Abstract
Can people “see” previously unnoticed properties in objects that they visualize, or are they locked into the organization of the pattern that was encoded during perception? To answer this question, we first asked a group to describe letters of the alphabet and found that some properties (such as the presence of a diagonal line) are often mentioned, whereas others (such as symmetry) are rarely if ever mentioned. Then we showed not only that other participants could correctly detect both kinds of properties in visualized letters, but also that the relative differences in the ease of detecting these two types of properties are highly similar in perception (when the letters are actually visible) and imagery (when the letters are merely visualized). These findings provide support for the view that images can be reinterpreted in ways much like what occurs during perception and speak to the wider issue of the long-standing debate about the format of mental images.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anderson, J. R., & Bower, G. H. (1973). Human associative memory. Washington, DC: Winston.
Chambers, D., & Reisberg, D. (1992). What an image depicts depends on what an image means. Cognitive Psychology, 24, 145–174.
Finke, R. A. (1990). Creative imagery: Discoveries and inventions in visualization. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Kimchi, R. (1992). Primacy of wholistic processing and global/local paradigm: A critical review. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 24–38.
Kosslyn, S. M. (1975). Information representation in visual images. Cognitive Psychology, 7, 341–370.
Kosslyn, S. M. (1980). Image and mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Kosslyn, S. M. (1994). Image and brain: The resolution of the imagery debate. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Kosslyn, S. M., Ganis, G., & Thompson, W. L. (2003). Mental imagery: Against the nihilistic hypothesis. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 109–111.
Kosslyn, S. M., & Pomerantz, J. R. (1977). Imagery, propositions, and the form of internal representations. Cognitive Psychology, 9, 52–76.
Kosslyn, S. M., & Thompson, W. L. (2003). When is early visual cortex activated during visual mental imagery? Psychological Bulletin, 129, 723–746.
Kosslyn, S. M., Thompson, W. L., & Ganis, G. (2002). Mental imagery doesn’t work like that. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 25, 198–200.
Kosslyn, S. M., Thompson, W. L., & Ganis, G. (2006). The case for mental imagery. New York: Oxford University Press.
Marr, D. (1982). Vision. San Francisco: Freeman.
Mast, F. W., & Kosslyn, S. M. (2002). Visual mental images can be ambiguous: Insights from individual differences in spatial transformation abilities. Cognition, 86, 57–70.
Peterson, M. A., Kihlstrom, J. F., Rose, P. M., & Glisky, M. L. (1992). Mental images can be ambiguous: Reconstruals and reference-frame reversals. Memory & Cognition, 20, 107–123.
Pylyshyn, Z. W. (1973). What the mind’s eye tells the mind’s brain: A critique of mental imagery. Psychological Bulletin, 80, 1–24.
Pylyshyn, Z. W. (1981). The imagery debate: Analogue media versus tacit knowledge. Psychological Review, 88, 16–45.
Pylyshyn, Z. W. (2002). Mental imagery: In search of a theory. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 25, 157–238.
Pylyshyn, Z. W. (2003). Seeing and visualizing: It’s not what you think. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Reisberg, D. (1997). Constraints on image-based discovery: A comment on Rouw et al. (1997). Cognition, 66, 95–102.
Reisberg, D., & Chambers, D. (1991). Neither pictures nor propositions: What can we learn from a mental image? Canadian Journal of Psychology, 45, 336–352.
Rouw, R., Kosslyn, S. M., & Hamel, R. (1997). Detecting high-level and low-level properties in visual images and visual percepts. Cognition, 63, 209–226.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This research was supported by Grant 2 R01 MH060734-05A1 from the National Institute of Mental Health. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Institute of Mental Health.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Thompson, W.L., Kosslyn, S.M., Hoffman, M.S. et al. Inspecting visual mental images: Can people “see” implicit properties as easily in imagery and perception?. Memory & Cognition 36, 1024–1032 (2008). https://doi.org/10.3758/MC.36.5.1024
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/MC.36.5.1024