Abstract
Thirty-six subjects recalled sentences containing dichotomous or continuous antonyms in affirmative or negative form. The subjects made a considerable number of meaning-preserving recall errors for both dichotomous antonyms (not alive recalled asdead) and continuous antonyms (not hot recalled ascold). The negation of a dichotomous antonym logically implies its antonym, whereas the negation of a continuous antonym only pragmatically implies its antonym. Thus, the results suggest that subjects hearing sentences containing a logical or pragmatic implication tend to make the logical or pragmatic inference involved. Then, in recall, they do not remember that this was an inference and make the error of recalling the logical or pragmatic implication in place of the presented sentence.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bock, J. K., & Brewer. W. F. Reconstructive recall m sentences with alternative surface structures. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1974, 103, 837–843.
Bransford, J. D., Barclay, J. R., & Franks, J. J. Sentence memory: A constructive versus interpretive approach. Cognitive Psychology, 1972, 3, 193–209.
Brewer, W. F. The problem of meaning and the interrelations of the higher mental processes. In W. B. Weimer and D. S. Palermo (Eds.),Cognition and the symbolic processes. Potomac, Md: Erlbaum, in press.
Clark, H. H. The language-as-fixed-effect fallacy: A critique of language statistics in psychological research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior. 1973, 12, 335–359.
Fillenbaum, S. Memory for gist: Some relevant variables. Language and Speech, 1966, 9, 21–227.
Harris, R. J. Memory and comprehension of imphcations and references of complex sentences. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1974, 13, 626–637.
Johnson, M. K., Bransford, J. D., & Solomon, S. K. Memory for tacit implications of sentences. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1973, 98, 203–205.
Kiparsky, P., & Kiparsky, C. Fact. In M. Bierwisch and K. E. Heidolph (Eds.),Progress in linguistics. The Hague: Mouton, 1970.
Lakoff, R. If’s, and’s, and but’s about conjunction. In C. J. Fillmore and D. T. Langendoen (Eds.),Studies in linguistic semantics. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1971.
Lyons, J.Introduction to theoretical linguistics. London: Cambridge University Press, 1968.
Sachs, J. S. Recognition memory for syntactic and semantic aspects of connected discourse. Perception & Psychophysics, 1967, 2, 437–442.
Webster’s dictionary of synonyms. Springfield, Mass: Merriam, 1951.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Brewer, W.F., Lichtenstein, E.H. Recall of logical and pragmatic implications in sentences with dichotomous and continuous antonyms. Memory & Cognition 3, 315–318 (1975). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03212917
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03212917