Abstract
The peak procedure was used in two experiments. Pigeons in the penalty group in Experiment 1 were rewarded with food in the first phase for the first peck after 12.5 sec had elapsed since the onset of a keylight. In the second phase, reward was withheld if the pigeons pecked within 6.25 sec after keylight onset. Responses in time were tabulated on occasional unrewarded tests in which the keylight was left on for 37.5 sec. Under the penalty contingencies, the response distribution in time remained nearly symmetric about the peak, while the spread of the distribution narrowed, and the time of peak responding came slightly earlier. The yoke group underwent a schedule of rewards similar to that for the penalty group, but without the penalty contingencies. Their response distributions remained similar throughout. The results of Experiment 1 were replicated in Experiment 2, which showed further that the changes due to the penalty contingencies did not generalize to the use of another key on which the penalty contingencies were not in effect. The narrower spread under the penalty contingencies is explained in terms of a change in threshold for when to start responding, and more weight being given to timing versus responding in the presence of the signal per se. No explanation was found for the change in the time of peak responding.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Cheng, K. (1989). The vector sum model of pigeon landmark use.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,15, 366–375.
Cheng, K. (in press). Three psychophysical principles in the processing of spatial and temporal information. In W. K. Honig & J. G. Fetterman (Eds.),Cognitive aspects of stimulus control. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Cheng, K., &Roberts, W. A. (1989). Timing multimodal events in pigeons.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior,52, 363–376.
Cheng, K., &Roberts, W. A. (1991). Three psychophysical principles of timing in pigeons.Learning & Motivation,22, 112–128.
Eberling, J. L., &Roberts, S. (1989, November).Striatum lesions selectively change one measure of time discrimination. Paper presented at the meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Atlanta.
Gibbon, J., &Church, R. M. (1984). Sources of variance in an information processing theory of timing. In H. L. Roitblat, T. G. Bever & H. S. Terrace (Eds.),Animal cognition (pp. 465–488). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Gibbon, J., &Church, R. M. (1990). Representation of time.Cognition,37, 23–54.
Hanson, H. M. (1959). Effects of discrimination training on stimulus generalization.Journal of Experimental Psychology,58, 321–333.
Roberts, S. (1981). Isolation of an internal clock.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,7, 242–268.
Roberts, S. (1982). Cross-modal use of an internal clock.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,8, 2–22.
Roberts, S. (in press). Use of independent and correlated measures to divide a time-discrimination mechanism into parts. In D. E. Meyer & S. Kornblum (Eds.),Attention and performance XIV: A silver jubilee.
Roberts, W. A., Cheng, K., &Cohen, J. S. (1989). Timing visual and auditory signals in pigeons.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,15, 23–35.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This research was supported by a National Sciences and Engineering Research Council grant to K. Cheng. I thank Sara Shettleworth for kindly letting us use her equipment, Richard Westwood for help in conducting the experiments, and two anonymous reviewers for helpful comments.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cheng, K. The form of timing distributions in pigeons under penalties for responding early. Animal Learning & Behavior 20, 112–120 (1992). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03200408
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03200408