Abstract
According to Kornblum’s (1992) dimensional overlap model, when an incongruent response to a stimulus is required, automatic activation of the congruent response must first be inhibited. Shiu and Kornblum (1996a) provided evidence for such inhibition in an incongruent symbolicnegative priming task. Reaction time was longer when a trial’s correct response was the name of the stimulus from the previous trial than when it was not. We report three experiments that test this inhibition hypothesis for spatial stimuli and responses. In Experiment 1, which used a spatial mapping analogous to the symbolic mapping used by Shiu and Kornblum (1996a), a similar negative priming effect was found. However, in Experiments 2 and 3, which used mappings that were conducive to simple transformational rules, a positive priming effect was obtained. The results suggest that inhibition in response selection may depend on the complexity of the relations between the stimuli and responses.
Article PDF
References
De Jong, R. (1995). Strategical determinants of compatibility effects with task uncertainty.Acta Psychologica,88, 187–207.
Duncan, J. (1977). Response selection errors in spatial choice reaction tasks.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,29, 415–423.
Ehrenstein, A., &Proctor, R. W. (1998). Selecting mapping rules and responses in mixed compatibility four-choice tasks.Psychological Research,61, 231–248.
Hommel, B. (2000). The prepared reflex: Automaticity and control in stimulus-response translation. In S. Monsell & J. Driver (Eds.),Control of cognitive processes: Attention and performance XVIII (pp. 247–273). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Kornblum, S. (1992). Dimensional overlap and dimensional relevance in stimulus-response and stimulus-stimulus compatibility. In G. E. Stelmach & J. Requin (Eds.),Tutorials in motor behavior II (pp. 743–777). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Logan, G. D. (1980). Attention and automaticity in Stroop and priming tasks: Theory and data.Cognitive Psychology,12, 523–553.
Neill, W. T. (1979). Switching attention within and between categories: Evidence for intracategory inhibition.Memory & Cognition,7, 283–290.
Neill, W. T., &Mathis, K. M. (1998). Transfer-inappropriate processing: Negative priming and related phenomena. In D. L. Medin (Ed.),The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (Vol. 38, pp. 1–44). San Diego: Academic Press.
Neill, W. T., Valdes, L. A., &Terry, K. M. (1995). Selective attention and the inhibitory control of cognition. In F. Dempster & C. Brainerd (Eds.),Interference and inhibition in cognition (pp. 207–261). New York: Academic Press.
Neill, W. T., &Westberry, R. L. (1987). Selective attention and the suppression of cognitive noise.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,13, 327–334.
Proctor, R. W., &Reeve, T. G. (1990). Research on stimulus-response compatibility: Toward a comprehensive account. In R.W. Proctor & T. G. Reeve (Eds.),Stimulus-response compatibility: An integrated perspective (pp. 483–494). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Proctor, R. W., &Vu, K.-P. L. (2002). Eliminating, magnifying, and reversing spatial compatibility effects with mixed location-relevant and irrelevant trials. In W. Prinz & B. Hommel (Eds.),Common mechanisms in perception and action: Attention and performance XIX (pp. 443–473). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Shiu, L.-P., &Kornblum, S. (1996a). Negative priming and stimulus-response compatibility.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,3, 510–514.
Shiu, L.-P., &Kornblum, S. (1996b). Negative priming without distractors.Abstracts of the Psychonomic Society 37th Annual Meeting,1, 63.
Stoffels, E. J. (1996). On stage robustness and response selection routes: Further evidence.Acta Psychologica,91, 67–88.
Tagliabue, M., Martignago, N., &Simion, F. (1996). La codifica della dimensione spaziale dello stimolo in età evolutiva: Compatibilità spaziale ed effetto Simon.Giornale Italiano dí Psicologia,23, 645–673.
Tipper, S. P. (1985). The negative priming effect: Inhibitory priming by ignored objects.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,37A, 571–590.
Tipper, S. P., &Milliken, B. (1996). Distinguishing between inhibitionbased and episodic retrieval-based accounts of negative priming. In A. F. Kramer, M. G. H. Coles, & G. D. Logan (Eds.),Converging operations in the study of visual attention (pp. 337–363). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Tipper, S., Weaver, B., &Houghton, G. (1994). Behavioral goals determine inhibitory mechanisms of selective attention.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,47A, 809–840.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Read, L.E., Proctor, R.W. Spatial stimulus-response compatibility and negative priming. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 11, 41–48 (2004). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206458
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206458