Abstract
Classically, it has been assumed that visual space can be represented by a metric. This means that the distance between points and the angle between lines can be uniquely defined. However, this assumption has never been tested. Also, measurements outdoors, where monocular cues are abundant, conflict with this model. This paper reports on two experiments in which the structure of visual space was investigated, using an exocentric pointing task. In the first experiment, we measured the influence of the separation between pointer and target and of the orientation of the stimuli with respect to the observer. This was done both monocularly and binocularly. It was found that the deviation of the pointer settings depended linearly on the orientation, indicating that visual space is anisotropic. The deviations for configurations that were symmetrical in the median plane were approximately the same, indicating that left/right symmetry was maintained. The results for monocular and binocular conditions were very different, which indicates that stereopsis was an important cue. In both conditions, there were large deviations from the veridical. In the second experiment, the relative distance of the pointer and the target with respect to the observer was varied in both the monocular and the binocular conditions. The relative distance turned out to be the main parameter for the ranges used (1–5 m). Any distance function must have an expanding and a compressing part in order to describe the data. In the binocular case, the results were much more consistent than in the monocular case and had a smaller standard deviation. Nevertheless, the systematic mispointings remained large. It can therefore be concluded that stereopsis improves space perception but does not improve veridicality.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Battro, A. M., Di Pierro Netto, S., &Rozestraten, J. A. (1976). Riemannian geometries of variable curvature in visual space: Visual alleys, horopters, and triangles in big open fields.Perception,5, 9–23.
Battro, A. M., Reggini, H. C., &Karts, C. (1978). Perspectives in open spaces: A geometrical application of the Thouless index.Perception,7, 583–588.
Blank, A. A. (1958). Analysis of experiments in binocular space perception.Journal of the Optical Society of America,48, 911–925.
Blank, A. A. (1961). Curvature of binocular visual space: An experiment.Journal of the Optical Society of America,51, 335–339.
Blank, A. A. (1978). Metric geometry in human binocular perception: Theory and fact. In E. L. J. Leeuwenberg & H. F. J. M. Buffart (Eds.),Formal theories of visual perception (pp. 83–102). New York: Wiley.
Blumenfeld, W. (1913). Untersuchungen über die scheinbare Grösse in Sehräume [Studies on apparent sizes in visual space].Zeitschrift für Psychologie,65, 241–404.
Collewijn, H., &Erkelens, C. J. (1990). Binocular eye movements and the perception of depth. In E. Kowler (Ed.),Eye movements and their role in visual and cognitive processes (pp. 213–261). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Ellis, S. R., Smith, S., Grunwald, A., &McGreevy, M. W. (1991). Direction judgment error in computer generated displays and actual scenes. In S. R. Ellis (Ed.),Pictorial communication in virtual and real environments (Pt. IV, Chap. 34, pp. 504–526). London: Taylor & Francis.
Eschenburg, J. C. (1980). Is binocular visual space constantly curved?Journal of Mathematical Biology,9, 3–22.
Foley, J. M. (1963). Desarguesian property in visual space.Journal of the Optical Society of America,54, 684–692.
Foley, J. M. (1965). Locus of perceived equidistance as a function of viewing distance.Journal of the Optical Society of America,56, 822–827.
Foley, J. M. (1972). The size-distance relation and intrinsic geometry of visual space: Implications for processing.Vision Research,12, 323–332.
Foley, J. M. (1977). Effect of distance information and range on two indices of visually perceived distance.Perception,6, 449–460.
Foley, J. M. (1980). Binocular distance perception.Psychological Review,87, 411–434.
Foley, J. M. (1991). Binocular space perception. In D. Regan (Ed.),Vision and visual dysfunction: Binocular vision (Vol. 9, Chap. 4, pp. 75–92). London: Macmillan.
Gilinsky, A. S. (1951). Perceived size and distance in visual space.Psychological Review,58, 460–482.
Hardy, L. H., Rand, G., &Rittler, M. C. (1951). Investigation of visual space: The Blumenfeld alleys.Archives of Ophthalmologv,45, 53–63.
Heller, J. (1997a). On the psychophysics of binocular space perception.Journal of Mathematical Psychology,41, 29–43.
Heller, J. (1997b). Psychophysische Invarianzen des beidäugigen Raumsehens [Psychophysical invariances in binocular space perception].Zeitschrift für Psychologie,205, 297–318.
Higashiyama, A. (1981). Variation of curvature in binocular visual space estimated by the triangle method.Vision Research,21, 925–933.
Higashiyama, A. (1984). Curvature of binocular visual space: A modified method of right triangle.Vision Research,24, 1713–1718.
Hillebrand, F. (1902). Theorie der scheinbaren Grösse bei binocularem Sehen [Theory of apparent sizes in binocular vision].Denkschriften der Wiener Akademie, Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaft Klasse,72, 255–307.
Indow, T. (1991). A critical review of Luneburg’s model with regard to global structure of visual space.Psychological Review,98, 430–453.
Indow, T. (1997). Hyperbolic representation of global structure of visual space.Journal of Mathematical Psychology,41, 89–98.
Indow, T., Inoue, E., &Matsushima, K. (1962a). An experimental study of the Luneburg theory of binocular space perception: I. The 3- and 4-point experiments.Japanese Psychological Research,4, 6–16.
Indow, T., Inoue, E., &Matsushima, K. (1962b). An experimental study of the Luneburg theory of binocular space perception: 2. The alley experiments.Japanese Psychological Research,4, 17–24.
Indow, T., &Watanabe, T. (1984). Parallel-alleys and distance-alleys on horopter plane in the dark.Perception,13, 165–182.
Koenderink, J. J., &Van Doorn, A. J. (1998). Exocentric pointing. In L. R. Harris & M. Jenkin (Eds.),Vision and action (pp. 295–313). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lukas, J. (1983). Visuelle Frontalparallelen: Ein Entscheidungsexperiment zu den Theorien von Blank, Foley und Luneburg [Visual frontoparallel horopters: A decision experiment between the theories of Blank, Foley, and Luneburg].Zeitschrift für Experimentelle und Angewandte Psychologie,4, 610–627.
Luneburg, R. K. (1947).Mathematical analysis of binocular vision. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Stoker, J. J. (1969).Differential geometry. New York: Wiley.
Wagner, M. (1985). The metric of visual space.Perception, & Psychophysics,38, 483–495.
Zajaczkowska, A. (1956a). Experimental determination of Luneburg’s constants σ andK.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,8, 66–78.
Zajaczkowska, A. (1956b). Experimental test of Luneburg’s theory: Horopter and alley experiments.Journal of the Optical Society of America,46, 514–527.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
An erratum to this article is available at http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03194477.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cuijpers, R.H., Kappers, A.M.L. & Koenderink, J.J. Investigation of visual space using an exocentric pointing task. Perception & Psychophysics 62, 1556–1571 (2000). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03212156
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03212156