Abstract
Members of the Iowa Academy of Family Physicians participated in a survey study in which they were asked to make hypothetical decisions in either high- or low-conflict treatment conditions. In the low-conflict treatment condition the options were a common medication with a referral or a referral only. In the high-conflict treatment condition the same two options were given plus another attractive medication. In addition, we manipulated accountability by asking half of the participants to provide a written defense of their treatment options, which they would then agree to discuss at a later time. The results showed that physicians in the high-conflict condition chose the referral-only option significantly more than the physicians in the low-conflict condition, thus violating the normative rule of regularity. Moreover, that pattern was significantly amplified for physicians who were held accountable for their treatment decisions. These findings replicate and extend previous research and are discussed within the framework of reason-based choice.
Article PDF
References
Goldstein, W. M., &Einhorn, H. J. (1987). Expression theory and the preference reversal phenomena.Psychological Review,94, 236–254.
Huber, J., Payne, J. W., &Puto, C. (1982). Adding asymmetrically dominated alternatives: Violations of regularity and the similarity hypothesis.Journal of Consumer Research,9, 90–98.
Lerner, J. S., &Tetlock, P. E. (1999). Accounting for the effects of accountability.Psychological Bulletin,125, 255–275.
Redelmeier, D. A., &Shafir, E. (1995). Medical decision making in situations that offer multiple alternatives.Journal of the American Medical Association,273, 302–305.
Schwartz, J. A., &Chapman, G. B. (1999). Are more options always better? The attraction effect in physicians’ decisions about medications.Medical Decision Making,19, 315–323.
Shafir, E., Simonson, I., &Tversky, A. (1993). Reason-based choice.Cognition,49, 11–36.
Simonson, I. (1989). Choice based on reasons: The case of attraction and compromise effects.Journal of Consumer Research,16, 158–174.
Simonson, I., &Nye, P. (1992). The effect of accountability on susceptibility to decision errors.Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes,51, 416–446.
Slovic, P. (1995). The construction of preference.American Psychologist,50, 364–371.
Tversky, A., &Shafir, E. (1992) Choice under conflict: The dynamics of deferred decision.Psychological Science,3, 358–361.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This research was supported by NSF Grant SES-99-75083 awarded to the second author.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Schwartz, J., Chapman, G., Brewer, N. et al. The effects of accountability on bias in physician decision making: Going from bad to worse. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 11, 173–178 (2004). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206479
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206479