Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The cued recognition task: dissociating the abrupt onset effect from the social and arrow cueing effect

  • Published:
Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In a standard center cueing paradigm, participants are asked to identify a target object presented either to the left or the right of a center cue (e.g., eye gaze, head-turn, arrow, etc.). When the center cue is non-predictive (e.g., the arrow points to the correct location of the target only 50 % of the time), the target can still be identified faster at the validly cued location than at the invalidly cued location. However, the abrupt onset of an object can elicit reflexive attention orientation. It is important to investigate whether this abrupt onset effect interferes with the cueing effect elicited by center cues because this interference effect, if it exists, should be controlled for in order to improve the test validity of the center cueing task. In an attentional cueing paradigm, we examined how the abrupt appearance of an exogenous target object mitigates the influence of center cues involving either a head turn (Experiment 1) or an arrow (Experiment 2). In Experiment 1, a non-predictive head-turn cue was followed by a target object (circle or square) presented in the left or right visual field. In the non-distractor condition, the target object was presented by itself. In this case, it is assumed that the sudden appearance of the target provides an orienting cue to the observer. To equalize the cueing effect of the target object, we presented a competing distractor object (triangle) in the opposite visual field to the target object. The participant’s task was to categorize the target object as either a circle or square while ignoring the non-target triangle object in the opposite visual field. In Experiment 2, the arrow version of the cued recognition task was used, in which a single-headed arrow pointed to the object. The results from both experiments showed that both the non-predictive head-turn and arrow cues produced a reliable cueing effect in the distractor and non-distractor conditions. However, the magnitude of the cueing effect was greater in the distractor condition than in the non-distractor condition, suggesting that the abrupt onset of the target object acts like an exogenous signal, thereby reducing the impact of the internal head turn and arrow cues.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Briand, K. A., Larrison, A. L., & Sereno, A. B. (2000). Inhibition of return in manual and saccadic response systems. Perception & Psychophysics, 62(8), 1512–1524.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brignani, D., Guzzon, D., Marzi, C. A., & Miniussi, C. (2009). Attentional orienting induced by arrows and eye-gaze compared with an endogenous cue. Neuropsychologia, 47(2), 370–381.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Castel, A. D., Pratt, J., Chasteen, A. L., & Scialfa, C. T. (2005). Examining task difficulty and the time course of inhibition of return: Detecting perceptually degraded targets. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue Canadienne de Psychologie Expérimentale, 59(2), 90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chawarska, K., Klin, A., & Volkmar, F. (2003). Automatic attention cueing through eye movement in 2-year-old children with autism. Child Development, 74(4), 1108–1122.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cheal, M., & Lyon, D. R. (1991). Central and peripheral precuing of forced-choice discrimination. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 43(4), 859–880.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Driver, J., IV, Davis, G., Ricciardelli, P., Kidd, P., Maxwell, E., & Baron-Cohen, S. (1999). Gaze perception triggers reflexive visuospatial orienting. Visual Cognition, 6(5), 509–540.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eimer, M. (1997). Uninformative symbolic cues may bias visual-spatial attention: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. Biological Psychology, 46(1), 67–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Farroni, T., Massaccesi, S., Pividori, D., & Johnson, M. H. (2004). Gaze following in newborns. Infancy, 5(1), 39–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friesen, C. K., & Kingstone, A. (1998). The eyes have it! Reflexive orienting is triggered by nonpredictive gaze. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 5(3), 490–495.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friesen, C. K., Moore, C., & Kingstone, A. (2005). Does gaze direction really trigger a reflexive shift of spatial attention? Brain and Cognition, 57(1), 66–69.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Friesen, C. K., Ristic, J., & Kingstone, A. (2004). Attentional effects of counterpredictive gaze and arrow cues. Journal of Experimental Psychology-Human Perception and Performance, 30(2), 319–329.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, M. C., Mostow, A. J., Vecera, S. P., Larson, J. C. G., Mostofsky, S. H., Mahone, E. M., & Denckla, M. B. (2008). Evidence for impairments in using static line drawings of eye gaze cues to orient visual-spatial attention in children with high functioning autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 38(8), 1405–1413.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Greene, D. J., Colich, N., Iacoboni, M., Zaidel, E., Bookheimer, S. Y., & Dapretto, M. (2011). Atypical neural networks for social orienting in autism spectrum disorders. NeuroImage, 56(1), 354–362.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hommel, B., Pratt, J., Colzato, L., & Godijn, R. (2001). Symbolic control of visual attention. Psychological Science, 12(5), 360–365.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hood, B. M., Willen, J. D., & Driver, J. (1998). Adult's eyes trigger shifts of visual attention in human infants. Psychological Science, 9(2), 131–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, M. H., Griffin, R., Csibra, G., Halit, H., Farroni, T., De Haan, M., … & Richards, J. (2005). The emergence of the social brain network: evidence from typical and atypical development. Development and Psychopathology, 17(3), 599–619.

  • Jonides, J. (1981). Voluntary versus automatic control over the mind’s eye’s movement. In J. B. Long & A. D. Baddeley (Eds.), Attention and performance IX (pp. 187–203). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khatoon, S., Briand, K. A., & Sereno, A. B. (2002). The role of response in spatial attention: Direct versus indirect stimulus–response mappings. Vision Research, 42(24), 2693–2708.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Klein, R., Kingstone, A., & Pontefract, A. (1992). Orienting of visual attention. In Eye movements and visual cognition (pp. 46–65). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, G., & Benson, V. (2007). The influence of eye-gaze and arrow pointing distractor cues on voluntary eye movements. Perception & Psychophysics, 69(6), 966–971.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, G., Benson, V., Fletcher-Watson, S., Kovshoff, H., McCormick, C. A., Kirkby, J., & Leekam, S. R. (2010). Eye movements affirm: Automatic overt gaze and arrow cueing for typical adults and adults with autism spectrum disorder. Experimental Brain Research, 201(2), 155–165.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kylliäinen, A., & Hietanen, J. K. (2004). Attention orienting by another’s gaze direction in children with autism. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 45(3), 435–444.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Langton, S. R., & Bruce, V. (1999). Reflexive visual orienting in response to the social attention of others. Visual Cognition, 6(5), 541–567.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Los, S. A. (1996). On the origin of mixing costs: Exploring information processing in pure and mixed blocks of trials. Acta Psychologica, 94(2), 145–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Los, S. A. (1999). Identifying stimuli of different perceptual categories in pure and mixed blocks of trials: Evidence for stimulus-driven switch costs. Acta Psycologica, 103(1), 173–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lupiáñez, J., Milán, E. G., Tornay, F. J., Madrid, E., & Tudela, P. (1997). Does IOR occur in discrimination tasks? Yes, it does, but later. Perception & Psychophysics, 59(8), 1241–1254.

  • Marotta, A., Casagrande, M., & Lupiáñez, J. (2013). Object-based attentional effects in response to eye-gaze and arrow cues. Acta Psychologica, 143(3), 317–321.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Marotta, A., Lupiáñez, J., Martella, D., & Casagrande, M. (2012). Eye gaze versus arrows as spatial cues: Two qualitatively different modes of attentional selection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 38(2), 326.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Müller, H. J., & Findlay, J. M. (1988). The effect of visual attention of peripheral discrimination thresholds in single and multiple element displays. Acta Psychologica, 69(2), 129–155.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Müller, H. J., & Rabbitt, P. M. (1989). Reflexive and voluntary orienting of visual attention: Time course of activation and resistance to interruption. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15(2), 315–330.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Posner, M. I. (1980). Orienting of attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 32, 3–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Posner, M. I., & Cohen, Y. (1984). Components of visual orienting. Attention and Performance X: Control of Language Processes, 32, 531–556.

    Google Scholar 

  • Posner, M. I., Cohen, Y., & Rafal, R. D. (1982). Neural systems control of spatial orienting. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. B, Biological Sciences, 298(1089), 187–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Posner, M. I., Snyder, C. R., & Davidson, B. J. (1980). Attention and the detection of signals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 109(2), 160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pratt, J., & Hommel, B. (2003). Symbolic control of visual attention: The role of working memory and attentional control settings. Journal of Experimental Psychology-Human Perception and Performance, 29(5), 835–844.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pruett, J. R., Jr., LaMacchia, A., Hoertel, S., Squire, E., McVey, K., Todd, R. D., & Petersen, S. E. (2011). Social and non-social cueing of visuospatial attention in autism and typical development. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 41(6), 715–731.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Remington, R. W., Johnston, J. C., & Yantis, S. (1992). Involuntary attentional capture by abrupt onsets. Perception & Psychophysics, 51(3), 279–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ristic, J., Friesen, C. K., & Kingstone, A. (2002). Are eyes special? It depends on how you look at it. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9(3), 507–513.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ristic, J., Mottron, L., Friesen, C. K., Iarocci, G., Burack, J. A., & Kingstone, A. (2005). Eyes are special but not for everyone: The case of autism. Cognitive Brain Research, 24(3), 715–718.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ristic, J., Wright, A., & Kingstone, A. (2007). Attentional control and reflexive orienting to gaze and arrow cues. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14(5), 964–969.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rombough, A. H., Barrie, J. N., & Iarocci, G. (2012). Social cueing elicits a distinct form of visual spatial orienting. In J. A. Burack, J. T. Enns, & N. A. Fox (Eds.), Cognitive science, development, and psychopathology: Typical and atypical developmental trajectories of attention (pp. 221–250). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Rombough, A., & Iarocci, G. (2012). Orienting in response to gaze and the social use of gaze among children with autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 43(7), 1584–1596.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scaife, M., & Bruner, J. S. (1975). The capacity for joint visual attention in the infant. Nature, 253(5489), 265–266.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Senju, A., Tojo, Y., Dairoku, H., & Hasegawa, T. (2004). Reflexive orienting in response to eye gaze and an arrow in children with and without autism. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 45(3), 445–458.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shepherd, M., Findlay, J. M., & Hockey, R. J. (1986). The relationship between eye movements and spatial attention. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 38(3), 475–491.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stauder, J. E., Bosch, C., & Nuij, H. A. (2011). Atypical visual orienting to eye gaze and arrow cues in children with high functioning Autism Spectrum Disorder. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 5(2), 742–748.

  • Swettenham, J., Condie, S., Campbell, R., Milne, E., & Coleman, M. (2003). Does the perception of moving eyes trigger reflexive visual orienting in autism? Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 358(1430), 325–334.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, T. L., & Klein, R. M. (1998). On the causes and effects of inhibition of return. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 5(4), 625–643.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tipples, J. (2002). Eye gaze is not unique: Automatic orienting in response to uninformative arrows. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9(2), 314–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tipples, J. (2008a). Negative emotionality influences the effects of emotion on time perception. Emotion, 8(1), 127.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tipples, J. (2008b). Orienting to counterpredictive gaze and arrow cues. Perception & Psychophysics, 70(1), 77–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vlamings, P. H., Stauder, J. E., van Son, I. A., & Mottron, L. (2005). Atypical visual orienting to gaze-and arrow-cues in adults with high functioning autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 35(3), 267–277.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by grants from the Chinese Scholarship Council, the Temporal Dynamics of Learning Center (NSF Grant #SBE-0542013), National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NIH Grant HD-46526) and the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council. We would like to thank Kristy Mineault and Thomas Rogers for collecting the data, and Jennifer MacSween and Dr. Travis Baker for being the models in the stimulus of the Cued Recognition Task.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, University of Victoria, Victoria, British Columbia, V8W 2Y2, Canada

    Buyun Xu & James W. Tanaka

Authors
  1. Buyun Xu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. James W. Tanaka
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Buyun Xu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Xu, B., Tanaka, J.W. The cued recognition task: dissociating the abrupt onset effect from the social and arrow cueing effect. Atten Percept Psychophys 77, 97–110 (2015). https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-014-0763-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-014-0763-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation