Abstract
A stepwise change in the frequency of a continuous pure tone is taken as an element signal. The detectability of a single step is compared with the detectability of a pattern composed of two such steps in order to determine the ways in which the steps interact and how these interactions depend upon the time interval between the steps. It is shown that two positive steps separated by D msec interact by summation (d’ for two steps being greater than d’ for a single step) and that this summation is 100% even when D=100 msec. The extent of summation decreases as D is increased beyond 100 msec, leveling off at about 40% when D is near 1,000 msec. A positive step followed by a negative step (an increment) presents a more complex picture. When D=0 msec, the pattern is the null signal, and, of course, the two steps subtract completely. As D is increased, the extent of subtraction decreases, becoming zero when D is about 400 msec. Increasing D beyond 400 msec results in summation, reaching about 40% when D=2,000 msec. For D less than about 1,000 msec, the sign of the second step in a two-step signal is important: two steps of like sign summate, and two steps of unlike sign subtract. However, when the two steps are separated by about 2,000 msec, the sign of the second step is irrelevant: summation occurs, and the extent, about 40%, is the same for two steps of like sign and two steps of unlike sign. A brief theoretical discussion stresses the extant need for an information-processing theory of signal detection.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Garner, W. R., &Miller, G. A. Differential sensitivity to intensity as a function of the duration of the comparison tone.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1944,34,450–463.
Green, D. M., &Swets, J. A.Signal detection theory and psychophysics. New York: Wiley, 1966.
Henning, G. B. A comparison of the effects of signal duration on frequency and amplitude discrimination. In R. Plomp & G. F. Smoorenburg (Eds.),Frequency analysis and periodicity detection in hearing. Leiden, The Netherlands: Sijthoff, 1970.
Jesteadt, W., &Bilger, R, C. Intensity and frequency discrimination in one- and two-interval paradigms.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1974,55, 1266–1276.
Kinchla, R. A. Temporal and channel uncertainty in detection: A multiple observation analysis.Perception & Psychophysics, 1969,5, 129–136.
Kristofferson, A. B. Low-variance stimulus-response latencies: Deterministic internal delays?Perception & Psychophysics, 1976,20, 89–100.
Macmillan, N. A. Detection and recognition of increments and decrements in auditory intensity.Perception & Psychophysics, 1971,10, 233–238.
Macmillan, N. A. Detection and recognition of intensity changes in tone and noise: The detection-recognition disparity.Perception & Psychophysics, 1973,13, 65–75.
Stevens, S. S. A neural quantum in sensory discrimination.Science, 1972,177, 749–762.
Stevens, S. S., Morgan, C T., &Volkman, J. Theory of the neural quantum in the discrimination of loudness and pitch.American Journal of Psychology, 1941,3, 315–335.
Wier, C. C, Jesteadt, W. &Green, D. M. A comparison of method of adjustment and forced-choice procedures in frequency discrimination.Perception & Psychophysics, 1976,19, 75–79.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This research was supported by Grants A8260 and A7919 from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kristofferson, A.B., Allan, L.G. & Campbell, F.A. On the detection of stepwise changes in a constant signal level. Perception & Psychophysics 30, 362–371 (1981). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206152
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206152