Abstract
The relative efficiency of five techniques of illusion measurement were tested on parametric variations of the Mueller-Lyer and Ebbinghaus figures. The methods of average error, reproduction, and selection from a graded series all showed significant effects of configurational variations. The subjective scaling techniques each failed to measure adequately changes in illusion magnitude for one illusion configuration. The suitability of the tested measures for group administration is also discussed.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
BOLLES, R. C. The role of eye movements in the Müller-Lyer illusion. Perception & Psychophysics, 1969, 6, 175–176.
BURNHAM, C. A. Decrement of the Müller-Lyer illusion with saccadic and tracking eye movements. Perception & Psychophysics, 1968, 3, 424–426.
COREN, S. The influence of optical aberrations on the magnitude of the Poggendorff illusion. Perception & Psychophysics, 1969, 6,185–186.
COREN, S. Lateral inhibition and the Wundt-Hering illusion. Psychonomic Science, 1970a, 18, 341.
COREN, S. Lateral inhibition and geometrie illusions. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1970b, 22, 274–278.
COREN, S., & GIRGUS, J. S. Illusion decrement in intersecting line figures. Psychonomic Science, 1972, 26, 108–110.
DEWAR, R. E. Stimulus determinants of the magnitude of the Müller-Lyer illusion. Perceptual & Motor Skills, 1967, 24, 708–710.
ERLEBACHER, A., & SEKULER, R. Explanation of the Müller-Lyer illusion: Confusion theory examined. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1969, 80, 462–467.
EYMAN, R. K. The effect of sophistication on ratio and discriminative scales. American Journal of Psychology, 1967, 80, 520–540.
FESTINGER, L., WHITE, C. W., & ALLYN,M. R. Eye movements and decrement in the Müller-Lyer illusion. Perception & Psychophysics, 1968, 3, 376–382.
GIRGUS, J. S., COREN, S., & AGDERN, M. The interrelationship between the Ebbinghaus and Delboeuf illusions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1972, in press.
HAYS, W. L. Statistici. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1963.
JUDD, C. H. A study of geometrical illusions. Psychological Review, 1899, 6, 241–261.
JUDD, C. H. Practice and its effects on the perception of illusions. Psychological Review, 1902, 9, 27–39.
JUDD, C. H. The Müller-Lyer illusion. Psychological Review, Monograph Supplement, 1905, 7, (Whole No. 29), 55–81.
LEWIS, E. O. The effect of practice on the perception of the Müller-Lyer illusion. British Journal of Psychology, 1908, 2, 294–306.
LEWIS, E. O. Confluxion and contrast effects in the Müller-Lyer illusion. British Journal of Psychology, 1909, 3, 21–41.
MASSARO, D. W., & ANDERSON, N. H. Judgmental model of the Ebbinghaus illusion. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1971, 89, 147–151.
MOSES, F. L., & DESISTO, M. J. Arm-movement respons es to Müller-Lyer stimuli. Perception & Psychophysics, 1970, 8, 376–378.
PRESSEY, A. W., & SWEENEY, O. A variation of the Poggendorff illusion. Perceptual & Motor Skills, 1969, 28, 883–886.
RESTLE, F., & MERRYMAN, C. T. An adaptation-level theory account of a relative-size illusion. Psychonomic Science, 1968, 12, 229–230.
SEASHORE, C. E., CARTER, E. A., FARNUM, E. C, & SIES, R. W. The effect of practice on normal illusions. Psychological Review, Monograph Supplement, 1908, 9, 103–148.
SEASHORE, C. E., & WILLIAMS, M. C. An illusion of length. Psychological Review, 1900, 7, 592–599.
SEASHORE, C. E., & WILLIAMS, M. C. An illusion of length. University of Iowa Studies in Psychology, 1902, 3, 29–37.
VIRSU, V. Geometrie illusions, I. Effects of figure type, instruction, and pre- and intertrial training on magnitude and decrement of illusion. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 1967, 8, 161–171.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Coren, S., Girgus, J.S. A comparison of five methods of illusion measurement. Behav. Res. Meth. & Instru. 4, 240–244 (1972). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03210006
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03210006