Abstract
Consonants and vowels may play different roles during language processing, consonants being preferentially involved in lexical processing, and vowels tending to mark syntactic constituency through prosodic cues. In support of this view, artificial language learning studies have demonstrated that consonants (C) support statistical computations, whereas vowels (V) allow certain structural generalizations. Nevertheless, these asymmetries could be mere by-products of lower level acoustic differences between Cs and Vs, in particular the energy they carry, and thus their relative salience. Here we address this issue and show that vowels remain the preferred targets for generalizations, even when consonants are made highly salient or vowels barely audible. Participants listened to speech streams of nonsense CVCVCV words, in which consonants followed a simple ABA structure. Participants failed to generalize this structure over sonorant consonants (Experiment 1), even when vowel duration was reduced to one third of that of consonants (Experiment 2). When vowels were eliminated from the stream, participants showed only a marginal evidence of generalizations (Experiment 4). In contrast, participants readily generalized the structure over barely audible vowels (Experiment 3). These results show that different roles of consonants and vowels cannot be readily reduced to acoustical and perceptual differences between these phonetic categories.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aslin, R., Saffran, J., & Newport, L. (1998). Computation of conditional probability statistics by 8-month-old infants. Psychological Science, 9, 321–324.
Benzeghiba, M., De Mori, R., Deroo, O., Dupont, S., Erbes, T., Jouvet, D., et al. (2007). Automatic speech recognition and speech variability: A review. Speech Communication, 49, 763–786.
Bonatti, L. L., Peña, M., Nespor, M., & Mehler, J. (2005). Linguistic constraints on statistical computations: The role of consonants and vowels in continuous speech processing. Psychological Science, 16, 451–459.
Bonatti, L. L., Peña, M., Nespor, M., & Mehler, J. (2007). On consonants, vowels, chickens, and eggs. Psychological Science, 18, 924–925.
Caramazza, A., Chialant, D., Capasso, R., & Miceli, G. (2000). Separable processing of consonants and vowels. Nature, 403, 428–430.
Chomsky, N. (1980). Rules and representations. Oxford: Blackwell.
Christophe, A., Nespor, M., Guasti, M. T., & Van Ooyen, B. (2003). Prosodic structure and syntactic acquisition: The case of the head-direction parameter. Developmental Science, 6, 211–220.
Clements, N. (in press). Does sonority have a phonetic basis? Comments on the chapter by Vaux. In E. Raimy & C. Cairns (Eds.), Contemporary views on architecture and representations in phonological theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Cutler, A., Sebastián-Gallés, N., Soler-Vilageliu, O., & van Ooijen, B. (2000). Constraints of vowels and consonants on lexical selection: Cross-linguistic comparisons. Memory & Cognition, 28, 746–755.
Dehaene-Lambertz, G., Pallier, C., Serniclaes, W., Sprenger-Charolles, L., Jobert, A., & Dehaene, S. (2005). Neural correlates of switching from auditory to speech perception. NeuroImage, 24, 21–33.
Dutoit, T., Pagel, V., Pierret, N., Bataille, F., & van der Vrecken, O. (1996, October). The MBROLA project: Towards a set of high-quality speech synthesizers free of use for non-commercial purposes. Paper presented at the proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Spoken Language Processing, Philadelphia.
Elman, J. L., Bates, E. A., Johnson, M. H., Karmiloff-Smith, A., Parisi, D., & Plunkett, K. (1996). Rethinking innateness: A connectionist perspective on development. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Endress, A., & Bonatti, L. (2007). Rapid learning of syllable classes from a perceptually continuous speech stream. Cognition, 105, 247–299.
Endress, A., Dehaene-Lambertz, G., & Mehler, J. (2007). Perceptual constraints and the learnability of simple grammars. Cognition, 105, 577–614.
Endress, A., Scholl, B., & Mehler, J. (2005). The role of salience in the extraction of algebraic rules. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 134, 406–419.
Garcia, J., Hankins, W. G., & Rusiniak, K. W. (1974). Behavioral regulation of the milieu interne in man and rat. Science, 185, 824–831.
Gillette, J., Gleitman, H., Gleitman, L., & Lederer, A. (1999). Human simulations of vocabulary learning. Cognition, 73, 135–176.
Gleitman, L. R., & Wanner, E. (1982). Language acquisition: The state of the state of the art. In E. Wanner & L. R. Gleitman (Eds.), Language acquisition: The state of the art (pp. 3–48). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gómez, R., Gerken, L., & Schvaneveldt, R. (2000). The basis of transfer in artificial grammar learning. Memory & Cognition, 28, 253–263.
Keidel, J. S., Jenison, R. L., Kluender, K. R., & Seidenberg, M. S. (2007). Does grammar constrain statistical learning? Commentary on Bonatti et al. (2005). Psychological Science, 18, 922–923.
Knobel, M., & Caramazza, A. (2007). Evaluating computational models in cognitive neuropsychology: The case from the consonant/ vowel distinction. Brain & Language, 100, 95–100.
Ladefoged, P. (2001). Vowels and consonants: An introduction to the sounds of language. Oxford: Blackwell.
Ladefoged, P. (2006). A course in phonetics (5th ed.). Boston: Wadsworth.
Mani, N., & Plunkett, K. (2007). Phonological specificity of vowels and consonants in early lexical representations. Journal of Memory & Language, 57, 252–272.
McCarthy, J. J. (1979). Formal problems in Semitic phonology and morphology. Doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, MA.
McClelland, J. L., Rumelhart, D. E., & the PDP Research Group (EDS.) (1986). Parallel distributed processing, Vol. 2: Psychological and biological models. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Mehler, J., Dupoux, E., Nazzi, T., & Dehaene-Lambertz, G. (1996). Coping with linguistic diversity: The infant's viewpoint. In J. L. Morgan & K. Demuth (Eds.), Signal to syntax (pp. 101–116). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Mehler, J., Peña, M., Nespor, M., & Bonatti, L. L. (2006). The “soul” of language does not use statistics: Reflections on vowels and consonants. Cortex, 42, 846–854.
Monaghan, P., & Shillcock, R. (2003). Connectionist modeling of the separable processing of consonants and vowels. Brain & Language, 86, 83–98.
Monaghan, P., & Shillcock, R. (2007). Levels of description in consonant/vowel processing: Reply to Knobel and Caramazza. Brain & Language, 100, 101–108.
Morgan, J. L., & Demuth, K. (1996). Signal to syntax: Bootstrapping from speech to grammar in early acquisition. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Möttönen, R., Calvert, G., Jääskeläinen, I., Matthews, P, Thesen, T., Tuomainen, J., & Sams, M. (2006). Perceiving identical sounds as speech or non-speech modulates activity in the left posterior superior temporal sulcus. NeuroImage, 30, 563–569.
Nazzi, T. (2005). Use of phonetic specificity during the acquisition of new words: Differences between consonants and vowels. Cognition, 98, 13–30.
Nazzi, T., & New, B. (2007). Beyond stop consonants: Consonantal specificity in early lexical acquisition. Cognitive Development, 22, 271–279.
Nespor, M., Peña, M., & Mehler, J. (2003). On the different roles of vowels and consonants in speech processing and language acquisition. Lingue & Linguaggio, 2, 201–227.
Nespor, M., & Vogel, I. (1986). Prosodic phonology. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Foris.
Newport, E. L., & Aslin, R. N. (2004). Learning at a distance I. Statistical learning of non-adjacent dependencies. Cognitive Psychology, 48, 127–162.
Newport, E. L., Hauser, M. D., Spaepen, G., & Aslin, R. N. (2004). Learning at a distance II. Statistical learning of non-adjacent dependencies in a non-human primate. Cognitive Psychology, 49, 85–117.
Owren, M. J., & Cardillo, G. C. (2006). The relative roles of vowels and consonants in discriminating talker identity versus word meaning. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 119, 1727–1739.
Pinker, S. (1999). Words and rules: The ingredients of language. New York: Harper Collins.
Saffran, J., Aslin, R., & Newport, E. (1996). Statistical learning by 8-month-old infants. Science, 274, 1926–1928.
Selkirk, E. (1974). French liaison and the \(\bar X\) notation. Linguistic Inquiry, 5, 573–590.
Sharp, D., Scott, S., Cutler, A., & Wise, R. (2005). Lexical retrieval constrained by sound structure: The role of the left inferior frontal gyrus. Brain & Language, 92, 309–319.
Tomasello, M. (2000). The item-based nature of children's early syntactic development. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 156–163.
Toro, J. M., Nespor, M., Mehler, J., & Bonatti, L. (2008). Finding words and rules in a speech stream: Functional differences between vowels and consonants. Psychological Science, 19, 137–144.
Tunney, R., & Altmann, G. (2001). Two modes of transfer in artificial grammar learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 27, 614–639.
van Ooijen, B. (1996). Vowel mutability and lexical selection in English: Evidence from a word reconstruction task. Memory & Cognition, 24, 573–583.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This research was funded by McDonnell Foundation Grant 21002089; by CEE Special Targeted Project CALACEI (Contract 12778, NEST); by the Mind, Brain, and Behavior Interfaculty Initiative at Harvard University; and by PRIN2005 to M.N.
Note—Accepted by the editorial board of Editor-Elect Jeremy M. Wolfe.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Toro, J.M., Shukla, M., Nespor, M. et al. The quest for generalizations over consonants: Asymmetries between consonants and vowels are not the by-product of acoustic differences. Perception & Psychophysics 70, 1515–1525 (2008). https://doi.org/10.3758/PP.70.8.1515
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/PP.70.8.1515