Abstract
These experiments were performed to examine the effects of different types of primes across variations in prime set size, prime strength, and prior study in verification and lexical decision tasks. The primes consisted of taxonomic category names, associates, or rhymes that defined either small or large sets of related concepts, and they were either strongly or weakly related to their targets. Targets either were or were not studied prior to the priming task. The results indicated that, for taxonomic primes, shorter decision latencies were obtained when set size was smaller and when the target was studied before the priming task. In contrast, for rhymes, neither set size nor prior study had reliable effects. For all three types of primes, decision latencies were faster for stronger than for weaker prime-to-target relationships. These findings are contrasted with the results of manipulating these variables in episodic tasks such as cued recall, and they are interpreted in the context of a components-of-processing approach.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anderson, J. R. (1983).Language, memory, and thought. Hillsdale NJ; Erlbaum.
Canas, J. J. (1990). Associative strength effects in the lexical decisio task.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology; Human Expermental Psychology,42, 121–145.
Chang, T. M. (1986). Semantic memory; Facts and models.Psychological Bulletin,99, 199–220.
Chumbley, J. I. (1986). The roles of typicality, instance dominance and category dominance in verifying category membership.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,12 257–267.
Cohen, N. J., &Squire, L. R. (1980). Preserved learning and retertion of pattern-anal y zing skill in amnesia: Dissociation of “knowing how” and “knowing that.”Science,210, 207–209.
De Groot, A. M. B., Thomassen, A. J. W. M., &Hudson, P. T. W. (1982). Associative facilitation of word recognition as measured from a neutral prime.Memory & Cognition,10, 358–370.
Duchek, J. M., &Neei.Y, J. H. (1989). A dissociative word-frequene X levels-of-processing interaction in episodic recognition and lexica decision tasks.Memory & Cognition,17, 148–162.
Graf, P., &Mandler, G. (1984). Activation makes words more accessible, but not necessarily more retrievable.Journal of Verbal Learn ing & Verbal Behavior,23, 553–568.
Graf, P., &Schacter, D. L. (1987). Selective effects of interferece on implicit and explicit memory for new associations.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,13, 45–53
Hillinger, M. L. (1980). Priming effects with phonemically simila words: The encoding-bias hypothesis reconsidered.Memory & Cognition,8, 115–123.
Jacoby, L. L. (1983). Perceptual enhancement: Persistent effects dan experience.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Menory, & Cognition,9, 21–38.
Jacoby, L. L., ADallas, M. (1981). On the relationship between auto biographical memory and perceptual learning.Journal of Experiments Psychology: General,110, 306–340.
Joelson, J. M., &Herrmann, D. J. (1978). Properties of categorie in semantic memory.American Journal of Psychology,91. 101–114
Light, L. L., &Singh, A. (1987). Implicit and explicit memory in young and older adults.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,13, 531–541.
Martin, R. C. &Jensen, C. R. (1988). Phonological priming in the lexical decision task: A failure to replicate.Memory & Cognition.16, 505–521.
Mcevoy, C. L. (1988). Automatic and strategic processes in picture naming.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition.14, 618–626.
Mcevoy, C. L., &Nelson.D. L. (1982). Category name and instance norms for 106 categories of various sizes.American Journal of Psychology,95, 581–634.
Mcnamara, T. P., &Healy, A. F. (1988), Semantic, phonological. and mediated priming in reading and lexical decision.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,14, 398–409.
Meyer, D. E..Schvaneveldt, R. W., &Ruddy, M. G. (1974). Functions of graphemic and phonemic codes in visual word-recognition.Memory & Cognition,2, 309–321.
Neely, J. H. (1977). Semantic priming and retrieval from lexical memory: Roles of inhibitionless spreading activation and limitedcapacity attention.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,106, 226–254.
Neely, J. H. (1990). Semantic priming effects in visual word recognition: Selective review of current findings and theories. In D. Besner & G. Humphreys (Eds.),Basic processes in reading: Visual word recognition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Nelson, D. L. (1989). Implicitly activated knowledge and memory. In C. lzawa (Ed.),Current issues in cognitive process: The Tulane Floweree Symposium on cognition (pp. 367–387). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Nelson, D. L., Canas, J., &Bajo, M.-T. (1987). The effects of natural category size on memory for episodic encodings.Memorv & Cognition.15, 133–140.
Nelson, D. L., Canas, J. J., Bajo, M.-T., &Keelean, P. D. (1987). Comparing word fragment completion and cued recall with letter cues.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memorv, & Cognition,13, 542–552.
Nelson, D. L., Keelean, P. D., &Negrao, M. (1989). Word-fragment cuing: The iexical search hypothesis.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,15, 388–397.
Nelson, D. I., &Mcevoy, C. L. (1979). Encoding context and setsize.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory,5, 292–314.
Nelson, D. L., Mcevoy, C. L., &Bajo, M.-T. (1988). Lexical and semantic search in cued recall, fragment completion, perceptual identification, and recognition.American Journal of Psychology,101, 465–480.
Nelson, D. L., Mcevoy, C. L., &Friedrich, M. A. (1982). Extra list cuing and retrieval inhibition.Journal of Experimental Psychology: learning, Memory, & Cognition,8, 89–105.
Posner, M. L. &Snyder, C. R. R. (1975). Attention and cognitive control. In R. L. Solso (Ed.),Information processing and cognition: The Loyola Symposium (pp. 55–85). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Raaijmakers, J. G. W., &Shjffrin, R. M. (1981). Search of associative memory.Psychological Review,88, 454–462.
Roediger, H. L., III, &Blaxton, T. A. (1987). Effects of varying modality, surface features, and retention interval on priming in wordfragment completion.Memory & Cognition,15, 379–388.
Si-Iulman, H. G..Hornak, R., &Sanders, E. (1978). The effects of graphemic. phonetic, and semantic relationships on access TO lexical structures.Memory & Cognition,6, 115–123.
Squire, L. R., Shimamura, A., &Grae, P. (1985). Independence of recognition memory and priming effects: A neuropsychological analysis.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memom, & Cognition.11, 37–44.
Thorndike, E. L., &Lorce, I. (1944).The teachers word hook of 30,000 words. New York: Columbia University Press.
Tulving, E. (1985). How many memory systems are there?American Psychologist,40, 385–398.
Tweedy, J. R., Lapinski, R. H., &Schvaneveldt, R. W. (1977). Semantic-context effects on word recognition: Influence of varying the proportion of items presented in an appropriate context.Memory & Cognition,5, 84–99.
Wike, E. L,, &Church, J. D. (1976). Comments on Clark’s “The-language-as-fixed-effect-fallacy.”Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,15, 249–255.
Wilkins, A. J. (1971). Conjoint frequency, category size, and categorization time.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,10, 382–385.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This research was supported by Grant NIMH 16360 to Douglas L. Nelson, from the National Institute of Mental Health.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Nelson, D.L., LaLomia, M.J. & Canas, J.J. Dissociative effects in different prime domains. Memory & Cognition 19, 44–62 (1991). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03198495
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03198495