Abstract
Watson and Humphreys (1997) have proposed that prioritized selection of new over old elements occurs because observers can apply top-down inhibition to the locations of the old elements by a mechanism they refer to as visual marking. However, recent evidence has suggested that the top-down mechanism is questionable (Donk & Theeuwes, 2001). In the present study, we investigated whether prioritized selection of new over old elements occurs in a bottom-up or a top-down fashion. Observers were presented with displays containing one set of elements (old elements) followed, after a certain time interval, by a second set of elements (new elements). The observers were instructed to search for the presence of a target that was presented with equal probability among the old and the new elements (Experiments 1 and 2) or twice as often among the old elements than among the new elements (Experiment 3). The results show that new elements were prioritized for selection over old ones even though the observers had no incentive to do so. The results suggest that prioritized selection of new over old elements is not mediated by a top-down inhibition process, as was proposed by Watson and Humphreys (1997). Instead, prioritization of new elements appears to be a bottom-up process. The implications of these results are discussed in terms of models of attentional control.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allport, D.A. (1987). Selection for action: Some behavioral and neurophysiological considerations of attention and action. In H. Heuer & A. F. Sanders (Eds.),Perspectives on perception and action (pp. 395–419). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Broadbent, D. E. (1958).Perception and communication. New York: Pergamon.
Cave, K. R., &Wolfe, J. M. (1990). Modeling the role of parallel processing in visual search.Cognitive Psychology,22, 225–271.
Donk, M., &Theeuwes, J. (2001). Visual marking beside the mark: Prioritizing selection by abrupt onsets.Perception & Psychophysics,63, 891–900.
Folk, C. L., Remington, R.W., &Johnston, J. C. (1992). Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,18, 1030–1044.
Gibson, B. S., &Peterson, M. A. (2001). Inattentional blindness and attentional capture: Evidence for attention-based theories of visual salience. In C. L. Folk & B. S. Gibson (Eds.),Attraction, distraction and action: Multiple perspectives on attentional capture (pp. 51–76). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Humphreys, G. W., Watson, D. G., &Jolicoeur, P. (2002). Fractionating the preview benefit in search: Dual-task decomposition of visual marking by timing and modality.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,28, 640–660.
Ives, H. E. (1912). Studies of the photometry of different colours: I. Spectral luminosity curves obtained by equality of brightness photometer and the flicker photometer under similar conditions.Philosophical Magazine,24, 149–188.
Jiang, Y., Chun, M. M., &Marks, L. E. (2002). Visual marking: Selective attention to asynchronous temporal groups.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,28, 717–730.
Jonides, J., &Yantis, S. (1988). Uniqueness of abrupt visual onset in capturing attention.Perception & Psychophysics,43, 346–354.
Joseph, J. S., Chun, M. M., &Nakayama, K. (1997). Attentional requirements in a “preattentive” feature search task.Nature,387, 805–807.
Olivers, C. N. L., &Humphreys, G.W. (2002). When visual marking meets the attentional blink: More evidence for top-down, limitedcapacity inhibition.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,28, 22–42.
Olivers, C. N. L., Humphreys, G.W., Heinke, D., &Cooper, A. C.G. (2002). Prioritization in visual search: Visual marking is not dependent on a mnemonic search.Perception & Psychophysics,64, 540–560.
Spence, C., &Driver, J. (1997). Audiovisual links in exogenous covert spatial orienting.Perception & Psychophysics,59, 1–22.
Theeuwes, J. (1990). Perceptual selectivity is task-dependent: Evidence from selective search.Acta Psychologica,74, 81–99.
Theeuwes, J. (1991). Exogenous and endogenous control of attention: The effect of visual onsets and offsets.Perception & Psychophysics,49, 83–90.
Theeuwes, J. (1994). Stimulus-driven capture and attentional set: Selective search for color and visual abrupt onsets.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,20, 799–806.
Theeuwes, J., Kramer, A. F., &Atchley, P. (1998). Visual marking of old objects.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,5, 130–134.
Watson, D. G., &Humphreys, G. W. (1997). Visual marking: Prioritizing selection for new objects by top-down attentional inhibition of old objects.Psychological Review,104, 90–122.
Watson, D. G., &Humphreys, G. W. (2000). Visual marking: Evidence for inhibition using a probe-dot detection paradigm.Perception & Psychophysics,62, 471–481.
Wolfe, J. M., Cave, K. R., &Franzel, S. L. (1989). Guided Search: An alternative to the feature integration model for visual search.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,15, 419–433.
Yantis, S., &Egeth, H. E. (1999). On the distinction between visual salience and stimulus-driven attentional capture.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,25, 661–676.
Yantis, S., &Hillstrom, A. P. (1994). Stimulus-driven attentional capture: Evidence from equiluminant visual objects.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,20, 95–107.
Yantis, S., &Johnson, D.N. (1990). Mechanisms of attentional priority.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,16, 812–825.
Yantis, S., &Jones, E. (1991). Mechanisms of attentional selection: Temporally modulated priority tags.Perception & Psychophysics,50, 166–178.
Yantis, S., &Jonides, J. (1984). Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: Evidence from visual search.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,10, 601–621.
Yantis, S., &Jonides, J. (1990). Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: Voluntary versus automatic allocation.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,16, 121–134.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Donk, M., Theeuwes, J. Prioritizing selection of new elements: Bottom-up versus top-down control. Perception & Psychophysics 65, 1231–1242 (2003). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194848
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194848