Abstract
Previous studies have shown that working memory (WM) plays an important role in selective attention, so that high WM load leads to inefficient distractor inhibition, in comparison with low WM load. In the present study, we examined the effect of WM on distractor processing while the extent of attentional focus was held constant. Our results show that WM load affected distractor processing only when it was positively correlated with the extent of attentional focus. When the latter was held constant, the effect of WM became negligible. Furthermore, when low WM load was paired with a wide attentional focus and high WM load was matched with a narrow attentional focus, greater distractor processing was found when the WM load was low than when it was high. These results suggest that efficient distractor inhibition may require only minimal WM resources and that the effect of WM on distractor processing is more complex than has previously been assumed.
Article PDF
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Chen, Z. (2000). An object-based cost of visual filtering.Perception & Psychophysics,62, 482–495.
Chen, Z. (2003). Attention focus, processing load, and Stroop interference.Perception & Psychophysics,65, 888–900.
Cowan, N. (2001). The magical number 4 in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity.Behavioral & Brain Sciences,24, 87–114.
de Fockert, J. W., Rees, G., Frith, C. D., &Lavie, N. (2001). The role of working memory in visual selective attention.Science,291, 1803–1806.
Eriksen, B. A., &Eriksen, C. W. (1974). Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task.Perception & Psychophysics,16, 143–149.
Eriksen, C. W., &St. James, J. D. (1986). Visual attention within and around the field of focal attention: A zoom lens model.Perception & Psychophysics,40, 225–240.
Joseph, J. S., Chun, M. M., &Nakayama, K. (1997). Attentional requirements in a ‘preattentive’ feature search task.Nature,387, 805–807.
Kane, M. J., &Engle, R. W. (2003). Working-memory capacity and the control of attention: The contributions of goal neglect, response competition, and task set to Stroop interference.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,132, 47–70.
Kramer, A. F., &Jacobson, A. (1991). Perceptual organization and focused attention: The role of objects and proximity in visual processing.Perception & Psychophysics,50, 267–284.
LaBerge, D., Brown, V., Carter, M., Bash, D., &Hartley, A. (1991). Reducing the effects of adjacent distractors by narrowing attention.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,17, 65–76.
Lavie, N. (1995). Perceptual load as a necessary condition for selective attention.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,21, 451–468.
Lavie, N. (2005). Distracted and confused? Selective attention under load.Trends in Cognitive Sciences,9, 75–82.
Lavie, N., &de Fockert, J. [W.] (2005). The role of working memory in attentional capture.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,12, 669–674.
Lavie, N., Hirst, A., de Fockert, J. W., &Viding, E. (2004). Load theory of selective attention and cognitive control.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,133, 339–354.
Logan, G. D. (1978). Attention in character-classification tasks: Evidence for the automaticity of component stages.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,107, 32–63.
Unsworth, N., Schrock, J. C., &Engle, R. W. (2004). Working memory capacity and the antisaccade task: Individual differences in voluntary saccade control.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,30, 1302–1321.
Woodman, G. F., &Luck, S. J. (2004). Visual search is slowed when visuospatial working memory is occupied.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,11, 269–274.
Woodman, G. F., Vogel, E. K., &Luck, S. J. (2001). Visual search remains efficient when visual working memory is full.Psychological Science,12, 219–224.
Yantis, S., &Jonides, J. (1984). Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: Evidence from visual search.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,10, 601–621.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This research was supported by Grant U6498 from the University of Canterbury to Z.C. Accepted by David A. Balota’s editorial team. Note/3-Accepted by David A. Balota’s editorial team.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chen, Z., Chan, C.C. Distractor interference stays constant despite variation in working memory load. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 14, 306–312 (2007). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194069
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194069