Skip to main content
Log in

Monocular without stereopsis with and head movement

  • Published:
Perception & Psychophysics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Random dots moving with various velocity gradients were presented to observers; the motion was yoked to head movement in one condition and to no head movement in another. In Experiment 1, 12 observers were shown motion gradients with sine, triangle, sawtooth, and square waveforms with amplitudes (equivalent disparities) of 12′ and 1° 53′. In Experiment 2, 48 observers were shown only the sinewave or square-wave gradient of 1° 53′ disparity either with or without head movement so that the observers’ expectation to see depth in one condition did not transfer to another. The main findings were: (1) with 12′ disparity, the head-movement condition produced perceived depth but almost no perceived motion, whereas the no-head-movement condition produced both perceived depth and perceived motion; (2) with 1° 53′ disparity, both conditions produced perceived depth and perceived motion; and (3) when the expectation to see depth was removed, the no-head-movement condition with the square-wave gradient produced no perceived depth, only motion. We suggest that monocular stereopsis with head movement can be achieved without perception of motion but monocular stereopsis without head movement requires perception of motion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Braunstein, M. L. (1968). Motion and texture as sources of slant information.Journal of Experimental Psychology,78, 247–253.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Braunstein, M. L. (1976).Depth perception through motion. New York: Acadenuc Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braunstein, M. L., &Andersen, G. J. (1981). Velocity gradients and relative depth perception.Percepnon & Psychophysics,29, 145–155.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Braunstein, M. L., &Tittle, J. S. (1988). The observer-relative velocity field as the basis for effective motion parallax.Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception & Performance,14, 582–590.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cutting, J. E. (1986).Perception with an eye for motion. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farber, J. M., &McConkie, A. B. (1979). Optical motions as Information for unsigned depth.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,5, 494–500.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Flock, H. R. (1964). Some conditions sufficient for accurate monocular perceptions of moving surface slants.Journal of Experimental Psychology,67, 560–572

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, E. J., Gibson, J. J., Smith, O. W., &Flock, H. (1959). Motion parallax as a determinant of perceived depth.Journal of Experimental Psychology,58, 40–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, J. J. (1950).The perception of the visual world. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, C. H. (1951). Visual perception In S. S. Stevens (Ed.),Handbook of experimental psychology (pp. 868–920). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heine, L (1905). On perception and conception of distance differences.Albrecht yon Graefes Archiv für Klinische und Expertmentelle Opthamologie,61, 484–498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ittelson, W. H. (1960).Visual space perception New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman, L. (1974).Sight and mind: An introduction to visual percepnon. New York. Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Koenderink, J. J. (1985). Space, form and optical deformations. In D. J. Ingle, M. Jeannerod, & D N. Lee (Eds),Brain mechanisms and spatial vision (pp 31–58). Dordrecht Martinus Nijhoff.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, D. N (1974) Visual information about locomotion. In R. B MacLeod & H. L Pick, Jr (Eds.),Perception. Essays in honor of James J Gibson (pp. 250–267) Ithaca, NY Cornell University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Mack, A. (1986) Perceptual aspects of motion in the frontal plane. In R. K. Boff, L. Kaufman, & J. P. Thomas (Eds),Handbook of perception and human performance (pp 17–1-17-38) New York Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mather, G (1989). Early motion processes and the kinetic depth effect.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,41A, 183–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ono, H., Rogers, B. J., Ohmi M., &Ono, M. E. (1988). Dynamic occlusion and motion parallax in depth perceptionPerception,17, 255–266.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ono, M. E., Rivest, J., &Ono, H (1986) Depth perception as a function of motion parallax and absolute-distance information.Journal of Experimental Psychology,12, 331–337.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Regan, D. M. (In press) Depth from motion and motion In depth. In D. Regan (Ed.),Vision and visual dysfunction. Vol. 10A. Binocular vision. London: Macmillan.

  • Rogers, B. J., &Collett, T. S. (1989) The appearance of surfaces specified by motion parallax and binocular dispanty.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,41, 697–717

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, B J., &Graham, M. (1979). Motion parallax as an independent cue for depth perception.Perception,9, 125–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, B., &Graham, M. (1982). SimdanUes between motion parallax and stereopsis in human depth perception.Vision Research,22. 261–270.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, B. J., &Koenderink, J. (1986) Monocular aniseikonia A motion parallax analogue of the disparity-induced effectNature,322, 62–63.

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, B. J., Ono, H., &Rogers, S (1988). The role of visual and non-visual information in disambiguating motion parallax transformations.Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science,29(Suppl 3), 265

    Google Scholar 

  • Saida, S., & Ono, H. (1989).What extent of motion parallax produces depth perception? Abstract submitted for presentation

  • Sedgwick, H A. (1986). Space perception. In R. K. Boff, L. Kaufman, & J P. Thomas (Eds.),Handbook of perception and human performance (pp. 21–1-21-57). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinbach, M. J., Ono, H., & Wolf, M. E. (In press). Motion parallax judgements of depth as a function of the direction and type of head movement.Canadian Journal of Psychology.

  • Swanston, M. T., &Wade, N. J. (1987). The perception of visual motion during movements of the eyes and of the headPerception & Psychophysics,43, 559–566

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swanston, M. T., Wade, N. J., &Day, R D (1987). The representation of uniform motion in vision.Perception,16, 143–159.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wallach, H. (1985). Perceiving a stable environmentScientific Amencan,252, 118–124.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This research was supported by Grants A0296 and A7664 from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, and by Grant EY05960 from the Nauonal Insututes of Health.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ono, H., Steinbach, M.J. Monocular without stereopsis with and head movement. Perception & Psychophysics 48, 179–187 (1990). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03207085

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03207085

Keywords

Navigation