Abstract
Three pigeons were exposed to a fixed-time response independent food-delivery schedule and a live target pigeon restrained in a holder mounted on a spring and microswitch assembly. This common method of recording aggression was compared with a photocell system, and both were evaluated by observation of video-tape recordings. Dependent variables included the number of interfood intervals with an attack, attacks per minute, and attack duration. The photocell proved more reliable than the microswitch and correlated highly with observations of both the number of interfood intervals with an attack for three subjects and attack duration for two. Neither apparatus provided accurate information about the rate of attacks. The microswitch apparatus was not sensitive to changes in the subject’s attack topography, while both recording devices were susceptible to activation by responses in the attacking pigeon other than discrete pecks or physical blows. In view of these findings, attacks per minute may not be an appropriate measure of aggression in studies using such devices.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Azrin, N. H., Hutchinson, R. R., &Hake, D. F. Estimetion-mduced aggression.Journal of the Experimental Analysts of Behavior, 1966,9, 191–204.
Brown, P. L., &Jenkins, H. M. Autoshaping of the pigeon’s key peck.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavion, 1968,11, 1–8.
Chereck, D. D., Thompson, T., &Heistad, G. T. Responding maintained by the opportunity to attack during an interval food-reinforcement schedule.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavion, 1973,19, 113–123.
Dovf, L. D. Rashotte, M. E., &Katz, H. N. Development and maintenance of attack in pigeons during variable-interval fernforcement of key pecking.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1974,21, 463–496.
Flory, R. K. Attack behavior as a function of a minimum interfood intervalJournal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1969,12, 825–828.
Knutson, J. F. Aggression during fixed-tatio and extinction components of a multiple schedule of reinforcement.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior 1970,13, 221–231
Richards, R. W., &Rilling, M. Aversive aspects of a fixed-interval, schedule of food reinforcementJournal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1972,17, 405–412.
Webbe, F. M., DeWeese, J., &Malagodi, E. F. Induced attack during multiple Fixed-ratio vat table-ratio schedules of reinforcementJournal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1974,22, 197–206
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This research was supported in part by a gift from the AIR Foundation. The authors thank Shan Juvelin for her valuable assistance and Deborah Muller for drawing the figures. Reprints may be obtained from either author, Department of Psychology, Utah State University, Logan, Utah 84322.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Muller, P.G., Cheney, C.D. The automatic recording of aggression in pigeons: A comparison of two methods with live targets. Behavior Research Methods & Instrumentation 7, 357–360 (1975). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03201538
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03201538