Abstract
The aim of the present paper was to investigate how the kinematics of a hand reaching toward a visual target would be influenced by haptic and proprioceptive input from an unseen distractor actively grasped in the other, nonreaching hand. The main results were that the amplitude of maximum grip aperture was smaller and the time to maximum grip aperture was earlier when the distractor was smaller than the target. The interference effect from the distractor was similar for both hands as they reached. Furthermore, results from a vibrating-distractor condition for passive tactile input revealed that the interference effects were evident only when the distractor was actively grasped. We suggest that neural processing of proprioceptive and tactile information relevant to distractor size produced the observed interference effects. We also emphasize the importance of active manipulation of the distractor stimulus in eliciting such interference effects.
Article PDF
References
Bonfiglioli, C., &Castiello, U. (1998). Dissociation of covert and overt spatial attention during prehension movements: Selective interference effects.Perception & Psychophysics,60, 1426–1440.
Burke, D., Gandevia, S. C., &Macefield, G. (1988). Responses to passive movement of receptors in joint, skin and muscle of the human hand.Journal of Physiology,402, 347–361.
Castiello, U. (1996). Grasping a fruit: Selection for action.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,22, 582–603.
Castiello, U. (1999). Mechanisms of selection for the control of hand action.Trends in Cognitive Sciences,3, 264–271.
Chapman, C. E. (1994). Active versus passive touch: Factors influencing the transmission of somatosensory signals to primary somatosensory cortex.Canadian Journal of Physiology & Pharmacology,72, 558–570.
Cordo, P., Carlton, L., Bevan, L., Carlton, M., &Kerr, G. K. (1994). Proprioceptive coordination of movement sequences: Role of velocity and position information. Journal of Neurophysiology,71, 1848–1861.
D’Amico, M., &Ferrigno, G. (1992). Comparison between the more recent techniques for smoothing and derivative assessment in biomechanics.Medical Biology & Engineering Computing,30, 193–204.
Deubel, H., Schneider, W. X., &Paprotta, I. (1998). Selective dorsal and ventral processing: Evidence for a common attentional mechanism in reaching and perception.Visual Cognition,5, 81–107.
Doyle, M. C., &Walker, R. (2002). Multisensory interactions in saccade target selection: Curved saccade trajectories.Experimental Brain Research,142, 116–130.
Driver, J., &Spence, C. (1999). Cross-modal links in spatial attention. In G. W. Humphreys, J. Duncan, & A. Treisman (Eds.),Attention, space and action: Studies in cognition neuroscience (pp. 130–149). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Gentilucci, M., Daprati, E., &Gangitano, M. (1998). Haptic information differentially interferes with visual analysis in reaching-grasping control and in perceptual processes.NeuroReport,9, 887–891.
Ghez, C., &Krakauer, J. (2000). The organization of movement. In E. R. Kandel, J. H. Schwartz, & T. M. Jessell (Eds.),Principles of neural science (pp. 653–673). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Gibson, J. J. (1962). Observations on active touch.Psychological Review,69, 477–491.
Graziano, M. S., &Gross, C. G. (1993). A bimodal map of space: Somatosensory receptive fields in the macaque putamen with corresponding visual receptive fields.Experimental Brain Research,97, 96–109.
Haggard, P. (1991). Task coordination in human prehension.Journal of Motor Behavior,23, 25–37.
Hermsdörfer, J., Ulrich, S., Marquardt, C., Goldenberg, G., &Mai, N. (1999). Prehension with the ipsilesional hand after unilateral brain damage.Cortex,35, 139–161.
Jackson, G. M., Jackson, S. R., &Kritikos, A. (1999). Attention for action: Coordinating bimanual reach-to-grasp movements.British Journal of Psychology,90, 247–270.
Jakobson, L. S., &Goodale, M. A. (1991). Factors affecting higherorder movement planning: A kinematic analysis of human prehension.Experimental Brain Research,86, 199–208.
Jeannerod, M. (1981). Intersegmental coordination during reaching at natural visual objects. In J. [B.] Long & A. [D.] Baddeley (Eds.),Attention and performance IX (pp. 153–168). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Johansson, R. S., &Cole, K. J. (1994). Grasp stability during manipulative actions.Canadian Journal of Physiology & Pharmacology,72, 511–524.
Johnson, K. O., Yoshioka, T., &Vega-Bermudez, F. (2000). Tactile functions of mechanoreceptive afferents innervating the hand.Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology,17, 539–558.
Jolicäur, P. (1999). Restricted attentional capacity between sensory modalities.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,6, 87–92.
Kelso, J. A. S., Southard, D. L., &Goodman, D. (1979). On the coordination of two-handed movements.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,5, 229–238.
Sanes, J. N., &Schieber, M. H. (2001). Orderly somatotopy in primary motor cortex: Does it exist?NeuroImage,13, 968–974.
Spence, C., Pavani, F., &Driver, J. (2000). Crossmodal links between vision and touch in covert endogenous spatial attention.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,26, 1298–1319.
Stein, B. E. (1998). Neural mechanisms for synthesizing sensory information and producing adaptive behaviors.Experimental Brain Research,123, 124–135.
Tipper, S. P., Howard, L. A., &Jackson, S. R. (1997). Selective reaching to grasp: Evidence for distractor interference effects.Visual Cognition,4, 1–38.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Patchay, S., Castiello, U. & Haggard, P. A cross-modal interference effect in grasping objects. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 10, 924–931 (2003). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196553
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196553