Abstract
Auclair and Siéroff (2002) examined lateralized cuing effects in the identification of centrally presented letter strings and reported no cuing effects for short word stimuli. They argued for a redistribution of attention over the entire word for short familiar words. We explored cuing effects with Chinese phonetic compounds, which can be considered extreme examples of short words, in a character-level semantic judgment task. When the semantic radical position was placed on the left of the characters, strong radical combinability and semantic transparency effects were observed. There was also a significant interaction between cue position (left vs. right) and radical combinability: A left cue facilitated semantic judgment of characters with small radical combinability more than did a right cue. This behavior reflects the information profile of Chinese phonetic compounds. Semantic radicals with small combinability are more informative than those with large combinability in determining the meaning of the whole character; they therefore benefit more from a left than a right cue. A mechanism redistributing attention over the whole of the character was not in evidence at the level of semantic processing.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Auclair, L., &Siéroff, E. (2002). Attentional cueing effect in the identification of words and pseudowords of different length.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,55A, 445–463.
Besner, D., Stolz, J. A., &Boutilier, C. (1997). The Stroop effect and the myth of automaticity.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,4, 221–225.
Brunn, J. L., &Farah, M. J. (1991). The relation between spatial attention and reading: Evidence from the neglect syndrome.Cognitive Neuropsychology,8, 59–75.
Brysbaert, M. (1994). Interhemispheric transfer and the processing of foveally presented stimuli.Behavioural Brain Research,64, 151–161.
Chen, M. J., &Weekes, B. S. (2004). Effects of semantic radicals on Chinese character categorization and character decision.Chinese Journal of Psychology,46, 181–196.
Feldman, L. B., &Siok, W. W. T. (1999). Semantic radicals in phonetic compounds: Implications for visual character recognition in Chinese. In J. Wang, A. W. Inhoff, & H.-C. Chen (Eds.),Reading Chinese script: A cognitive analysis (pp. 19–35). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Harbaugh, R. (1996). Chinese characters and culture. Retrieved Aug. 25, 2004, from www.zhongwen.com.
Hsiao, J. H., &Shillcock, R. (2006). Analysis of a Chinese phonetic compound database: Implications for orthographic processing.Journal of Psycholinguistic Research,35, 405–426.
Huang, S. K. (1995). Frequency counts of BIG-5 Chinese characters appeared on Usenet newsgroups during 1993–1994. Retrieved March 16, 2004, from www.geocities.com/hao510/charfreq/.
Jordan, T. R., Patching, G. R., &Milner, A. D. (1998). Central fixations are inadequately controlled by instructions alone: Implications for studying cerebral asymmetry.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,51A, 371–391. orMandarin Promotion Council, Ministry of Education, R.O.C. (2000).Dictionary of Chinese character variants. Retrieved Sept. 25, 2004, from http://140.111.1.40/
Mohr, B., Pulvermüller, F., &Zaidel, E. (1994). Lexical decision after left, right, and bilateral presentation of function words, content words and non-words: Evidence for interhemispheric interaction.Neuropsychologia,32, 105–124.
Oldfield, R. C. (1971). The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory.Neuropsychologia,9, 97–113.
Perfetti, C. A., &Tan L. H. (1998). The time course of graphic, phonological, and semantic activation in Chinese character identification.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,24, 101–118.
Perfetti, C. A., &Tan, L. H. (1999). The constituency model of Chinese word identification. In J. Wang, A. W. Inhoff, & H.-C. Chen (Eds.),Reading Chinese script: A cognitive analysis (pp. 115–134). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Posner, M. I. (1980). Orienting of attention.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,32, 3–25.
Shen, D., &Forster, K. I. (1999). Masked phonological priming in reading Chinese words depends on the task.Language & Cognitive Processes,14, 429–459.
Stolz, J. A., &McCann, R. S. (2000). Visual word recognition: Reattending to the role of spatial attention.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,26, 1320–1331.
Taft, M., &Zhu, X. (1997). Submorphemic processing in reading Chinese.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,23, 761–775.
Tan, L. H., &Perfetti, C. A. (1998). Phonological codes as early sources of constraint in Chinese word identification: A review of current discoveries and theoretical accounts.Reading & Writing,10, 165–220.
Tzeng, O. J. L., &Hung, D. L. (1978). Reading the Chinese character: Some basic research.Acta Psychologica Taiwanica,20, 45–49.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hui-Wen Hsiao, J., Shillcock, R. & Lavidor, M. An examination of semantic radical combinability effects with lateralized cues in Chinese character recognition. Perception & Psychophysics 69, 338–344 (2007). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193754
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193754