Abstract
Two event-related potential (ERP) experiments were used to examine the representation of object feature information and background knowledge in semantic memory. Participants were trained on novel object categories with three features and were tested with new exemplars that were complete or were missing one to two features that were essential or nonessential to object function. In both a category membership judgment task (Experiment 1) and a parts detection task (Experiment 2), the N400, a functionally specific measure of semantic access, was graded with feature number but was insensitive to knowledge-based feature importance. A separable ERP effect related to knowledge was seen in Experiment 1 as an enhanced frontocentral negativity (beginning ∼300 msec) to exemplars missing a nonessential versus an essential feature, but this effect did not manifest when background knowledge was less task relevant (Experiment 2). Thus, similarity- and knowledge-based effects are separable, and the locus of knowledge effects varies with task demands but does not seem to arise from facilitated semantic access.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Azizian, A., Freitas, A. L., Parvaz, M. A., & Squires, N. K. (2006). Beware misleading cues: Perceptual similarity modulates the N2/P3 complex. Psychophysiology, 43, 253–260.
Daffner, K. R., Mesulam, M. M., Scinto, L. F., Calvo, V., Faust, R., & Holcomb, P. J. (2000). An electrophysiological index of stimulus unfamiliarity. Psychophysiology, 37, 737–747.
Dale, A. M. (1994). Source localization and spatial discriminate analysis of event-related potentials: Linear approaches. University of California, San Diego, Department of Cognitive Science.
Folstein, J. R., & Van Petten, C. (2004). Multidimensional rule, unidimensional rule, and similarity strategies in categorization: Eventrelated potential correlates. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 30, 1026–1044.
Folstein, J. R., & Van Petten, C. (2008). Influence of cognitive control and mismatch on the N2 component of the ERP: A review. Psychophysiology, 45, 152–170.
Folstein, J. R., Van Petten, C., & Rose, S. A. (2008). Novelty and conflict in the categorization of complex stimuli. Psychophysiology, 45, 467–479.
Ganis, G., & Kutas, M. (2003). An electrophysiological study of scene effects on object identification. Cognitive Brain Research, 16, 123–144.
Ganis, G., Kutas, M., & Sereno, M. I. (1996). The search for “common sense: An electrophysiological study of the comprehension of words and pictures in reading. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 8, 89–106.
Goldstone, R. L. (1994). Influences of categorization on perceptual discrimination. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 123, 178–200.
Goldstone, R. L., Lippa, Y., & Shiffrin, R. M. (2001). Altering object representations through category learning. Cognition, 78, 27–43.
Heinze, H.-J., Münte, T.-F., & Kutas, M. (1998). Context effects in a category verification task as assessed by event-related brain potential (ERP) measures. Biological Psychology, 47, 121–135.
Johnson, K. E., & Mervis, C. B. (1997). Effects of varying levels of expertise on the basic level of categorization. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 126, 248–277.
Kutas, M., & Federmeier, K. D. (2000). Electrophysiology reveals semantic memory use in language comprehension. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 463–470.
Kutas, M., Federmeier, K. D., Staab, J., & Kluender, R. (2007). Language. In J. T. Cacioppo, L. Tassinary, & G. Berntson (Eds.), Handbook of psychophysiology (3rd ed., pp. 555–580). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kutas, M., & Hillyard, S. A. (1980a). Event-related brain potentials to semantically inappropriate and surprisingly large words. Biological Psychology, 11, 99–116.
Kutas, M., & Hillyard, S. A. (1980b). Reading senseless sentences: Brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity. Science, 207, 203–205.
Kutas, M., & Hillyard, S. A. (1983). Event-related brain potentials to grammatical errors and semantic anomalies. Memory & Cognition, 11, 539–550.
Lin, E. L., & Murphy, G. L. (1997). Effects of background knowledge on object categorization and part detection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 23, 1153–1169.
Luck, S. J., & Hillyard, S. A. (1994). Electrophysiological correlates of feature analysis during visual search. Psychophysiology, 31, 291–308.
Luhmann, C. C., Ahn, W.-K., & Palmeri, T. J. (2006). Theory-based categorization under speeded conditions. Memory & Cognition, 34, 1102–1111.
McLaughlin, J., Osterhout, L., & Kim, A. (2004). Neural correlates of second-language word learning: Minimal instruction produces rapid change. Nature Neuroscience, 7, 703–704.
Medin, D. L. (1989). Concepts and conceptual structure. American Psychologist, 44, 1469–1481.
Murphy, G. L. (2002). The big book of concepts. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Murphy, G. L., & Medin, D. L. (1985). The roles of theories in conceptual coherence. Psychological Review, 92, 289–316.
Nieuwenhuis, S., Yeung, N., van den Wildenberg, W., & Ridderinkhof, K. R. (2003). Electrophysiological correlates of anterior cingulate function in a go/no-go task: Effects of response conflict and trial type frequency. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 3, 17–26.
Nobre, A. C., & McCarthy, G. (1995). Language-related field potentials in the anterior medial temporal lobe: Modulation by word-type and semantic priming. Journal of Neuroscience, 15, 1090–1098.
Nosofsky, R. M. (1986). Attention, similarity, and the identification-categorization relationship. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 115, 39–61.
Olichney, J. M., Van Petten, C., Paller, K. A., Salmon, D. P., Iragui, V. J., & Kutas, M. (2000). Word repetition in amnesia: Electrophysiological measures of impaired and spared memory. Brain, 123, 1948–1963.
Palmeri, T. J., & Blalock, C. (2000). The role of background knowledge in speeded perceptual categorization. Cognition, 77, B45-B57.
Pfefferbaum, A., Ford, J. M., Weller, B. J., & Kopell, B. S. (1985). ERPs to response production and inhibition. Electroencephalography & Clinical Neurophysiology, 60, 423–434.
Rosch, E., & Mervis, C. B. (1975). Family resemblances: Studies in the internal structure of categories. Cognitive Psychology, 7, 573–605.
Schendan, H. E., & Kutas, M. (2002). Neurophysiological evidence for two processing times for visual object identification. Neuropsychologia, 40, 931–945.
Schendan, H. E., & Kutas, M. (2003). Time course of processes and representations supporting visual object identification and memory. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 15, 111–135.
Schendan, H. E., & Kutas, M. (2007). Neuropsychological evidence for the time course of activation of global shape, part, and local contour representations during visual object categorization and memory. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19, 734–749.
Sitnikova, T., Kuperberg, G., & Holcomb, P. J. (2003). Semantic integration of videos in real-world events: An electrophysiological investigation. Psychophysiology, 40, 160–164.
Swaab, T. Y., Brown, C., & Hagoort, P. (1998). Understanding ambiguous words in sentence contexts: Electrophysiological evidence for delayed contextual selection in Broca’s aphasia. Neuropsychologia, 36, 737–761.
Tanaka, J. W., & Curran, T. (2001). A neural basis for expert object recognition. Psychological Science, 12, 43–47.
Tse, C. Y., Lee, C. L., Sullivan, J., Garnsey, S. M., Dell, G. S., Fabiani, M., & Gratton, G. (2007). Imaging cortical dynamics of language processing with the event-related optical signal. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104, 17157–17162.
West, W. C., & Holcomb, P. J. (2002). Event-related potentials during discourse-level semantic integration of complex pictures. Cognitive Brain Research, 13, 363–375.
Wisniewski, E. J. (1995). Prior knowledge and functionally relevant features in concept learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 21, 449–468.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This research was supported by NIA Grant AG26308 to K.D.F. We thank the members of the Cognition and Brain Lab, especially the undergraduate assistants who helped with this project: Anastasia Kidd, Sarah Baisley, Jessica Atkins, and Michael Hawn.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gratton, C., Evans, K.M. & Federmeier, K.D. See what I mean? An ERP study of the effect of background knowledge on novel object processing. Memory & Cognition 37, 277–291 (2009). https://doi.org/10.3758/MC.37.3.277
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/MC.37.3.277