Abstract
Two experiments investigated the role of verbalization in memory for environmental sounds. Experiment i extended earlier research (Bower & Holyoak, 1973) showing that sound recognition is highly dependent upon consistent verbal interpretation at input and test. While such a finding implies an important role for verbalization, Experiment 2 suggested that verbalization is not the only efficacious strategy for encoding environmental sounds. Recognition after presentation of sounds was shown to differ qualitatively from recognition after presentation of sounds accompanied with interpretative verbal labels and from recognition after presentation of verbal labels alone. The results also suggest that encoding physical information about sounds is of greater importance for sound recognition than for verbal free recall, and that verbalization is of greater importance for free recall than for recognition. Several alternative frameworks for the results are presented, and separate retrieval and discrimination processes in recognition are proposed.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bahrick, H. P., &Barrick, P. Independence of verbal and visual codes of the same stimuli.Journal of Experimental Psychology. 1971,91, 344–346.
Bahrick, H. P., Barrick, P,O., &Wittlinger, R, P. Fifty years of memory for names and faces: A crosssectional approach.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 1975,104, 54–75.
Bahrick, H. P., &Boucher, B. Retention of visual and and verbal codes of the same stimuli.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1968,78,417–422.
Bartlett, F. C.Remembering: A study in experimental and social psychology. Cambridge. England: The University Press. 1932.
Bower, G. H., &Holyoak, K. Encoding and recognition memory for naturalistic sounds.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1973,101, 360–366.
Brown, R., &Lenneberg, E. H. A study in language and cognition.The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1954,49, 454–462.
Cooper, F. S., &Mattingly, I. G. Computer-controlled PCM system for investigation of dichotic speech perception.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 1969,46, 115. (Abstract)
Ellis, H. C. Stimulus encoding processes in human learning and memory. In G. H. Bower (Ed.),The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 7). New York: Academic Press. 1974.
Grey, D. R., &Morgan, B. J. T. Some aspects of ROC curve-fitting: Normal and logistic models.Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 1972,9, 128–139.
Grier, J. B. Nonparametric indexes for sensitivity and bias: Computing formulas.Psychological Bulletin, 1971,75, 424–429.
Hodos, W. Nonparametric index of responses bias for use in detection and recognition experiments.Psychological Bulletin, 1970,74, 351–354.
Humphreys, M. S. Relational information and the context effect in recognition memory.Memory & Cognition. 1976,4, 221–232.
Kosslyn, S. M., Holyoak, K. J.. &Huffman, C. S. A processing approach to the dual coding hypothesis.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 1976,2, 223–233.
Kurtz, K. H., &Hovland, C. I. The effect of verbalization during observation of stimulus objects upon accuracy of recognition and recall.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1953,45, 157–164.
Mandler, G. Organization and recognition. In E. Tulving & W. Donaldson (Eds.),Organization of memory. New York: Academic Press. 1972.
Martin, E. Generation-recognition theory and the encoding specificity principle.Psychological Review, 1975,82, 150–153.
Paivio, A.Imagery and verbal processes, New York: Holt, Rinehart. & Winston. 1971.
Paivio, A., &Csapo, K. Concrete image and verbal memory codes.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1969,80, 279–285.
Paivio, A., &Csapo, K. Picture superiority in free recall: Imagery or dual coding?Cognitive Psychology, 1973,5, 176–206.
Paivio, A., Philipchalk, R., &Rowe, E. J. Free and serial recall of pictures, sounds. and words.Memory & Cognition, 1975,3, 586–590.
Philipchalk, R. P.. &Rowe, E. J. Sequential and nonsequential memory for verbal and nonverbal auditory stimuli.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1971,91, 341–343.
Posner, M. I.Cognition: An introduction. Glenview. Ill: Scott. Foresman, 1973.
Price, R. H., &Slive, A. B. Verbal processes in shape recognition.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1970,83, 373–389.
Reder, L. M., Anderson, J. R., &Bjork, R. A. A semantic interpretation of encoding specificity.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1974,102, 648–656.
Shiffrin, R. M. Visual free recall.Science, 1973,180, 980–981.
Thomson, D. M. Context effects in recognition memory.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior. 1972,11, 497–511.
Tversky, B. Encoding processes in recognition and recall.Cognitive Psychology, 1973,5, 275–287.
Tversky, B. Eye fixations in prediction of recognition and recall.Memory & Cognition, 1974,2, 275–278.
Wyant, S., Banks, W. P., Berger, D., &Wright, P. W. Verbal and pictorial similarity in recognition of pictures.Perception & Psychophysics, 1972,12, 151–153.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This report is based on a dissertation submitted to Yale University in 1975.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bartlett, J.C. Remembering environmental sounds: The role of verbalization at input. Memory & Cognition 5, 404–414 (1977). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197379
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197379