Abstract
Current theories of arrival time have difficulty explaining performance in the common but neglected case of nonlinear approach. Global tau, a variable supposed to guide time-to-passage (TTP) judgments of objects approaching on linear trajectories, does not apply to circular movement. However, TTP judgments are surprisingly accurate in such cases. We simulated movement through a three-dimensional cloud of point-lights on various circular trajectories. Arrival-time judgments were found to be above chance when observers had to determine which of two expansionless targets would pass them first. Similar to the inside bias observed in heading studies on circular trajectories, observers showed a strong bias to select the target on the inside of their own curved motion path as passing by first. Analysis of the projected target motion revealed that targets on the inside had lower optical velocities and relatively high optical acceleration rates. Empirical TTP judgments agreed best with a strategy based on relative optical velocity changes.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Berthelon, C., &Mestre D. (1993). Curvilinear approach to an intersection and visual detection of collision.Human Factors,35, 521–534.
Bootsma, R. J., &Oudejans, R. R. (1993). Visual information about time-to-collision between two objects.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,19, 1041–1052.
Bootsma, R. J., &van Wieringen, P. C. W. (1990). Timing an attacking forehand in table tennis.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,16, 21–29.
Cutting, J. E. (1986). Perception with an eye for motion. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
DeLucia, P. R. (1991). Pictorial and motion-based information for depth perception.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,17, 738–748.
DeLucia, P. R., &Liddell, G. W. (1998). Cognitive motion extrapolation and cognitive clocking in prediction motion tasks.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,24, 901–914.
DeLucia, P. R., &Novak, J. B. (1997). Judgments of relative time-tocontact of more than two approaching objects: Toward a method.Perception & Psychophysics,59, 913–928.
DeLucia, P. R., &Warren, R. (1994). Pictorial and motion-based information during active control of self-motion: Size-arrival effects on collision avoidance.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,20, 783–798.
Dyre, B. P., &Andersen, G. J. (1997). Image velocity magnitudes and perception of heading.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,23, 546–565.
Gibson, J. J. (1966).The senses considered as perceptual system. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Heuer, H. (1993). Estimates of time to contact based on changing size and changing target vergence.Perception,22, 549–563.
Hoyle, F. (1957).The black cloud. London: Heineman.
Kaiser, M. K., &Hecht, H. (1995). Time-to-passage judgments in nonconstant optical flow fields.Perception & Psychophysics,57, 817–825.
Kaiser, M. K., &Mowafy, L. (1993). Optical specification of time-topassage: Observers’ sensitivity to global tau.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,19, 1028–1040.
Kerzel, D., &Hecht, H. (1997). Heading backward: Perceived direction of movement in contracting and expanding optical flow fields.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,4, 516–523.
Kerzel, D., Hecht, H., &Kim, N.-G. (1999). Image velocity, not tau, explains arrival time judgments from global optical flow.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,25, 1–16.
Kim, N.-G., &Turvey, M. T. (1998). Visually perceiving heading on circular and elliptical paths.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,24, 1690–1704.
Law, D. J., Pellegrino, J. W., Mitchell, S. R., Fischer, S. C., Mc-Donald, T. P., &Hunt, E. B. (1993). Perceptual and cognitive factors governing performance in comparative arrival-time judgments.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,19, 1183–1199.
Lee, D. N. (1976). A theory of visual control of braking based on information about time-to-collision.Perception,5, 437–459.
Lee, D. N., Young, D. S., &Rewt, D. (1992). How do somersaulters land on their feet?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,18, 1195–1202.
Macmillan, N. A., &Creelman, C. D. (1991).Detection theory: A user’s guide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Schiff, W., &Detwiler, M. L. (1979). Information used in judging impending collision.Perception,8, 647–658.
Schiff, W., &Oldak, R. (1990). Accuracy of judging time to arrival: Effects of modality, trajectory, and gender.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,16, 303–316.
Simpson, W. A. (1988). Depth discrimination from optic flow.Perception,17, 497–512.
Stone, L. S., &Perrone, J. A. (1997). Human heading estimation during visually simulated curvilinear motion.Vision Research,37, 573–590.
Todd, J. T. (1981). Visual information about moving objects.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,7, 795–810.
Tresilian, J. R. (1991). Empirical and theoretical issues in the perception of time to contact.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,17, 865–876.
Tresilian, J. R. (1995). Perceptual and cognitive processes in time-tocontact estimation: Analysis of prediction-motion and relative judgment tasks.Perception & Psychophysics,57, 231–245.
Wann, J. P. (1996). Anticipating arrival: Is the tau margin a specious theory?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,22, 1031–1048.
Warren, W. H., Mestre, D. R., Blackwell, A. W., &Morris, M. W. (1991). Perception of circular heading from optical flow.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,17, 28–43.
Warren, W. H., Morris, M. W., &Kalish, M. (1988). Perception of translational heading from optical flow.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,14, 646–660.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This work was supported by fellowships from the Studienstiftung des Deutschen Volkes and the Fulbright Commission to the first author.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kerzel, D., Hecht, H. & Kim, NG. Time-to-passage judgments on circular trajectories are based on relative optical acceleration. Perception & Psychophysics 63, 1153–1170 (2001). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194531
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194531