Abstract
Three experiments explored how participants solved a very open-ended generative problem-solving task. Previous research has shown that when participants are shown examples, novel creations will tend to conform to features shared across those examples (Smith, Ward, & Schumacher, 1993). We made the shared features of the examples conceptually related to one another. We found that when the features were related to the concept of hostility, participants’ creations contained hostile features that were not part of any of the examples. These results suggest that participants will design novel entities to be consistent with emergent properties of examples shown to them. We also found that a mild hostility prime from unscrambling sentences had a similar conceptual effect. Together, the two effects suggest that conceptual priming of generative cognitive tasks will influence the cognitive aspects of the creative process.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bargh, J., &Pietromonoaco, P. (1982). Automatic information processing and social perception: The influence of trait information presented outside of conscious awareness on impression formation.Journal of Personality & Social Psychology,43, 437–449.
Barsalou, L. W. (1985). Ideals, central tendency, and frequency of instantiation as determinants of graded structure in categories.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,11, 629–654.
Bower, G. H. (1986). Prime time in cognitive psychology. In P. Eelen (Ed.),Behavior therapy: Beyond the conditioning paradigm (pp. 22–47). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Bower, G. H. (1996). Reactivating a reactivation theory of implicit memory.Consciousness & Cognition,5, 27–72.
Bredart, S., Ward, T. B., &Marczewski, P. (1998). Structured imagination of novel creatures’ faces.American Journal of Psychology,111, 607–625.
Brown, A. S., &Murphy, D. R. (1989). Cryptomnesia: Delineating inadvertent plagiarism.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,15, 432–442.
Finke, R. A., Ward, T. B., &Smith, S. M. (1992).Creative cognition: Theory, research, and applications. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Gagne, C., &Shoben, E. J. (1997). The influence of thematic relations on the comprehension of nonpredicating combinations.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,23, 71–87.
Hampton, J. A. (1997). Emergent attributes in combined concepts. In T. B. Ward, S. M. Smith, & J. Vaid (Eds.),Creative thought: An investigation of conceptual structures and processes (pp. 83–110). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Heit, E. (1992). Categorization using chains of examples.Cognitive Psychology,24, 341–380.
Higgins, E. T., Rholes, W. S., &Jones, C. R. (1977). Category accessibility and impression formation.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology,13, 141–154.
Jacoby, L. L., &Whitehouse, K. (1989). An illusion of memory: False recognition influenced by unconscious perception.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,118, 126–135.
Jansson, D. G., &Smith, S. M. (1991). Design fixation.Design Studies,12, 3–11.
Marsh, R. L., &Bower, G. H. (1993). Eliciting cryptomnesia: Unconscious plagiarism in a puzzle task.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,19, 673–688.
Marsh, R. L., Landau, J. D., &Hicks, J. L. (1996). How examples may (and may not) constrain creativity.Memory & Cognition,24, 669–680.
Marsh, R. L., Landau, J. D., &Hicks, J. L. (1997). The contribution of inadequate source monitoring to unconscious plagiarism during idea generation.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,23, 886–897.
Perkins, D. N. (1981).The mind’s best work. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Perkins, D. N. (1988). Creativity and the quest for a mechanism. In R. J. Sternberg & E. E. Smith (Eds.),The psychology of human thought (pp. 310–336). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Shoben, E. J., &Gagne, C. (1997). Thematic relations and the creation of combined concepts. In T. B. Ward, S. M. Smith, & J. Vaid (Eds.),Creative thought: An investigation of conceptual structures and processes (pp. 31–50). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Smith, S. M., Ward, T. B., &Schumacher, J. S. (1993). Constraining effects of examples in a creative generation task.Memory & Cognition,21, 837–845.
Srull, T. K., &Wyer, R. S. (1979). The role of category accessibility in the interpretation of information about persons: Some determinants and implications.Journal of Personality & Social Psychology,37, 1660–1672.
Srull, T. K., &Wyer, R. S. (1980). Category accessibility and social perception: Some implications for the study of person memory and interpersonal judgments.Journal of Personality & Social Psychology,38, 841–856.
Ward, T. B. (1994). Structured imagination: The role of category structure in exemplar generation.Cognitive Psychology,27, 1–40.
Ward, T. B., &Sifonis, C. (1997). Task demands and generative thinking: What changes and what remains the same?Journal of Creative Behavior,31, 245–259.
Watson, R. E., Pritzker, L., &Madison, P. (1955). Hostility in neurotics and normals.Journal of Abnormal & Social Psychology,50, 36–41.
Whittlesea, B. W. A., Jacoby, L. L., &Girard, K. (1990). Illusions of immediate memory: Evidence of an attributional bias for feelings of familiarity and perceptual quality.Journal of Memory & Language,29, 716–732.
Wyer, R. S., &Srull, T. K. (1986). Human cognition in its social context.Psychological Review,93, 322–359.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This work was supported by a Sigma Xi grant-in-aid.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Marsh, R.L., Bink, M.L. & Hicks, J.L. Conceptual priming in a generative problem-solving task. Memory & Cognition 27, 355–363 (1999). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03211419
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03211419