Abstract
The relationship between print exposure and measures of reading skill was examined in college students (N = 99, 58 female; mean age = 20.3 years). Print exposure was measured with several new self-reports of reading and writing habits, as well as updated versions of the Author Recognition Test and the Magazine Recognition Test (Stanovich & West, 1989). Participants completed a sentence comprehension task with syntactically complex sentences, and reading times and comprehension accuracy were measured. An additional measure of reading skill was provided by participants’ scores on the verbal portions of the ACT, a standardized achievement test. Higher levels of print exposure were associated with higher sentence processing abilities and superior verbal ACT performance. The relative merits of different print exposure assessments are discussed.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allen, L., Cipielewski, J., & Stanovich, K. E. (1992). Multiple indicators of children’s reading habits and attitudes: Construct validity and cognitive correlates. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 489–503.
Anderson, R. C., Wilson, P. T., & Fielding, L. G. (1988). Growth in reading and how children spend their time outside of school. Reading Research Quarterly, 23, 285–303.
Ang, C. H., & Noble, J. P. (1993). Incremental validity of ACT assessment scores and high school course information for freshman course placement. ACT Research Report Series, 93–95. Available at www.act.org/research/reports/index.html.
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.
Beech, J. R. (2002). Individual differences in mature readers in reading, spelling, and grapheme—phoneme conversion. Current Psychology: Developmental, Learning, Personality, Social, 21, 121–132.
Biber, D. (1986). Spoken and written textual dimensions in English: Resolving the contradictory findings. Language, 62, 384–414.
Cattell, R. B. (1966). The scree test for the number of factors. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1, 245–276.
Chateau, D., & Jared, D. (2000). Exposure to print and word recognition process. Memory & Cognition, 28, 143–153.
Cipielewski, J., & Stanovich, K. E. (1992). Predicting growth in reading ability from children’s exposure to print Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 54, 74–89.
Cohen, S. (1971). Effects of task, interval and order of presentation on time estimation. Perceptual & Motor Skills, 33, 101–102.
Cunningham, A. E., & Stanovich, K. E. (1990). Assessing print exposure and orthographic processing skill in children: A quick measure of reading experience. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 733–740.
Cunningham, A. E., & Stanovich, K. E. (1991). Assessing print exposure and orthographic processing in children: Associations with vocabulary, general knowledge and spelling. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 423–441.
Daneman, M., & Carpenter, P. A. (1980). Individual differences in working memory and reading. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behaviour, 19, 450–466.
Ennis, P. H. (1965). Adult book reading in the United States (National Opinion Research Center Report No. 105). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Fritters, J. C., Barron, R. W., & Brunello, M. (2000). Direct and mediated influences of home literacy and literacy interest on prereaders’ oral vocabulary and early written language skill. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 466–477.
Greaney, V. (1980). Factors related to amount and type of leisure time reading. Reading Research Quarterly, 15, 337–357.
Guay, M. (1982). Long-term retention of temporal information. Perceptual & Motor Skills, 54, 843–849.
Guthrie, J. T. (1981). Reading in New Zealand: Achievement and volume. Reading Research Quarterly, 17, 6–27.
Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1992). A capacity theory of comprehension: Individual differences in working memory. Psychological Review, 98, 122–149.
Just, M. A., Carpenter, P. A., & Woolley, J. D. (1982). Paradigms and processes in reading comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 111, 228–238.
Kennedy, A., & Murray, W. S. (1984). Inspection times for words in syntactically ambiguous sentences under three presentation conditions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 10, 833–849.
King, J., & Just, M. A. (1991). Individual differences in syntactic processing: The role of working memory. Journal of Memory & Language, 30, 580–602.
Lewis, R., Ieale, W. (1980). Another look at secondary school students’ attitudes toward reading. Journal of Reading Behavior, 12, 189–201.
MacDonald, M. C., & Christiansen, M. H. (2002). Reassessing working memory: A comment on Just & Carpenter (1992) and Waters & Caplan (1996). Psychological Review, 109, 35–54.
McBride-Chang, C., Manis, F. R., Seidenberg, M. S., Custodio, R. G., & Dca, L. M. (1993). Print exposure as a predictor of word reading and reading comprehension in disabled and nondisabled readers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 230–238.
Mitchell, D. (1994). Sentence parsing. In M. A. Gernsbacher (Ed.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 375–409). New York: Academic Press.
Noble, J. (1988). Estimating reading skill from ACT achievement scores (ACT Research Report 88). Available at www.act.org/research/reports/ index.html.
Noble, J. (1991). Predicting college grades from ACT assessment scores and high school coursework and grade information (ACT Research Report 91-3). Available at www.act.org/research/reports/ index.html.
Pearlmutter, N. J., & MacDonald, M. C. (1995). Individual differences and probabilistic constraints in syntactic ambiguity resolution. Journal of Memory & Language, 34, 521–542.
Scribner, S., & Cole, M. (1981). The psychology of literacy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Sharon, A. T. (1973–1974). What do adults read? Reading Research Quarterly, 9, 148–169.
Simon, H. A., & Newell, A. (1974). Thinking processes. In D. H. Krantz & R. C. Atkinson (Eds.), Contemporary developments in mathematical psychology: I. Learning, memory and thinking (pp. 101–144). Oxford: Freeman.
Stanovich, K. E., & Cunningham, A. E. (1992). Studying the consequences of literacy within a literate society: The cognitive correlates of print exposure. Memory & Cognition, 20, 51–68.
Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (1989). Exposure to print and orthographic processing. Reading Research Quarterly, 24, 402–433.
Stanovich, K. E., West, R. F., & Harrison, M. R. (1995). Knowledge growth and maintenance across the life span: The role of print exposure. Developmental Psychology, 31, 811–826.
Stiggins, R. J., Schmeiser, C. B., & Ferguson, R. L. (1978). Validity of the ACT assessment as an indicator of reading ability. Applied Psychological Measurement, 2, 337–344.
Stringer, R., & Stanovich, K. E. (2000). The connection between reaction time and variation in reading ability: Unraveling covariance relationships with cognitive ability and phonological sensitivity. Scientific Studies of Reading, 4, 41–53.
Waters, G. S., & Caplan, D. (1996). The measurement of verbal working memory capacity and its relation to reading comprehension. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 49A, 51–79.
West, R. F., Stanovich, K. E., & Mitchell, H. R. (1993). Reading in the real world and its correlates. Reading Research Quarterly, 28, 35–50.
Zill, N., & Winglee, M. (1990). Whoreads literature? The future of the United States as a nation of readers. Cabin John, MD: Seven Locks Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This research was supported by NIMH Grant P50 MH644445, NICHD Grant R01 HD047425, and the Wisconsin Alumni Research Fund.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Acheson, D.J., Wells, J.B. & MacDonald, M.C. New and updated tests of print exposure and reading abilities in college students. Behav Res 40, 278–289 (2008). https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.40.1.278
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.40.1.278