Abstract
Letter search (LS) on the prime typically eliminates semantic priming (swim-float) and orthographic/phonological (O/P) priming (coat-float) but not morphological priming (marked-mark). However, LS on the prime does not reduce semantic priming for low-frequency targets (Tse & Neely, 2007). These findings suggest that semantic activation survives LS but decays during LS to a low level that can be detected only with sensitive measures, which are afforded by low-frequency targets and morphologically related primes and targets. In the present research, we show that LS on the prime results in 0 msec of semantic priming (e.g., swim-float) and 11 msec of O/P priming (e.g., coat-float), both of which are statistically null, whereas the LS semantic+O/P priming effect for primes and targets that do not share a morpheme (e.g., boat-float) is a robust 37 msec. Discussion focuses on the automaticity of semantic activation and whether morphological priming is mediated by (1) a morphemic representation that is separate from semantic representations or (2) activation combined from semantics and orthography/phonology.
Article PDF
References
Besner, D., Stolz, J. A., & Holcomb, P. (2005). On the persisting myth of automatic semantic activation in visual word recognition: What N400 doesn’t measure. Unpublished manuscript.
Brown, M. S., Roberts, M. A., & Besner, D. (2001). Semantic processing in visual word recognition: Activation blocking and domain specificity. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 778–784.
Brown, M. [S.], Stolz, J. A., & Besner, D. (2006). Dissociative effects of stimulus quality on semantic and morphological contexts in visual word recognition. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60, 190–199.
Chiappe, P. R., Smith, M. C., & Besner, D. (1996). Semantic priming in visual word recognition: Activation blocking and domains of processing. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 3, 249–253.
Feldman, L. B. (2000). Are morphological effects distinguishable from the effects of shared meaning and shared form? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 26, 1431–1444.
Ferguson, R., & Besner, D. (2006). Basic processes in reading: Can functional phonological recoding be blocked? Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60, 148–158.
Heil, M., Rolke, B., & Pecchinenda, A. (2004). Automatic semantic activation is no myth: Semantic context effects on the N400 in the letter-search task in the absence of response time effects. Psychological Science, 15, 852–857.
Hutchison, K. A., & Bosco, F. A. (2007). Congruency effects in the letter search task: Semantic activation in the absence of priming. Memory & Cognition, 35, 514–525.
Kahan, T. A., Sellinger, J. J., & Broman-Fulks, J. J. (2006). Associative and phonological priming effects after letter search on the prime. American Journal of Psychology, 119, 239–254.
Kučera, H., & Francis, W. N. (1967). Computational analysis of present-day American English. Providence, RI: Brown University Press.
Landauer, T. K., & Dumais, S. T. (1997). A solution to Plato’s problem: The latent semantic analysis theory of acquisition, induction, and representation of knowledge. Psychological Review, 104, 211–240.
Marí-Beffa, P., Valdés, B., Cullen, D. J. D., Catena, A., & Houghton, G. (2005). ERP analyses of task effects on semantic processing from words. Cognitive Brain Research, 23, 293–305.
Marslen-Wilson, W. [D.], Tyler, L. K., Waksler, R., & Older, L. (1994). Morphology and meaning in the English mental lexicon. Psychological Review, 101, 3–33.
McNamara, T. P. (2005). Semantic priming: Perspectives from memory and word recognition. New York: Psychology Press.
Neely, J. H. (1977). Semantic priming and retrieval from lexical memory: Roles of inhibitionless spreading activation and limited-capacity attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 106, 226–254.
Neely, J. H., & Kahan, T. A. (2001). Is semantic activation automatic? A critical re-evaluation. In H. L. Roediger III, J. S. Nairne, I. Neath, & A. M. Surprenant (Eds.), The nature of remembering: Essays in honor of Robert G. Crowder (pp. 69–93). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Neely, J. H., & Keefe, D. E. (1989). Semantic context effects on visual word processing: A hybrid prospective-retrospective processing theory. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (Vol. 24, pp. 207–248). New York: Academic Press.
Neely, J. H., Keefe, D. E., & Ross, K. L. (1989). Semantic priming in the lexical decision task: Roles of prospective prime-generated expectancies and retrospective semantic matching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 15, 1003–1019.
Nelson, D. L., McEvoy, C. L., & Schreiber, T. A. (2004). The University of South Florida free association, rhyme, and word fragment norms. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36, 402–407.
Pastizzo, M. J. (2003). Multiple dimensions of relatedness among words: Do effects of form and meaning interact? Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University at Albany, State University of New York.
Raaijmakers, J. G. W., Schrijnemakers, J. M. C., & Gremmen, F. (1999). How to deal with “the language-as-fixed-effect fallacy”: Common misconceptions and alternative solutions. Journal of Memory & Language, 41, 416–426.
Rastle, K., Davis, M. H., Marslen-Wilson, W. D., & Tyler, L. K. (2000). Morphological and semantic effects in visual word recognition: A time-course study. Language & Cognitive Processes, 15, 507–537.
Stolz, J. A., & Besner, D. (1998). Levels of representation in visual word recognition: A dissociation between morphological and semantic processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 24, 1642–1655.
Stolz, J. A., & Besner, D. (1999). On the myth of automatic semantic activation in reading. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 8, 61–65.
Tse, C.-S., & Neely, J. H. (2007). Semantic priming from letter-searched primes occurs for low- but not high-frequency targets: Automatic semantic access may not be a myth. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 33, 1143–1161.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pastizzo, M.J., Neely, J.H. & Tse, CS. With a letter-searched prime, boat primes float but swim and coat don’t: Further evidence for automatic semantic activation. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 15, 845–849 (2008). https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.15.4.845
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.15.4.845