Abstract
Pigeons’ pecks to the two elements of spatially separated compound samples were observed during matching-to-sample performance. An attentional biasing procedure was used in which the birds were tested on a subset of the information contained in the sample (either one of the two dimensions or one of the two sample key locations) for a large number of sessions. This procedure resulted in a greater proportion of sample pecks to the positively biased (tested during biasing) sample attribute. Increases in accuracy on the positively biased attribute as well as decreases in accuracy on the negatively biased (not tested during biasing) attribute were also found. However, not all of the shifts in matching accuracy could be explained by the shifts in pecking behavior.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Brown, P. L., &Jenkins, H. M. (1968). Auto-shaping of the pigeon’s key-peck.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior,11, 1–8.
Carter, D. E., &Werner, T. J. (1978). Complex learning and information processing by pigeons: A critical analysis.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior,29, 565–601.
Cook, R. G., Riley, D. A., & Brown, M. F. (1982, April).The role of element configuration in pigeon matching-to-compound sample performance. Paper presented at the meeting of the Western Psychological Association, Sacramento, CA.
Eckerman, D. A., Lanson, R. N., &Cumming, W. W. (1968). Acquisition and maintenance of matching without a required observing response.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior,11, 435–441.
Goodale, M. A. (1983). Visually guided pecking in the pigeon (Columba livia).Brain, Behavior and Evolution,22, 22–41.
Grant, D. S. (1981). Short-term memory in the pigeon. In N. E. Spear & R. R. Miller (Eds.),Information processing in animals. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Hearst, E., &Jenkins, H. M. (1974).Sign tracking: The stimulus-reinforcer relation and directed action. Austin, Texas: The Psychonomic Society.
Jenkins, H. M. (1973). Noticing and responding in a discrimination based on a distinguishing element.Learning and Motivation,4, 115–137.
Lamb, M. R., &Riley, D. A. (1981). Effects of element arrangement on the processing of compound stimuli in pigeons (Columba livia),Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,7, 45–58.
Leith, C. R., &Maki, W. S., Jr. (1975). Attention shifts during matching-to-sample performance in pigeons.Animal Learning & Behavior,3, 85–89.
Maki, W. S., Jr.,Gillund, G., Hauge, G., &Siders, W. A. (1977). Matching to sample after extinction of observing responses.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,3, 285–296.
Riley, D. A. (in press). Do pigeons decompose compound stimuli? In H. L. Roitblat, T. G. Bever, & H. S. Terrace (Eds.),Animal cognition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Riley, D. A., Cook, R. G., &Lamb, M. R. (1981). A classification and analysis of short-term retention codes in pigeons.Psychology of Learning and Motivation,15, 51–79.
Riley, D. A., &Leith, C. R. (1976). Multidimensional psychophysics and selective attention in animals.Psychological Bulletin,83, 138–160.
Riley, D. A., &Roitblat, H. L. (1978). Selective attention and related cognitive processes in pigeons. In S. H. Hulse, H. Fowler, & W. K. Honig (Eds.),Cognitive processes in animal behavior. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Roberts, W. A., &Grant, D. S. (1978). Interaction of sample and comparison stimuli in delayed matching to sample with the pigeon.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,4, 68–82.
Sacks, R. A., Kamil, A. C., &Mack, R. (1972). The effects of fixed-ratio sample requirements on matching to sample in the pigeon.Psychonomic Science,26, 291–293.
Schrier, A. M., &Povar, M. L. (1982). Eye movements of monkeys during discrimination learning: Role of visual scanning.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,8, 33–48.
Walls, G. L. (1942).The vertebrate eye and its adaptive radiation. New York: Hafner.
Wright, A. A., &Sands, S. F. (1981). A model of detection and decision processes during matching to sample by pigeons: Performance with 88 different wavelengths in delayed and simultaneous matching tasks.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,7, 191–216.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This research was supported by National Science Foundation Grant BNS 7908839.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Brown, M.F., Cook, R.G., Lamb, M.R. et al. The relation between response and attentional shifts in pigeon compound matching-to-sample performance. Animal Learning & Behavior 12, 41–49 (1984). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03199811
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03199811