Abstract
The dynamics of correct and error responses in a variant of delayed free recall were examined in the present study. In the externalized free recall paradigm, participants were presented with lists of words and were instructed to subsequently recall not only the words that they could remember from the most recently presented list, but also any other words that came to mind during the recall period. Externalized free recall is useful for elucidating both sampling and postretrieval editing processes, thereby yielding more accurate estimates of the total number of error responses, which are typically sampled and subsequently edited during free recall. The results indicated that the participants generally sampled correct items early in the recall period and then transitioned to sampling more erroneous responses. Furthermore, the participants generally terminated their search after sampling too many errors. An examination of editing processes suggested that the participants were quite good at identifying errors, but this varied systematically on the basis of a number of factors. The results from the present study are framed in terms of generate-edit models of free recall.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anderson, J. R., &Bower, G. H. (1972). Recognition and retrieval processes in free recall.Psychological Reviewv,79, 97–123.
Bousfield, W. A., &Rosner, S. R. (1970). Free vs. uninhibited recall.Psychonomic Science,20, 75–76.
Craik, F. I. M. (1968). Types of error in free recall.Psychonomic Science,10, 353–354.
Davelaar, E. J., Goshen-Gottstein, Y., Ashkenazi, A., Haarmann, H. J., &Usher, M. (2005). The demise of short-term memory revisited: Empirical and computational investigations of recency effects.Psychological Review,112, 3–42.
Deese, J. (1959). On the prediction of occurrence of particular verbal intrusions in immediate recall.Journal of Experimental Psychology,58, 17–22.
Friendly, M., Franklin, P. E., Hoffman, D., &Rubin, D. C. (1982). The Toronto Word Pool: Norms for imagery, concreteness, orthographic variables, and grammatical usage for 1,080 words.Behavior Research Methods & Instrumentation,14, 375–399.
Gardiner, J. M., &Klee, H. (1976). Memory for remembered events: An assessment of output monitoring in free recall.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,15, 227–233.
Glanzer, M., &Cunitz, A. R. (1966). Two storage mechanisms in free recall.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,5, 351–360.
Harbison, J. I., Dougherty, M. R., Davelaar, E. J., &Fayyad, B. (2009). On the lawfulness of the decision to terminate memory search.Cognition,111, 416–421.
Howard, M. W., &Kahana, M. J. (2002a). A distributed representation of temporal context.Journal of Mathematical Psychology,46, 269–299.
Howard, M. W., &Kahana, M. J. (2002b). When does semantic similarity help episodic retrieval?Journal of Memory & Language,46, 85–98.
Johnson, M. K., Hashtroudi, S., &Lindsay, D. S. (1993). Source monitoring.Psychological Bulletin,114, 3–28.
Kahana, M. J. (1996). Associative retrieval processes in free recall.Memory & Cognition,24, 103–109.
Kahana, M. J., Dolan, E. D., Sauder, C. L., &Wingfield, A. (2005). Intrusions in episodic recall: Age differences in editing of overt responses.Journals of Gerontology,60B, P92-P97.
Kahana, M. J., Miller, J. F., & Weidemann, C. T. (2009).Recall termination in free recall. Manuscript submitted for publication.
Keppel, G., &Mallory, W. A. (1969). Presentation rate and instructions to guess in free recall.Journal of Experimental Psychology,79, 269–275.
Kimball, D. R., Smith, T. A., &Kahana, M. J. (2007). The fSAM model of false recall.Psychological Review,114, 954–993.
Kintsch, W. (1970).Learning, memory, and conceptual processes. New York: Wiley.
Kintsch, W. (1978). More on recognition failure of recallable words: Implications for generation-recognition models.Psychological Review,85, 470–473.
Laming, D. (2009). Failure to recall.Psychological Review,116, 157–186.
Mensink, G.-J., &Raaijmakers, J. G. W. (1988). A model for interference and forgetting.Psychological Review,95, 434–455.
Metcalfe, J., &Murdock, B. B. (1981). An encoding and retrieval model of single-trial free recall.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,20, 161–189.
Murdock, B. B. (1974).Human memory: Theory and data. Potomac, MD: Erlbaum.
Nairne, J. S. (2006). Modeling distinctiveness: Implications for general memory theory. In R. R. Hunt & J. B. Worthen (Eds.),Distinctiveness and memory (pp. 27–46). New York: Oxford University Press.
Raaijmakers, J. G. W., &Shiffrin, R. M. (1980). SAM: A theory of probabilistic search of associative memory. In G. H. Bower (Ed.),The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 14, pp. 207–262). New York: Academic Press.
Roediger, H. L., III, &McDermott, K. B. (1995). Creating false memories: Remembering words not presented in lists.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,21, 803–814.
Roediger, H. L., III, &Payne, D. G. (1985). Recall criterion does not affect recall level or hypermnesia: A puzzle for generate/recognize theories.Memory & Cognition,13, 1–7.
Rohrer, D., &Wixted, J. T. (1994). An analysis of latency and interresponse time in free recall.Memory & Cognition,22, 511–524.
Rosen, V. M., &Engle, R. W. (1997). The role of working memory capacity in retrieval.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,126, 211–227.
Sederberg, P. B., Howard, M. W., &Kahana, M. J. (2008). A contextbased theory of recency and contiguity in free recall.Psychological Review,115, 893–912.
Sirotin, Y. B., Kimball, D. R., &Kahana, M. J. (2005). Going beyond a single list: Modeling the effects of prior experience on episodic free recall.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,12, 787–805.
Tan, L., &Ward, G. (2000). A recency-based account of the primacy effect in free recall.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,26, 1589–1625.
Tulving, E., &Thomson, D. M. (1973). Encoding specificity and retrieval processes in episodic memory.Psychological Review,80, 352–373.
Tulving, E., &Wiseman, S. (1975). Relation between recognition and recognition failure of recallable words.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society,6, 79–82.
Unsworth, N. (2007). Individual differences in working memory capacity and episodic retrieval: Examining the dynamics of delayed and continuous distractor free recall.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,33, 1020–1034.
Unsworth, N. (2008). Exploring the retrieval dynamics of delayed and final free recall: Further evidence for temporal-contextual search.Journal of Memory & Language,59, 223–236.
Unsworth, N., & Brewer, G. A. (in press). Variation in working memory capacity and intrusions: Differences in generation or editing?European Journal of Cognitive Psychology.
Unsworth, N., &Engle, R. W. (2007). The nature of individual differences in working memory capacity: Active maintenance in primary memory and controlled search from secondary memory.Psychological Review,114, 104–132.
Watkins, M. J. (1979). Engrams as cuegrams and forgetting as cue overload: A cueing approach to the structure of memory. In C. R. Puff (Ed.),Memory organization and structure (pp. 347–372). New York: Academic Press.
Watkins, M. J., &Gardiner, J. M. (1979). An appreciation of generate-recognize theory of recall.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,18, 687–704.
Zaromb, F. M., Howard, M. W., Dolan, E. D., Sirotin, Y. B., Tully, M., Wingfield, A., &Kahana, M. J. (2006). Temporal associations and prior-list intrusions in free recall.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,32, 792–804.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Unsworth, N., Brewer, G.A. & Spillers, G.J. Understanding the dynamics of correct and error responses in free recall: Evidence from externalized free recall. Memory & Cognition 38, 419–430 (2010). https://doi.org/10.3758/MC.38.4.419
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/MC.38.4.419