Abstract
It has recently been claimed (Geiger & Lettvin, 1987; Perry, Dember, Warm, & Sacks, 1989) that the acuity/eccentricity function is flatter in dyslexics than in normal subjects, with dyslexics showing better performance in the periphery and worse performance-at-fixation. In these studies, all target letters were presented to the right of fixation, a procedural flaw inviting subjects to optimize performance by directing attention and/or gaze to the right of the designated fixation point. It is suggested that dyslexic and normal readers may differ in the degree to which they might adopt the optimal strategy in this situation. To overcome this problem, target letters were briefly presented at 16 randomly intermixed locations derived from the orthogonal combination of four eccentricities and four directions from fixation (above, below, right, left). The accuracy of letter identification declined with increasing eccentricity at the same rate for good and poor adult readers and dyslexic teenagers. This finding provides no support for the view that the acuity/eccentricity function might vary with and possibly cause differences in reading level.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
D’Entremont, B., & Klein, R. M. (1989).Selective attention and coding ability in good and poor readers. Unpublished manuscript.
Hughes, A. (1977). The topography of vision in mammals of contrasting life style: Comparative optics and retinal organization. In F. Crescitette (Ed.),Handbook of sensory physiology (The visual system in evolution. A. Vertebrates; Vol. VII/5, pp. 615–737). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
Geiger, G., &Lettvin, J. Y. (1987). Peripheral vision in persons with dyslexia.New England Journal of Medicine,316, 1238–1243.
Perry, A. R., Dember, W. N., Warm, J. S., & Sacks, J. G. (1988, November).Letter identification in normal and dyslexic readers: A Replication. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Chicago.
Perry, A. R., Dember, W. N., Warm, J. S., &Sacks, J. G. (1989). Letter identification in normal and dyslexic readers: A verification.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society,27, 445–448.
Posner, M. I. (1980). Orienting of attention.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,32, 3–25.
Reed, A. V. (1979). Microcomputer display timing: Problems and solutions.Behavior Research Methods & Instrumentation,11, 572–576.
Shaywitz, B. A., &Waxman, S. G. (1987). Dyslexia.New England Journal of Medicine,316, 1260–1270.
Wechsler, D. (1944).The measurement of adult intelligence (3rd ed.). Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins.
Woodworth, R. S., &Schlosberg, H. (1954).Experimental psychology. New York: Rinehart & Winston.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
The research reported here was supported by a grant from the Natural Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada to R. Klein.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Klein, R., Berry, G., Briand, K. et al. Letter identification declines with increasing retinal eccentricity at the same rate for normal and dyslexic readers. Perception & Psychophysics 47, 601–606 (1990). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03203112
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03203112