Abstract
When people recall a list of items that they have just experienced (an episodic memory task), the resulting serial position function looks strikingly similar to that observed when people are asked to recall the presidents of the United States (a semantic memory task). Despite the similarity in appearance, there is disagreement about whether the two functions arise from the same processes. A local distinctiveness model of memory, SIMPLE, successfully fit the presidential data using two underlying dimensions: one corresponding to item (or presidential) distinctiveness and the other to order (or positional) distinctiveness. According to the model, presidential primacy and recency are due to the same mechanisms that give rise to primacy and recency effects in both shortand long-term episodic memory. All of these primacy and recency effects reflect the relative distinctiveness principle (Surprenant & Neath, 2009): Items will be well remembered to the extent that they are more distinct than competing items at the time of retrieval.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baddeley, A. D. (1976). The psychology of memory. New York: Basic Books.
Bhatarah, P., Ward, G., Smith, J., & Hayes, L. (2009). Examining the relationship between free recall and immediate serial recall: Similar pat terns of rehearsal and similar effects of word length, presentation rate, and articulatory suppression. Memory & Cognition, 37, 689–713.
Bjork, R. A., & Whitten, W. B. (1974). Recency-sensitive retrieval processes in long-term free recall. Cognitive Psychology, 6, 173–189.
Brown, G. D. A., Chater, N., & Neath, I. (2008). Serial and free recall: Common effects and common mechanisms? A reply to Murdock (2008). Psychological Review, 115, 781–785.
Brown, G. D. A., Neath, I., & Chater, N. (2007). A temporal ratio model of memory. Psychological Review, 114, 539–576.
Brown, N. R. (1990). Organization of public events in long-term memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 119, 297–314.
Brown, N. R., & Siegler, R. S. (1991). Subjective organization of U.S. presidents. American Journal of Psychology, 104, 1–33.
Crowder, R. G. (1976). Principles of learning and memory. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Crowder, R. G. (1993). Short-term memory: Where do we stand? Memory & Cognition, 21, 142–145.
Glanzer, M. (1972). Storage mechanisms in recall. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 5, pp. 129-153). New York: Academic Press.
Glanzer, M., & Cunitz, A. R. (1966). Two storage mechanisms in free recall. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 5, 351–360.
Glenberg, A. M., Bradley, M. M., Kraus, T. A., & Renzaglia, G. J. (1983). Studies of the long-term recency effect: Support for a contextually guided retrieval hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 9, 231–255.
Healy, A. F., Havas, D. A., & Parker, J. T. (2000). Comparing serial position effects in semantic and episodic memory using reconstruction of order tasks. Journal of Memory & Language, 42, 147–167.
Healy, A. F., & Parker, J. T. (2001). Serial position effects in semantic memory: Reconstructing the order of U. S. presidents and vice presidents. In H. L. Roediger III, J. S. Nairne, I. Neath, & A. M. Surprenant (Eds.), The nature of remembering: Essays in honor of Robert G. Crowder (pp. 171–188). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Lewandowsky, S., & Brown, G. D. A. (2005). Serial recall and presentation schedule: A micro-analysis of local distinctiveness. Memory, 13, 283–292.
Lewandowsky, S., Brown, G. D. A., Wright, T., & Nimmo, L. M. (2006). Timeless memory: Evidence against temporal distinctiveness models of short-term memory for serial order. Journal of Memory & Language, 54, 20–38.
Murdock, B. B., Jr. (1960). The distinctiveness of stimuli. Psychological Review, 67, 16–31.
Neath, I., & Brown, G. D. A. (2006). SIMPLE: Further applications of a local distinctiveness model of memory. In B. H. Ross (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 46, pp. 201–243). San Diego: Academic Press.
Neath, I., & Brown, G. D. A. (2007). Making distinctiveness models of memory distinct. In J. S. Nairne (Ed.), The foundations of remembering: Essays in honor of Henry L. Roediger III (pp. 125–140). New York: Psychology Press.
Neath, I., Brown, G. D. A., McCormack, T., Chater, N., & Freeman, R. (2006). Distinctiveness models of memory and absolute identification: Evidence for local, not global, effects. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59, 121–135.
Neath, I., & Crowder, R. G. (1996). Distinctiveness and very shortterm serial position effects. Memory, 4, 225–242.
Postman, L., & Phillips, L. W. (1965). Short-term temporal changes in free recall. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 17, 132–138.
Roediger, H. L., III (2008). Relativity of remembering: Why the laws of memory vanished. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 225–254.
Roediger, H. L., III, & Crowder, R. G. (1976). A serial position effect in recall of United States presidents. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 8, 275–278.
Shepard, R. N. (1987). Toward a universal law of generalization for psychological science. Science, 237, 1317–1323.
Surprenant, A. M., & Neath, I. (2009). Principles of memory. New York: Psychology Press.
Surprenant, A. M., Neath, I., & Brown, G. D. A. (2006). Modeling age-related differences in immediate memory using SIMPLE. Journal of Memory & Language, 55, 572–586.
Tan, L., & Ward, G. (2000). A recency-based account of the primacy effect in free recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 26, 1589–1625.
Tulving, E. (1985). How many memory systems are there? American Psychologist, 40, 385–398.
Tulving, E. (2002). Episodic memory: From mind to brain. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 1–25.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This work was supported, in part, by a grant from NSERC. I thank A. F. Healy, H. L. Roediger III, and A. M. Surprenant for comments on an earlier version.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Neath, I. Evidence for similar principles in episodic and semantic memory: The presidential serial position function. Memory & Cognition 38, 659–666 (2010). https://doi.org/10.3758/MC.38.5.659
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/MC.38.5.659