Abstract
Contextual cuing is a memory-based phenomenon in which previously encountered global pattern information in a display can automatically guide attention to the location of a target (Chun& Jiang, 1998), leading to rapid and accurate responses. What is not clear is how contextual cuing works. By monitoring eye movements, we investigated the roles that recognition and guidance play in contextual cuing. Recognition does not appear to occur on every trial and sometimes does not have its effects until later in the search process. When recognition does occur, attention is guided straight to the target rather than in the general direction. In Experiment 2, we investigated the interaction between memorydriven search (contextual cuing) and stimulus-driven attentional capture by abrupt onsets. Contextual cuing was able to override capture by abrupt onsets. In contrast, onsets had almost no effect on the degree of contextual cuing. These data are discussed in terms of the role of top-down and bottom-up factors in the guidance of attention in visual search.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Chun, M. M.,&Jiang, Y. (1998).Contextual cueing: Implicit learning and memory of visual context guides spatial attention.Cognitive Psychology,36, 28–71.
Chun, M. M.,&Jiang, Y. (1999). Top-down attentional guidance based on implicit learning of visual covariation.Psychological Science,10, 360–365.
Deubel, H.,&Schneider, W. X. (1996). Saccade target selection and object recognition: Evidence for a common attentional mechanism.Visual Research,36, 1827–1837.
Folk, C. L.,&Remington, R. [W.] (1998). Selectivity in distraction by irrelevant featural singletons: Evidence for two forms of attentional capture.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception& Performance,24, 847–858.
Folk, C. L.,&Remington, R. [W.] (1999). Can new objects override attentional control settings?Perception& Psychophysics,61, 727–739.
Folk, C. L, Remington, R. W.,&Johnston, J. C. (1992). Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception& Performance,18, 1030–1044.
Hoffman, J. E.,&Subramaniam, B. (1995). The role of visual attention in saccadic eye movements.Perception& Psychophysics,57, 787–795.
Irwin, D. E., Colcombe, A. M., Kramer, A. F.,&Hahn, S. (2000). Attentional and oculomotor capture by onset, luminance, and color singletons.Vision Research,40, 1443–1458
Kramer, A. F., Hahn, S., Irwin, D. E.,&Theeuwes, J. (1999). Attentional capture and aging: Implications for visual search performance and oculomotor control.Psychology& Aging,14, 135–154.
Kramer, A. F., Hahn, S., Irwin, D. E.,&Theeuwes, J. (2000). Age differences in the control of looking behavior: Do you know where your eyes have been?Psychological Science,11, 210–217.
Logan, G. D. (1988). Towards an instance based theory of automatization.Psychological Review,95, 492–527.
Logan, G. D. (1998). What is learned during automatization? II. Obligatory encoding of spatial location.Journal of Experiment Psychology: Human Perception& Performance,24, 1720–1736.
Logan, G. D.,Taylor, S. E.,&Etherton, J. L. (1999). Attention and automaticity: Toward a theoretical integration.Psychological Research,62, 165–181.
Martin-Emerson, R.,&Kramer, A. F. (1997). Offset transients modulate attentional capture by sudden onsets.Perception& Psychophysics,59, 739–751.
Miller, J. (1989). The control of attention by abrupt visual onsets and offsets.Perception& Psychophysics,45, 567–571.
Theeuwes, J., Kramer, A. F., Hahn, S.,&Irwin, D. E. (1998). Our eyes do not always go where we want them to go: Capture of the eyes by new objects.Psychological Science,9, 379–385.
Theeuwes, J., Kramer, A. F., Hahn, S., Irwin, D. E.,&Zelinsky, G. J. (1999). Influence of attentional capture on eye movement control.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception& Performance,25, 1595–1608.
Wolfe, J. M., Cave, K. R.,&Franzel, S. L. (1989). Guided search: An alternative to the feature integration model for visual search.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception& Performance,15, 419–433.
Yantis, S.,&Egeth, H. (1999). On the distinction between visual salience and stimulus-driven attentional capture.Journal of Experiment Psychology: Human Perception& Performance,25, 661–676.
Yantis, S.,&Jonides, J. (1984). Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: Evidence from visual search.Journal of Experiment Psychology: Human Perception& Performance,10, 601–621.
Yantis, S.,&Jonides, J. (1990). Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: Voluntary versus automatic allocation.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception& Performance,16, 121–134.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Additional information
This research was supported by Grant AG14966 from the National Institute on Aging and a cooperative research agreement with the Army Research Laboratory (DAAL01-96-2-0003).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Peterson, M.S., Kramer, A.F. Attentional guidance of the eyes by contextual information and abrupt onsets.. Perception & Psychophysics 63, 1239–1249 (2001). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194537
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194537