Abstract
When subjects switch between tasks, performance is slower after a task switch than after a task repetition, even when preparation time is long. We report two experiments that support the idea that a large part of these residual task shift costs can be due to stimulus-cued retrieval of previous task episodes. We demonstrate that there are two different factors at work: (1) facilitation of response to the current distractor stimulus, appropriate to the previously relevant, competing task (competitor priming), and (2) impaired processing of previously suppressed responses (negative priming). Negative priming was contingent on the size of the stimulus set, suggesting that distractor suppression comes into effect only if the distractors are highly activated. Importantly, both types of interference interacted with task readiness: Whereas in the nondominant task (picture naming), switch and nonswitch trials were equally affected, the dominant task (word reading) showed priming effects on switch trials only. Thus, the retrieval of previous processing episodes has a selective impact on situations in which task competition is high.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allport, D. A. (1987). Selection for action: Some behavioral and neurophysiological considerations of attention and action. In H. Heuer & A. F. Sanders (Eds.),Perspectives on perception and action (pp. 395–419). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Allport, D. A., Styles, E. A., &Hsieh, S. (1994). Shifting intentional set: Exploring the dynamic control of tasks. In C. Umiltà & M. Moscovitch (Eds.),Attention and performance XV: Conscious and nonconscious information processing (pp. 421–452). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, Bradford Books.
Allport, D. A., Tipper, S. P., &Chmiel, N. R. J. (1985). Perceptual integration and postcategorical filtering. In M. I. Posner & O. S. M. Marin (Eds.),Attention and performance XI (pp. 107–132). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Allport, D. A., &Wylie, G. (1999). Task-switching: Positive and neg ative priming of task-set. In G. W. Humphreys, J. Duncan, & A. M. Treisman (Eds.),Attention, space and action: Studies in cognitive neuroscience (pp. 273–296). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Allport, D. A., &Wylie, G. (2000). “Task-switching” stimulus-response bindings and negative priming. In S. Monsell & J. Driver (Eds.),Control of cognitive processes: Attention and performance XVIII (pp. 35–70). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Altmann, E. M., &Gray, W. D. (2002). Forgetting to remember: The functional relationship of decay and interference.Psychological Science,13, 27–33.
Arrington, C. M., &Logan, G. D. (2004). Episodic and semantic components of the compound-stimulus strategy in the explicit taskcuing procedure.Memory & Cognition,32, 965–978.
Braver, T. S., &Cohen, J. D. (2000). On the control of control: The role of dopamine in regulating prefrontal function and working memory. In S. Monsell & J. Driver (Eds.),Control of cognitive processes: Attention and performance XVIII (pp. 713–737). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Burnage, G. (1990).CELEX: A guide for users. Nijmegen: SSN.
DeSchepper, B., &Treisman, A. (1996). Visual memory for novel shapes: Implicit coding without attention.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,22, 27–47.
Desimone, R., &Duncan, J. (1995). Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention.Annual Review of Neuroscience,18, 193–222.
Ellis, A. W., Young, A. W., &Flude, B. M. (1990). Repetition priming and face processing: Priming occurs within the system that responds to the identity of a face.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,42A, 495–512.
Fagot, C. (1994).Chronometric investigation of task switching. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, San Diego.
Fox, E. (1995). Negative priming from ignored distractors in visual selection: A review.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,2, 145–173.
Glaser, W. R., &Düngelhoff, F.-J. (1984). The time course of picture-word interference.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,10, 640–654.
Gopher, D., Armony, L., &Greenshpan, Y. (2000). Switching tasks and attention policies.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,129, 308–339.
Goschke, T. (2000). Involuntary persistence and intentional reconfiguration in task-set switching. In S. Monsell & J. Driver (Eds.),Attention and performance XVIII: Control of cognitive processes (pp. 331–355). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Hommel, B. (1998). Event files: Evidence for automatic integration of stimulus-response episodes.Visual Cognition,5, 183–216.
Hommel, B. (2004).Feature integration across perception and action: Event files affect response choice. Manuscript submitted for publication.
Hommel, B., Pösse, B., &Waszak, F. (2000). Contextualization in perception and action.Psychologica Belgica,40, 227–245.
Kimberg, D. Y., &Farah, M. J. (1993). A unified account of cognitive impairments following frontal lobe damage: The role of working memory in complex, organized behavior.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,122, 411–428.
Koch, I., & Allport, A. (in press). Cue-based preparation and stimulusbased priming of tasks in task switching.Memory & Cognition.
Logan, G. D. (1988). Toward an instance theory of automatization.Psychological Review,95, 492–527.
Logan, G. D., &Gordon, R. D. (2001). Executive control of visual attention in dual-task situations.Psychological Review,108, 393–434.
Lowe, D. (1998). Long-term positive and negative identity priming: Evidence for episodic retrieval.Memory & Cognition,26, 435–443.
Lupker, S. J., &Katz, A. N. (1981). Input, decision, and response factors in picture-word interference.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory,7, 269–282.
MacLeod, C. M. (1991). Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: An integrative review.Psychological Bulletin,109, 163–203.
MacLeod, C. M., &Dunbar, K. (1988). Training and Stroop-like interference: Evidence for a continuum of automaticity.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,14, 126–135.
Malley, G. B., &Strayer, D. L. (1995). Effect of stimulus repetition on positive and negative identity priming.Perception & Psychophysics,57, 657–667.
May, C. P., Kane, M. J., &Hasher, L. (1995). Determinants of negative priming.Psychological Bulletin,118, 35–54.
Mayr, U., &Keele, S. W. (2000). Changing internal constraints on action: The role of backward inhibition.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,129, 4–26.
Meiran, N. (1996). Reconfiguration of processing mode prior to task performance.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,22, 1423–1442.
Meiran, N. (2000). Modeling cognitive control in task-switching.Psychological Research,63, 234–249.
Meiran, N., Chorev, Z., &Sapir, A. (2000). Component processes in task switching.Cognitive Psychology,41, 211–253.
Milliken, B., &Tipper, S. P. (1998). Attention and inhibition. In H. Pashler (Ed.),Attention (pp. 191–221). San Diego: Psychology Press.
Monsell, S. (1985). Repetition and the lexicon. In A. W. Ellis (Ed.),Progress in the psychology of language (Vol. 2, pp. 147–195). London: Erlbaum.
Neill, W. T. (1977). Inhibitory and facilitatory processes in selective attention.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,3, 444–450.
Neill, W. T. (1997). Episodic retrieval in negative priming and repetition priming.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,23, 1291–1305.
Neill, W. T., &Valdes, L. A. (1992). Persistence of negative priming: Steady state or decay?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,18, 565–576.
Neill, W. T., Valdes, L. A., Terry, K. M., &Gorfein, D. S. (1992). Persistence of negative priming: II. Evidence for episodic trace retrieval.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,18, 993–1000.
Rogers, R. D., &Monsell, S. (1995). Costs of a predictable switch between simple cognitive tasks.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,124, 207–231.
Rubinstein, J., Meyer, D. E., &Evans, J. E. (2001). Executive control of cognitive processes in task switching.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,27, 763–797.
Ruthruff, E., Remington, R. W., &Johnston, J. C. (2001). Switching between simple cognitive tasks: The interaction of top-down and bottom-up factors.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,27, 1404–1419.
Scarborough, D. L., Gerard, L., &Cortese, C. (1979). Accessing lexical memory: The transfer of word repetition effects across task and modality.Memory & Cognition,7, 3–12.
Snodgrass, J. G., &Vanderwart, M. (1980). A standardized set of 260 pictures: Norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory,6, 174–215.
Sohn, M.-H., &Anderson, J. R. (2001). Task preparation and task repetition: Two-component model of task switching.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,130, 764–778.
Sohn, M.-H., &Carlson, R. A. (2000). Effects of repetition and foreknowledge in task-set reconfiguration.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,26, 1445–1460.
Strayer, D. L., &Grison, S. (1999). Negative identity priming is contingent on stimulus repetition.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,25, 24–38.
Stroop, J. R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions.Journal of Experimental Psychology,18, 643–662.
Tipper, S. P. (1985). The negative priming effect: Inhibitory priming by ignored objects.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,37A, 571–590.
Tipper, S. P., &Cranston, M. (1985). Selective attention and priming: Inhibitory and facilitatory effects of ignored primes.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,37A, 591–611.
Tipper, S. P., Weaver, B., &Houghton, G. (1994). Behavioural goals determine inhibitory mechanisms of selective attention.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,47A, 809–840.
Warren, R. E. (1972). Stimulus encoding and memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology,94, 90–100.
Warren, R. E. (1974). Association, directionality and stimulus encoding.Journal of Experimental Psychology,102, 151–158.
Waszak, F., Hommel, B., &Allport, A. (2003). Task-switching and long-term priming: Role of episodic stimulus-task bindings in taskshift costs.Cognitive Psychology,46, 361–413.
Waszak, F., Hommel, B., &Allport, A. (2004). Semantic generalization of stimulus-task bindings.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,11, 1027–1033.
Wylie, G., &Allport, A. (2000). Task switching and the measurement of “switch costs”.Psychological Research,63, 212–233.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
The research reported in this article was carried out as part of F.W.’s doctoral studies.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Waszak, F., Hommel, B. & Allport, A. Interaction of task readiness and automatic retrieval in task switching: Negative priming and competitor priming. Mem Cogn 33, 595–610 (2005). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195327
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195327