuel). ILs can play important roles in both of these latter areas [16]. While dialkylimidazolium ILs can be efficient extraction media for nuclear separations [17-19], the imidazolium cation is also a good acceptor of radiolytically produced excess electrons. The resultant radical participates in radiation damage mechanisms that alter the IL's properties [20]. On the other hand, phosphonium ILs, known for their durability and already made in large quantities, can be optimized for extraction of specific species from radioactive spent nuclear fuel. Inclusion of phenyl groups, as in two of the new ILs reported here, can stabilize excess charges (electrons or holes) leading to a more durable extraction system. The question of whether cyclic phosphonium ILs would succeed in solar photoconversion or spent fuel processing depends not only on whether their properties can be tuned to the application, but also whether their reactivity under extreme conditions can be managed.

A major challenge for this work has been the handling of the tertiary phosphine precursors, which are pyrophoric and extremely air sensitive. 1-n-Butylphospholane and 1-n-butylphosphinane were synthesized by the reaction of n-butyldichlorophosphine [21] with the appropriate bis-Grignard reagents, BrMg(CH2)4MgBr and BrMg(CH2)5MgBr respectively. The resultant cyclic phosphines are air sensitive and therefore were allowed to react with BH3·THF to provide the air-stable 1-n-butylphospholane–borane and 1-n-butylphosphinane–borane complexes that were purified by silica-gel chromatography. The pure compounds were then treated under nitrogen with 1,4-diazabicyclo[2.2.2]octane (DABCO) at 80 °C to remove the borane, and the resultant mixture was purified in a nitrogen-filled glove box on a short silica-gel column. The pure cyclic phosphines (1-n-butylphospholane and 1-n-butylphosphinane) were allowed to react immediately with iodomethane at room temperature to produce the 1-n-butyl-1-methylphospholanium iodide and 1-n-butyl-1-methylphosphinanium iodide, respectively. These materials were each mixed with an equivalent amount of lithium bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)amide (LiNTf2) in water at room temperature to produce the water-insoluble salts, 1-n-butyl-1-methylphospholanium bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)amide and the corresponding 1-n-butyl-1-methylphosphinanium bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)amide. In a corresponding manner were prepared the 1-phenylphospholane and the 1-phenylphosphinane by the reaction of dichlorophenylphosphine with the appropriate bis-Grignard reagents, BrMg(CH2)4MgBr and BrMg(CH2)5MgBr, respectively. The resulting five-membered cyclic 1-phenylphospholane was isolated in the same manner as was the 1-n-butylphospholane: i.e. by conversion with BH3·THF to give the air-stable 1-phenylphospholane–borane complex, followed by silica-gel chromatography and then removal of the borane with DABCO, to give the pure 1-phenylphospholane. The six-membered cyclic phosphine, which appears to be less air sensitive than the 1-butylphosphinane species, was purified in open air using a short column of silica gel. Both cyclic phosphines were each allowed to react with 1-bromobutane at reflux under nitrogen to give the 1-n-butyl-1-phenylphospholanium bromide (4c) and the 1-n-butyl-1-phenylphosphinanium bromide (4d), respectively. Each of these salts was then mixed with aqueous LiNTf2 to form the 1-n-butyl-1-phenylphospholanium bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)amide (5c) and the corresponding 1-n-butyl-1-phenylphosphinanium bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)amide (5d). The overall synthetic route is summarized in Scheme 1.

[1860-5397-10-22-i1]

Scheme 1: Reaction scheme for the preparation of cyclic phosphonium ionic liquids.

Results and Discussion

The conductivities, viscosities, self-diffusion coefficients and thermal properties of the phosphonium ILs 5a–d and their ammonium congeners are given in Table 1.

Table 1: Physical characteristics of cyclic phosphonium NTf2 ILs.a

Cationb Viscosity
cP
Conductivity
mS/cm
D+ (1H)
10−7 cm2/s
D (19F)
10−7 cm2/s
Tg
°C
Tm
°C
Td
°C
5a: C4mPphol+ 101 2.2 (23 °C) 1.27 1.01 −85 15 444
C4mPyrr+ 75 [22] 2.8 [22] 2.2 [23] (30 °C) 1.8 [23] (30 °C) −89 −8 [24] 431 [22]
5b: C4mPphin+ 171 0.92 0.65 0.68 −78 6 386
C4mPip+ 183 [25] 1.2 [25] 0.98 [25] 0.85 [25] −77 [26] −25c 400 [25]
5c: C4PhPphol+ 223 −66 29 422
5d: C4PhPphin+ 48 (75 °C) 13.3 (76 °C) 1.56 (75 °C) 2.47 (75 °C) −48 54 387

aAll values are for measurements at 25 °C except where noted. Viscosities are calculated from VFT fits. All glass-transition temperatures (Tg) and melting points (Tm) are onset temperatures. Water contents of samples ranged from 76–155 ppm. Uncertainties of viscosities, conductivities, diffusion coefficients (D+ and D) are 1 cP, 7%, 5% and 1 °C respectively. Td is the thermal decomposition temperature. bAbbreviations and structures of ammonium congeners: NTf2 - bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)amide anion; C4mPphol - butylmethylphospholanium; C4mPyrr - butylmethylpyrrolidinium; C4mPphin - butylmethylphosphinanium; C4mPip - butylmethylpiperidinium; C4PhPphol - butylphenylphospholanium; C4PhPphin - butylphenylphosphinanium.
[Graphic 1]
cValue subject to dispute, either −25 °C [25] or just below 0 °C [27].

Comparison of the five-membered cyclic cation ILs C4mPphol NTf2 5a and C4mPyrr NTf2 (butylmethylpyrrolidinium NTf2) reveals that the viscosity of the phosphonium salt is one third higher than that of the ammonium salt (101 cP vs 75 cP at 25 °C). For the six-membered rings the phosphonium IL C4mPphin NTf2 5b is slightly less viscous than C4mPip NTf2 (butylmethylpiperidinium NTf2), 171 cP vs 183 cP. Interestingly, the cyclic cations do not follow the common trend among the quaternary tetra-n-alkylated cations wherein the room temperature viscosities of the phosphonium salts are approximately one-half of those of their ammonium congeners [7-11]. This difference draws attention to the particular role that the cyclic alkyl functionality plays in IL fluid dynamics in contrast to two linear chains. This topic merits further exploration via molecular dynamics simulations [28] and physical studies such as NMR diffusion measurements, nuclear Overhauser effect spectroscopies, and quasi-elastic neutron scattering. As seen for instance for the cyclic ammonium salts, the viscosities of the cyclic phosphonium salts increase with increasing ring size for two of the compounds synthesized. As suggested by the viscosity results, the conductivities of the phosphonium ILs are lower than those for their ammonium congeners, and that for both families they decrease with increasing ring size. The conductivity of C4mPphol NTf2 (2.2 mS/cm) is slightly smaller than that of the C4mPyrr (2.8 mS/cm) although not as much as expected from the viscosity difference. The self-diffusion coefficients of the anion (D) and the cation (D+) are somewhat lower for the phosphonium salts than the ammonium ones. Interestingly, despite its slightly lower viscosity, C4mPphin IL has lower diffusion coefficients than C4mPip NTf2.

For the P-versus-N pairs where direct comparisons can be made, the glass-transition temperatures Tg are very close, allowing for experimental differences. In contradiction to the trend for linear tetraalkyl cations, the melting temperatures (Tm) for the cyclic phosphonium salts are higher than those of their cyclic ammonium congeners. C4mPphol NTf2 melts 23 °C higher than does C4mPyrr NTf2, and C4mPphin NTf2 melts 31 °C higher than does C4mPip NTf2. Henderson and Passerini [29] showed that the often-cited Tm of −18 °C for C4mPyrr NTf2 was due to a metastable crystalline form by using an annealing process. The DSC scan of un-annealed C4mPphol NTf2 shows all the thermal features exhibited by un-annealed C4mPyrr NTf2 (glass transition, cold crystallization, solid–solid transition, and melting). When the recommended annealing method [24] was applied to C4mPphol NTf2 the first three thermal features listed just above were eliminated, but the position of the melting point did not change. The apparent thermal decomposition temperature (Td) of the cyclic phosphonium NTf2 ILs are not particularly different from those of the cyclic ammonium NTf2 ILs, which is similar to the situation of linear alkyl quaternary cation ILs [11]. In some instances where the anion is nucleophilic, such as with dicyanamide [12], or the leaving group is resonance-stabilized, such as a benzyl radical [10], the phosphonium cations have greater thermal stability than the ammonium ones. One trend observed for both cation types is that the ILs with five-membered rings have greater thermal stability than those with six-membered rings. Further work will be required to determine if the observed TGA behaviors are due to actual decomposition or to volatility of the ILs [30].

While developing our synthetic approach to the aliphatic C4mPphol+ and C4mPphin+ cations, which requires the use of highly air-sensitive reagents and intermediates as described above, we refined our techniques using less reactive phenylphosphines. The resulting butylphenylphospholanium (C4PhPphol NTf2) and butylphenylphosphinanium (C4PhPphin NTf2) ionic liquids are examples of a rare class of ILs with direct attachment of the aryl group to the cationic center. We were unable to find any information on ILs containing analogous nitrogen-centered cations for comparison, although ILs with aryl groups attached directly to the nitrogen atoms of imidazolium cations are reported [31]. The melting points of the phenylphosphonium ILs are both above room temperature (see Table 1), however C4PhPphol NTf2 is persistently metastable as a supercooled liquid under ambient conditions. The most significant effects observed for the replacement of a methyl group with a phenyl ring in this family of cations are the substantial increases of 19 °C and 30 °C in the glass-transition temperatures for the 5- and 6-membered ring cations respectively. Similar effects on Tg have been reported for other classes of ILs bearing benzyl groups [32]. This family of cations may have the useful attributes for reducing radiation-induced damage of the IL owing to the stabilization of excess charges on the phenyl groups.

Conclusion

We have successfully prepared a series of new cyclic phosphonium ILs that are representatives of a wide class of potentially useful ILs. These exemplars are slightly less conductive and have slightly smaller self-diffusion coefficients than their cyclic ammonium congeners. Their viscosities are also lower than their ammonium congeners. In other instances, such as the peculiarities in melting point and viscosity trends of the C-2-methylated imidazolium salts [33], ether-substituted ILs [34], and bis(oxalato)borate salts [35], detailed investigation into those intriguing behaviors led to deeper insights into the dynamical workings of ILs that have had important impacts on the field. For this reason we will continue to explore cyclic phosphonium ILs through synthesis of a wider variety of structural types and substituents, variation of anions, and more extensive characterization of their physical, structural, and dynamical properties. In particular, this family of ILs, by comparison with the more familiar cyclic ammonium ILs, should reveal the dynamical effects of cyclic vs linear alkyl chains on the physical properties of ionic liquids.

Supporting Information

Detailed synthesis and characterization procedures are provided for all compounds synthesized and characterized. NMR spectra are provided for all compounds for which NMR data is reported. DSC thermograms are provided for the bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)amide ionic liquids (5a5d).

Supporting Information File 1: NMR Spectra.
Format: PDF Size: 338.0 KB Download
Supporting Information File 2: DSC Thermograms.
Format: PDF Size: 138.2 KB Download
Supporting Information File 3: Experimental.
Format: PDF Size: 177.3 KB Download

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the office of Educational Programs at Brookhaven National Laboratory and the NSF NYC Louis Stokes Alliance for Minority Participation program for student internship support. This work was supported by the City University of New York Energy Institute, the Professional Staff Congress of the City University of New York (PSC-CUNY) Research Award Program - 43 and the U. S. Department of Energy, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Division of Chemical Sciences Geosciences and Biosciences under contract # DE-AC02-98CH10886.

References

  1. Plechkova, N. V.; Seddon, K. R. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2008, 37, 123–150. doi:10.1039/b006677j
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  2. Wasserscheid, P.; Welton, T. Ionic Liquids in Synthesis, 2nd ed.; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, 2008. doi:10.1002/9783527621194
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  3. Ohno, H. Electrochemical Aspects of Ionic Liquids, 2nd ed.; John Wiley & Sons, Inc.: Hoboken, USA, 2011. doi:10.1002/9781118003350
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  4. MacFarlane, D. R.; Meakin, P.; Amini, N.; Forsyth, M. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 2001, 13, 8257–8267. doi:10.1088/0953-8984/13/36/303
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  5. Kim, K.; Lang, C. M.; Kohl, P. A. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2005, 152, E56–E60. doi:10.1149/1.1850335
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  6. Bradaric, C. J.; Downard, A.; Kennedy, C.; Robertson, A. J.; Zhou, Y. Green Chem. 2003, 5, 143–152. doi:10.1039/b209734f
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  7. Seki, S.; Hayamizu, K.; Tsuzuki, S.; Fujii, K.; Umebayashi, Y.; Mitsugi, T.; Kobayashi, T.; Ohno, Y.; Kobayashi, Y.; Mita, Y.; Miyashiro, H.; Ishiquro, S.-i. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2009, 11, 3509–3514. doi:10.1039/b820343a
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  8. Shirota, H.; Fukazawa, H.; Fujisawa, T.; Wishart, J. F. J. Phys. Chem. B 2010, 114, 9400–9412. doi:10.1021/jp1021104
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  9. Tsunashima, K.; Kawabata, A.; Matsumiya, M.; Kodama, S.; Enomoto, R.; Sugiya, M.; Kunugi, Y. Electrochem. Commun. 2011, 13, 178–181. doi:10.1016/j.elecom.2010.12.007
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  10. Tsunashima, K.; Niwa, E.; Kodama, S.; Sugiya, M.; Ono, Y. J. Phys. Chem. B 2009, 113, 15870–15874. doi:10.1021/jp908356c
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2] [3] [4]
  11. Tsunashima, K.; Sugiya, M. Electrochem. Commun. 2007, 9, 2353–2358. doi:10.1016/j.elecom.2007.07.003
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2] [3] [4]
  12. Tsunashima, K.; Kodama, S.; Sugiya, M.; Kunugi, Y. Electrochim. Acta 2010, 56, 762–766. doi:10.1016/j.electacta.2010.08.106
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  13. MacFarlane, D. R.; Meakin, P.; Sun, J.; Amini, N.; Forsyth, M. J. Phys. Chem. B 1999, 103, 4164–4170. doi:10.1021/jp984145s
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  14. Belhocine, T.; Forsyth, S. A.; Gunaratne, H. Q. N.; Nieuwenhuyzen, M.; Puga, A. V.; Seddon, K. R.; Srinivasan, G.; Whiston, K. Green Chem. 2011, 13, 59–63. doi:10.1039/c0gc00534g
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  15. Hawkins, J. A.; Hudgins, D. A.; Irwin, L. J. Phosphonium ionic liquids, compositions, methods of making and electronic devices formed there from. U.S. Patent Appl. US2010/0118598 A1, May 13, 2010.
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  16. Wishart, J. F. Energy Environ. Sci. 2009, 2, 956–961. doi:10.1039/B906273D
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  17. Cocalia, V. A.; Gutowski, K. E.; Rogers, R. D. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2006, 250, 755–764. doi:10.1016/j.ccr.2005.09.019
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  18. Gutowski, K. E.; Bridges, N. J.; Cocalia, V. A.; Spear, S.K.; Visser, A. E.; Holbrey, J. D.; Davis, J. H., Jr.; Rogers, R. D. Ionic Liquid Technologies for Utilization in Nuclear-Based Separations. In Ionic Liquids IIIB: Fundamentals, Progress, Challenges and Opportunities: Transformations and Processes; Rogers, R. D.; Seddon, K. R., Eds.; American Chemical Society: Washington, 2005; Vol. 902, pp 33–48. doi:10.1021/bk-2005-0902.ch003
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  19. Binnemans, K. Chem. Rev. 2007, 107, 2592–2614. doi:10.1021/cr050979c
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  20. Shkrob, I. A.; Wishart, J. F. J. Phys. Chem. B 2009, 113, 5582–5592. doi:10.1021/jp811495e
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  21. Fox, R. B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1950, 72, 4147–4149. doi:10.1021/ja01165a085
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  22. Tokuda, H.; Ishii, K.; Abu Bin Hasan Susan, M.; Tsuzuki, S.; Hayamizu, K.; Watanabe, M. J. Phys. Chem. B 2006, 110, 2833–2839. doi:10.1021/jp053396f
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2] [3]
  23. Tokuda, H.; Tsuzuki, S.; Abu Bin Hasan Susan, M.; Hayamizu, K.; Watanabe, M. J. Phys. Chem. B 2006, 110, 19593–19600. doi:10.1021/jp064159v
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  24. Furlani, M.; Albinsson, I.; Mellander, B.-E.; Appetecchi, G. B.; Passerini, S. Electrochim. Acta 2011, 57, 220–227. doi:10.1016/j.electacta.2011.08.056
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  25. Bazito, F. F. C.; Kawano, Y.; Torresi, R. M. Electrochim. Acta 2007, 52, 6427–6437. doi:10.1016/j.electacta.2007.04.064
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6]
  26. Zhou, Z.-B.; Matsumoto, H.; Tatsumi, K. Chem.–Eur. J. 2006, 12, 2196–2212. doi:10.1002/chem.200500930
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  27. Triolo, A.; Russina, O.; Fazio, B.; Appetecchi, G. B.; Carewska, M.; Passerini, S. J. Chem. Phys. 2009, 130, 164521. doi:10.1063/1.3119977
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  28. Lopes, J. N. C.; Shimizu, K.; Padua, A. A. H.; Umebayashi, Y.; Fukuda, S.; Fujii, K.; Ishiguro, S.-i. J. Phys. Chem. B 2008, 112, 1465–1472. doi:10.1021/jp076997a
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  29. Henderson, W. A.; Passerini, S. Chem. Mater. 2004, 16, 2881–2885. doi:10.1021/cm049942j
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  30. Heym, F.; Etzold, B. J. M.; Kern, C.; Jess, A. Green Chem. 2011, 13, 1453–1466. doi:10.1039/c0gc00876a
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  31. Ahrens, S.; Peritz, A.; Strassner, T. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 7908–7910. doi:10.1002/anie.200903399
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  32. Lall-Ramnarine, S. I.; Hatcher, J.; Castano, A.; Thomas, M. F.; Wishart, J. F. ECS Trans. 2010, 33, 659–665. doi:10.1149/1.3484823
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  33. Hunt, P. A. J. Phys. Chem. B 2007, 111, 4844–4853. doi:10.1021/jp067182p
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  34. Lee, H. Y.; Shirota, H.; Castner, E. W., Jr. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2013, 4, 1477–1483. doi:10.1021/jz400465x
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  35. Lall-Ramnarine, S. I.; Castano, A.; Subramaniam, G.; Thomas, M. F.; Wishart, J. F. Radiat. Phys. Chem. 2009, 78, 1120–1125. doi:10.1016/j.radphyschem.2009.02.007
    Return to citation in text: [1]
Other Beilstein-Institut Open Science Activities