Abstract
The effects of stimulus duration and spatial separation on the illusion of apparent motion in the auditory modality were examined. Two narrow-band noise sources (40 dB, A-weighted) were presented through speakers separated in space by 2.5°, 5°, or 100, centered about the subject’s midline. The duration of each stimulus was 5, 10, or 50 msec. On each trial, the sound pair was temporally separated by 1 of 10 interstimulus onset intervals (ISOIs): 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 15, 20, 50, or 70 msec. Five subjects were tested in nine trial blocks; each block represented a particular spatial-separation-duration combination. Within a trial block, each ISOI was presented 30 times each, in random order. Subjects were instructed to listen to the stimulus sequence and classify their perception of the sound into one of five categories: single sound, simultaneous sounds, continuous motion, broken motion, or successive sounds. Each subject was also required to identify the location of the first-occurring stimulus (left or right). The percentage of continuous-motion responses was significantly affected by the ISOI [F(9,36) = 5.67,p < .001], the duration × ISOI interaction [F(18,72) = 3.54,p < .0001], and the separation × duration × ISOI interaction [F(36,144) = 1.51,p < .05]. The results indicate that a minimum duration is required for the perception of auditory apparent motion. Little or no motion was reported at durations of 10 msec or less. At a duration of 50 msec, motion was reported most often for ISOIs of 20–50 msec. The effect of separation appeared to be limited to durations and-ISOIs during which little motion was perceived.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anstis, S. M. (1978). Apparent movement. In R. Held, W. Leibowitz, & H. Teuber (Eds.),Handbook of sensory physiology: Vol. 8. Perception (pp. 655–673). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
Baker, C. L., &Braddick, O. J. (1985). Temporal properties of the short-range process in apparent motion.Perception,14, 181–192.
Blugos, R., &Perrott, D. R. (1972). Auditory apparent movement under dichotic listening conditions.Journal of Experimental Psychology,92, 83–91.
Grantham, D. W. (1986). Detection and discrimination of simulated motion of auditory targets in the horizontal plane.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,79, 1939–1949.
Kolers, P. A. (1972).Aspects of motion perception. Oxford: Pergamon.
Korte, A. (1915). Kinematoskopisehe Untersuchungen.Zeitschrift für Psychologie,72, 193–206.
Neuhaus, W. (1930). Experimentelle Untersuchungen der Scheinbewegung.Pflugers Archivfar die Gesamte Psychologie des Menschen und der flere,75, 415–458.
Perrott, D. R. (1974). Auditory apparent motion.Journal of Auditory Research,14, 163–169.
Strybel, T. Z., Manligas, C. L., Chan, O., &Perrott, D. R. (1990). A comparison of the effects of spatial separation on apparent motion in the auditory and visual modalities.Perception & Psycholophysics,47, 439–448.
Strybel, T. Z., Manligas.C. L., &Perrott, D. R. (1989). Auditory apparent motion under binaural and monaural listening conditions.Perception & Psychophysics,45, 371–377.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Strybel, T.Z., Witty, A.M. & Perrott, D.R. Auditory apparent motion in the free field: The effects of stimulus duration and separation. Perception & Psychophysics 52, 139–143 (1992). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206766
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206766