Abstract
Everyday tasks often require us to keep track of multiple objects in dynamic scenes. Past studies show that tracking becomes more difficult as objects move faster. In the present study, we show that this trade-off may not be due to increased speed itself but may, instead, be due to the increased crowding that usually accompanies increases in speed. Here, we isolate changes in speed from variations in crowding, by projecting a tracking display either onto a small area at the center of a hemispheric projection dome or onto the entire dome. Use of the larger display increased retinal image size and object speed by a factor of 4 but did not increase interobject crowding. Results showed that tracking accuracy was equally good in the large-display condition, even when the objects traveled far into the visual periphery. Accuracy was also not reduced when we tested object speeds that limited performance in the small-display condition. These results, along with a reinterpretation of past studies, suggest that we might be able to track multiple moving objects as fast as we can a single moving object, once the effect of object crowding is eliminated.
Article PDF
References
Alvarez, G. A., & Cavanagh, P. (2005). Independent resources for attentional tracking in the left and right visual hemifields. Psychological Science, 16, 637–643.
Alvarez, G. A., & Franconeri, S. L. (2007). How many objects can you track? Evidence for a resource-limited attentive tracking mechanism. Journal of Vision, 7(13): 14, 1–10.
Carlson, T. A., Alvarez, G. A., & Cavanagh, P. C. (2007). Quadrantic deficit reveals anatomical constraints on selection. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104, 13496–13500.
Cavanagh, P., & Alvarez, G. A. (2005). Tracking multiple targets with multifocal attention. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 349–354.
Franconeri, S. L., Alvarez, G. A., & Enns, J. T. (2007). How many locations can you select? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 33, 1003–1012.
Hopf, J.-M., Boehler, C. N., Luck, S. J., Tsotsos, J. K., Heinze, H.-J., & Schoenfeld, A. M. (2006). Direct neurophysiological evidence for spatial suppression surrounding the focus of attention in vision. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 103, 1053–1058.
Intriligator, J., & Cavanagh, P. (2001). The spatial resolution of visual attention. Cognitive Psychology, 43, 171–216.
Liu, G., Austen, E. L., Booth, K. S., Fisher, B. D., Argue, R., Rempel, M. I., & Enns, J. T. (2005). Multiple-object tracking is based on scene, not retinal, coordinates. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 31, 235–247.
McKee, S. P., & Smallman, H. S. (1998). Size and speed constancy. In V. Walsh & J. J. Kulikowski (Eds.), Perceptual constancies: Why things look as they do (pp. 373–408). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Pelli, D. G., Palomares, M., & Majaj, N. J. (2004). Crowding is unlike ordinary masking: Distinguishing feature integration from detection. Journal of Vision, 4, 1136–1169.
Pylyshyn, Z. W. (2004). Some puzzling findings in multiple object tracking: I. Tracking without keeping track of object identities. Visual Cognition, 11, 801–822.
Pylyshyn, Z. W., & Storm, R. W. (1988). Tracking multiple independent targets: Evidence for a parallel tracking mechanism. Spatial Vision, 3, 179–197.
Scholl, B. J. (2001). Objects and attention: The state of the art. Cognition, 80, 1–46.
Sereno, A. B., & Kosslyn, S. M. (1991). Discrimination within and between hemifields: A new constraint on theories of attention. Neuropsychologia, 29, 659–675.
Shim, W. M., Alvarez, G. A., & Jiang, Y. V. (2008). Spatial separation between targets constrains maintenance of attention on multiple objects. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15, 390–397.
Toet, A., & Levi, D. M. (1992). The two-dimensional shape of spatial interaction zones in the parafovea. Vision Research, 32, 1349–1357.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
S.L.F. was supported by an Isaac Walter Killam Postdoctoral Fellowship. J.T.E. was supported by a Discovery Grant from NSERC (Canada).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Franconeri, S.L., Lin, J.Y., Enns, J.T. et al. Evidence against a speed limit in multiple-object tracking. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 15, 802–808 (2008). https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.15.4.802
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.15.4.802