Abstract
Category clustering is a robust finding in the free recall of familiar category members, but has rarely been studied with artificial categories. In the present study, college students learned artificial categories via stimulus-equivalence methodology. Arbitrary match-to-sample training with nonsense syllables established three interrelated conditional discriminations, and, for most subjects, unreinforced test trials revealed the emergent stimulus-control relations considered to be evidence of equivalence classes. Free-recall tests revealed evidence of significant within-class clustering both before and after equivalence testing, but was more pronounced after the equivalence tests. These findings confirm that classic phenomena like clustering in free recall can be studied with stimulus-equivalence methodology, thus allowing for experimental control over relevant variables.
Article PDF
References
Anderson, J. R. &Bower, G. H. (1974).Human associative memory. Washington, DC: Wiley.
Bousfield, W. A. (1953). The occurrence of clustering in the recall of randomly arranged associates.Journal of General Psychology,49, 229–240.
Casey, P. J., &Heath, R. A. (1983). Categorization reaction time, category structure, and category size in semantic memory using artificial categories.Memory & Cognition,11, 228–236.
Dube, W. V. (1991). Computer software for stimulus control research with Macintosh computers.Experimental Analysis of Human Behavior Bulletin,9, 28–30.
Eikeseth, S., &Smith, T. (1992). The development of functional and equivalence classes in high-functioning autistic children: The role of naming.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior,58, 123–133.
Hayes, S. C., Gifford, E. V., &Wilson, K. G. (1996). Stimulus classes and stimulus relations: Arbitrary applicable relational responding as an operant. In T. R. Zentall & P. M. Smeets,Stimulus class formation in humans and animals. The Netherlands: Elsevier.
Heit, E. (1997). Knowledge & concept learning. In K. Lamberts & D. Shanks (Eds.)Knowledge, concepts and categories (pp. 7–42). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Keil, F. C. (1989).Concepts, kinds, and cognitive development. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Lipkens, R., Hayes, S.C., &Hayes, L.J. (1993). Longitudinal study of the development of derived relations in an infant.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology,56, 201–239.
Margolis, E., &Laurence, S. (1999).Concepts: Core readings. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
McIlvane, W. J., Dube, W. V., Kledaras, J. B., Iennaco, F. M., Stoddard, L. T. (1990). Teaching relational discrimination to individuals with mental retardation: Some problems and possible solutions.American Journal on Mental Retardation,95, 283–296.
Murphy, G. L., &Medin, D. L. (1985). The role of theories in conceptual coherence.Psychological Review,92, 289–316.
Pilgrim, C., &Galizio, M. (1996). Stimulus equivalence: A class of correlations or a correlation of classes. In T. R. Zentall & P. M. Smeets,Stimulus class formation in humans and animals. The Netherlands: Elsevier.
Pilgrim, C., Jackson, J., &Galizio, M. (2000). Acquisition of arbitrary conditional discriminations by young normally developing children.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior,73, 177–193.
Roenker, D. L., Thompson, C. P., &Brown, S. C. (1971). Comparison of measures for the estimation of clustering in free recall.Psychological Bulletin,76, 45–48.
Rosch, E., &Mervis, C. B. (1975). Family resemblances: Studies in the internal structure of categories.Cognitive Psychology,7, 573–605.
Schusterman, R. J., &Kastak, D. (1993). A California sea lion (Zalophus californianus) is capable of forming equivalence relations.Psychological Record,43, 823–839.
Sidman, M. (1994).Equivalence relations and behavior: A research story. Boston: Authors Cooperative.
Sidman, M., Kirk, R., &Willson-Morris, M. (1985). Six-member stimulus classes generated by conditional-discrimination procedures.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior,43, 21–42.
Sidman, M., &Tailby, W. (1982). Conditional discrimination vs. matching to sample: An expansion of the testing paradigm.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior,37, 5–22.
Tulving, E., &Donaldson, W. (1972).Organization of memory. New York: Academic Press.
Urcuioli, P. J. (1996). Acquired equivalences and mediated generalization in pigeon’s matching-to-sample. In T. R. Zentall & P. M. Smeets,Stimulus class formation in humans and animals. The Netherlands: Elsevier.
Wilkinson, K. M., Dube, W. V., &McIlvane, W. J. (1998). Fast mapping and exclusion (emergent matching) in developmental language, behavior analysis, and animal cognition research.Psychological Record,48, 407–422.
Zentall, T. R. (1996). An analysis of stimulus class formation in animals. In T. R. Zentall & P. M. Smeets,Stimulus class formation in humans and animals. The Netherlands: Elsevier Science.
Zentall, T. R., &Smeets, P. M. (Eds.) (1996).Stimulus class formation in humans and animals. The Netherlands: Elsevier.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This work was supported in part by NICHD Grant HD34265.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Galizio, M., Stewart, K.L. & hPilgrim, C. Clustering in artificial categories: An equivalence analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 8, 609–614 (2001). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196197
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196197