Abstract
In studies of the mere exposure effect, rapid presentation of items can increase liking without accurate recognition. The effect on liking has been explained as a misattribution of fluency caused by prior presentation. However, fluency is also a source of feelings of familiarity. It is, therefore, surprising that prior experience can enhance liking without also causing familiarity-based recognition. We suggest that when study opportunities are minimal and test items are perceptually similar, people adopt an analytic approach, attempting to recognize distinctive features. That strategy fails because rapid presentation prevents effective encoding of such features; it also prevents people from experiencing fluency and a consequent feeling of familiarity. We suggest that the liking-without-recognition effect results from using an effective (nonanalytic) strategy in judging pleasantness, but an ineffective (analytic) strategy in recognition. Explanations of the mere exposure effect based on a distinction between implicit and explicit memory are unnecessary.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Begg, I., &Armour, V. (1991). Repetition and the ring of truth: Biasing comments.Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science,23, 195–213.
Bonnano, G. A., &Stillings, N. A. (1986). Preference, familiarity and recognition after repeated brief exposures to random geometric shapes.American Journal of Psychology,99, 403–415.
Bornstein, R. F., &D'Agostino, P. R. (1992). Stimulus recognition and the mere exposure effect.Journal of Personality & Social Psychology,63, 545–552.
Bornstein, R. F., &D'Agostino, P. R. (1994). The attribution and discounting of perceptual fluency: Preliminary tests of a perceptual fluency/ attributional model of the mere exposure effect.Social Cognition,12, 103–128.
Bornstein, R. F., Leone, D. R., &Galley, D. J. (1987). The generalizability of subliminal mere exposure effects: Influence of stimuli perceived without awareness of social behavior.Journal of Personality & Social Psychology,53, 1070–1079.
Carroll, M., & Masson, M. E. J. (1992).Reading fluency as a basis for judgments of text comprehension: Misattributions of the effects of past experience. Unpublished manuscript.
Craik, F. I. M., &Lockhart, R. S. (1972). Levels of processing: A framework for memory research.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,11, 671–684.
Gardiner, J. M., &Java, R. I. (1990). Recollective experience in word and nonword recognition.Memory & Cognition,18, 23–30.
Jacoby, L. L., Allan, L. G., Collins, J. C., &Larwill, L. K. (1988. Memory influences subjective experience: Noise judgments.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,14, 240–247.
Jacoby, L. L., &Dallas, M. (1981). On the relationship between autobiographical memory and perceptual learning.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,110, 306–340.
Jacoby, L. L., &Whitehouse, K. (1989). An illusion of memory: False recognition influenced by unconscious perception.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,118, 126–135.
Jacoby, L. L., Woloshyn, V., &Kelley, C. M. (1989). Becoming famous without being recognized: Unconscious influences of memory produced by dividing attention.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,118, 115–125.
Johnson, M. K., Hashtroudi, S., &Lindsay, D. S. (1993). Source monitoring.Psychological Bulletin,114, 3–28.
Kelley, C. M., &Jacoby, L. L. (1990). The construction of subjective experience: Memory attributions.Mind & Language,5, 49–68.
Kunst-Wilson, W. R., &Zajonc, R. B. (1980). Affective discrimination of stimuli that cannot be recognized.Science,207, 557–558.
Leboe, J. P., & Whittlesea, B. W. A. (2000).The inferential basis of familiarity and recall: Evidence for a common underlying process. Manuscript submitted for publication.
Lindsay, D. S., &Kelley, C. M. (1996). Creating illusions of familiarity in a cued recall remember/know paradigm.Journal of Memory & Language,35, 197–211.
Lindsay, D. S., &Read, J. D. (1994). Psychotherapy and memory for childhood sexual abuse: A cognitive perspective.Applied Cognitive Psychology,8, 281–337.
MacLeod, C. M., &Masson, M. E. J. (1997). Priming patterns are different in masked word identification and word fragment completion.Journal of Memory & Language,36, 461–483.
Mandler, G. (1980). Recognizing: The judgment of previous occurrence.Psychological Review,87, 252–271.
Mandler, G. (1991). Your face looks familiar but I can't remember your name: A review of dual process theory. In W. E. Hockley & S. Lewandowsky (Eds.),Relating theory and data: Essays in honor of Bennett B. Murdock (pp. 207–225). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Mandler, G., Nakamura, Y., &van Zandt, B. J. (1987). Nonspecific effects of exposure to stimuli that cannot be recognized.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,13, 646–648.
Masson, M. E. J., &Caldwell, J. I. (1998). Conceptually driven encoding episodes create perceptual misattributions.Acta Psychologica,98, 183–210.
Morris, C. D., Bransford, J. D., &Franks, J. J. (1977). Levels of processing versus transfer-appropriate processing.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,16, 519–533.
Rajaram, S. (1993). Remembering and knowing: Two means of access to the personal past.Memory & Cognition,21, 89–102.
Roediger, H. L., III, & McDermott, K. B. (1995). Creating false memories: Remembering words not presented in lists.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,21, 803–814.
Schacter, D. L. (1990). Perceptual representation systems and implicit memory: Toward a resolution of the multiple memory systems debate. In A. Diamond (Ed.),Development and neural bases of higher cognitive functions (Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, Vol. 608, pp. 543–372). New York: New York Academy of Sciences.
Schacter, D. L., Cooper, L. A., Delaney, S. M., Peterson, M. A., &Tharan, M. (1991). Implicit memory for impossible and possible objects: Constraints on the construction of structural descriptions.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,17, 3–19.
Seamon, J. G., Brody, N., &Kauf, D. M. (1983a). Affective discrimination of stimuli that are not recognized: I. Effects of shadowing, masking, and cerebral laterality.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,9, 544–555.
Seamon, J. G., Brody, N., &Kauf, D. M. (1983b). Affective discrimination of stimuli that are not recognized: II. Effects of delay between study and test.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society,21, 187–189.
Seamon, J. G., Marsh, R. L., &Brody, N. (1984). Critical importance of exposure duration for affective discrimination of stimuli that are not recognized.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,10, 465–469.
Seamon, J. G., Williams, P. C., Crowley, M. J., Kim, I. J., Langer, S. A., Orne, P. J., &Wishengrad, D. L. (1995). The mere exposure effect is based on implicit memory: Effects of stimulus type, encoding conditions, and number of exposures on recognition and affect judgments.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,21, 711–721.
Squire, L. R. (1992). Memory and the hippocampus: A synthesis from findings with rats, monkeys, and humans.Psychological Review,99, 195–231.
Tulving, E., &Thompson, D. M. (1973). Encoding specif icity and retrieval processes in episodic memory.Psychological Review,80, 352–373.
Whittlesea, B. W. A. (1993). Illusions of familiarity.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,19, 1235–1253.
Whittlesea, B. W. A. (1997). Production, evaluation and preservation of experiences: Constructive processing in remembering and performance tasks. In D. L. Medin (Ed.),The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 37, pp. 211–264). New York: Academic Press.
Whittlesea, B. W. A., Brooks, L. R., &Westcott, C. (1994). After the learning is over: Factors controlling the selective application of general and particular knowledge.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,20, 259–274.
Whittlesea, B. W. A., Jacoby, L. L., &Girard, K. (1990). Illusions of immediate memory: Evidence of an attributional basis for feelings of familiarity and perceptual quality.Journal of Memory & Language,29, 716–732.
Whittlesea, B. W. A., &Leboe, J. P. (2000). The heuristic basis of remembering and classification: Fluency, generation and resemblance.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,129, 84–106.
Whittlesea, B. W. A., &Williams, L. D. (1998). Why do strangers feel familiar, but friends don't? The unexpected basis of feelings of familiarity.Acta Psychologica,98, 141–166.
Whittlesea, B. W. A., &Williams, L. D. (2000). The source of feelings of familiarity: The discrepancy-attribution hypothesis.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,26, 547–565.
Whittlesea, B. W. A., &Williams, L. D. (2001a). The discrepancyattribution hypothesis: I. The heuristic basis of feelings and familiarity.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,27, 3–13.
Whittlesea, B. W. A., &Williams, L. D. (2001b). The discrepancyattribution hypothesis: II. Expectation, uncertainty, surprise and feelings of familiarity.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,27, 14–33.
Witherspoon, D., &Allan, L. G. (1985). The effect of a prior presentation on temporal judgments in a perceptual identification task.Memory & Cognition,13, 101–111.
Zajonc, R. B. (1968). Attitudinal effects of mere exposure.Journal of Personality & Social Psychology Monographs,9(2, Pt. 2), 1–27.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This research was supported by a grant to B.W.A.W. from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Whittlesea, B.W.A., Price, J.R. Implicit /explicit memory versus analytic/nonanalytic processing: Rethinking the mere exposure effect. Memory & Cognition 29, 234–246 (2001). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194917
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194917