Abstract
Much work has been done to investigate participants’ ability to detect repeated targets, but the present study examined the influence of recently attended stimuli on target masking. Participants performed a target identification task in which the item that masked the target was either a recently attended item or a novel item. When it was identical to a previously attended stimulus, the mask was rendered considerably less effective. We have termed this effect a repeated mask reduction (RMR). This simple manipulation resulted in a large, reliable effect on the efficacy of visual masking in a single-target identification paradigm. In Experiments 1, 2, and 3, we demonstrated the basic effect and noted that the RMR increased as task difficulty increased. Experiments 4 and 5 suggested that attention to the first instance of the mask was crucial to this effect by showing that the magnitude of the RMR was unaffected by repetition of nonmask distractors and that the magnitude of the effect was reduced when less attention was paid to the first instance of the mask.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anderson, C. J., & Neill, W. T. (2002). Two Bs or not two Bs? A signal detection theory analysis of repetition blindness in a counting task. Perception & Psychophysics, 64, 732–740.
Breitmeyer, B. G., & Ganz, L. (1976). Implications for sustained and transient channels for theories of visual pattern masking, saccadic suppression and information processing. Psychological Review, 81, 1–36.
Breitmeyer, B. G., & Ogmen, H. (2000). Recent models and findings in visual backward masking: A comparison, review, and update. Perception & Psychophysics, 62, 1572–1595.
Chun, M. M., & Potter, M. C. (1995). A two-stage model for multiple target detection in rapid serial visual presentation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 21, 109–127.
Dehaene, S., Naccache, L., Le Clec, H. G., Koechlin, E., Mueller, M., Dehaene-Lambertz, G., et al. (1998). Imaging unconscious semantic priming. Nature, 395, 597–600.
Di Lollo, V., Enns, J. T., & Rensink, R. A. (2000). Competition for consciousness among visual events: The psychophysics of reentrant visual processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129, 481–507.
Drew, T., & Shapiro, K. (2006). Conceptual masking in the attentional blink. Visual Cognition, 13, 513–528.
Dux, P. E., Coltheart, V., & Harris, I. M. (2006). On the fate of distractor stimuli in rapid serial visual presentation. Cognition, 99, 355–382.
Enns, J., & Di Lollo, V. (1997). Object-substitution: A new form of masking in unattended visual locations. Psychological Science, 8, 135–139.
Enns, J., & Di Lollo, V. (2000). What’s new in visual masking? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 345–352.
Fagot, C., & Pashler, H. (1995). Repetition blindness: Perception or memory failure? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 21, 275–292.
Forster, K. I., & Davis, C. (1984). Repetition priming and frequency attenuation in lexical access. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Leaning, Memory, & Cognition, 10, 680–698.
Henson, R. N. A. (2003). Neuroimaging studies of priming. Progress in Neurobiology, 70, 53–81.
Johnston, J. C., Hochhaus, L., & Ruthruff, E. (2002). Repetition blindness has a perceptual locus: Evidence from online processing of targets in RSVP streams. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 28, 477–489.
Kanwisher, N. G. (1987). Repetition blindness: Type recognition without token individuation. Cognition, 27, 117–143.
Kanwisher, N. G., & Potter, M. C. (1990). Repetition blindness: Levels of processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 16, 30–47.
Kurylo, D. D. (1997). Time course of perceptual grouping. Perception & Psychophysics, 59, 142–147.
Marcel, A. J. (1983). Conscious and unconscious perception: Experiments on visual masking and word recognition. Cognitive Psychology, 19, 197–237.
Miller, E. K., & Desimone, R. (1994). Parallel neuronal mechanisms for short-term memory. Science, 263, 520–523.
Moore, C. M., & Lleras, A. (2005). On the role of representations in substitution masking. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 31, 1171–1180.
Philips, W. A., & Singer, W. (1974). Function and interaction of ON and OFF transients in vision 1. Psychophysics. Experimental Brain Research, 19, 493–506.
Raymond, J., Shapiro, K., & Arnell, K. (1992). Temporary suppression of visual processing in an RSVP task: An attentional blink? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 18, 849–860.
Raymond, J., Shapiro, K., & Arnell, K. (1995). Similarity determines the attentional blink. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 21, 653–662.
Schacter, D. L., & Buckner, R. L. (1998). Priming and the brain. Neuron, 20, 185–195.
Shiu, L., & Pashler, H. (1994). Negligible effect of spatial precuing on identification of single digits. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 20, 1037–1054.
Theeuwes, J. (1991). Exogenous and endogenous control of attention: The effect of visual onsets and offsets. Perception & Psychophysics, 49, 83–90.
Vogel, E. K., Woodman, G. F., & Luck, S. J. (2006). The time course of consolidation in visual working memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 32, 1436–1451.
Whittlesea, B. W. A., & Wai, K. H. (1997). Reverse “repetition blindness” and release from “repetition blindness”: Constructive variations on the “repetition blindness” effect. Psychological Research, 60, 173–182.
Yantis, S., & Jonides, J. (1984). Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: Evidence from visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 10, 601–621.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This study was supported by grants from the National Science Foundation and the Oregon Medical Research Foundation.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Drew, T.W., Vogel, E.K. Recently attended masks are less effective. Perception & Psychophysics 70, 96–103 (2008). https://doi.org/10.3758/PP.70.1.96
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/PP.70.1.96