Abstract
In three experiments, we investigated the effects of word concreteness and encoding instructions on context-dependent discrimination in verbal contexts, using Murnane, Phelps, and Malmberg’s (1999) ICE (item, context, ensemble) theory as the framework. Word concreteness was manipulated within participants, and encoding was manipulated between participants. It was hypothesized that the magnitude of context-dependent discrimination would be affected by both concreteness and encoding instructions. Imagery instructions resulted in context-dependent discrimination for both concrete and abstract word pairs across all the experiments. Context-dependent discrimination was observed under rote instructions for concrete and abstract words, particularly when the same context word was paired multiple times with the targets. The results indicated that context-dependent discrimination is not dependent solely on the use of interactive imagery instructions or on word concreteness.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baddeley, A. D. (1982). Domains of recollection.Psychological Review,89, 708–729.
Bayen, U. J., Phelps, M. P., &Spaniol, J. (2000). Age-related differences in the use of contextual information in recognition memory: A global matching approach.Journals of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences & Social Sciences,55B, P131-P141.
Bjork, R. A., &Richardson-Klavehn, A. (1989). On the puzzling relationship between environmental context and human memory. In C. Izawa (Ed.),Current issues in cognitive processes: The Tulane Flowerree Symposium on Cognition (pp. 313–344). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Bradley, M. M., &Glenberg, A. M. (1983). Strengthening associations: Duration, attention, or relations?Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,22, 650–666.
Bugelski, B. R. (1970). Words and things and images.American Psychologist,25, 1002–1012.
Craik, F. I. M., Govoni, R., Naveh-Benjamin, M., &Anderson, N. D. (1996). The effects of divided attention on encoding and retrieval processes in human memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,125, 159–180.
Craik, F. I. M., Naveh-Benjamin, M., Ishaik, G., &Anderson, N. D. (2000). Divided attention during encoding and retrieval: Differential control effects?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,26, 1744–1749.
Craik, F. I. M., &Tulving, E. (1975). Depth of processing and the retention of words in episodic memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,104, 268–294.
Dalton, P. (1993). The role of stimulus familiarity in context-dependent recognition.Memory & Cognition,21, 223–234.
Dobbins, I. G., Kroll, N. E. A., &Yonelinas, A. P. (2004). Dissociating familiarity from recollection using rote rehearsal.Memory & Cognition,32, 932–944.
Eich, E. (1985). Context, memory, and integrated item/context imagery.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,11, 764–770.
Friendly, M., Franklin, P. E., Hoffman, D., &Rubin, D. C. (1982). The Toronto Word Pool: Norms for imagery, concreteness, orthographic variables, and grammatical usage for 1,080 words.Behavior Research Methods & Instrumentation,14, 375–399.
Glanzer, M., &Adams, J. K. (1990). The mirror effect in recognition memory: Data and theory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,16, 5–16.
Glanzer, M., Adams, J. K., Iverson, G. J., &Kim, K. (1993). The regularities of recognition memory.Psychological Review,100, 546–567.
Godden, D. R., &Baddeley, A. D. (1975). Context-dependent memory in two natural environments: On land and underwater.British Journal of Psychology,66, 325–331.
Groninger, L. D., &Groninger, L. K. (1982). Function of images in the encoding-retrieval process.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,8, 353–358.
Hintzman, D. L. (1988). Judgments of frequency and recognition memory in multiple-trace memory model.Psychological Review,95, 528–551.
Humphreys, M. S. (1976). Relational information and the context effect in recognition memory.Memory & Cognition,4, 221–232.
Light, L. L., &Carter-Sobell, L. (1970). Effects of changed semantic context on recognition memory.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,9, 1–11.
Murnane, K., &Phelps, M. P. (1993). A global activation approach to the effect of changes in environmental context on recognition.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,19, 882–894.
Murnane, K., &Phelps, M. P. (1994). When does a different environmental context make a difference in recognition?A global activation model. Memory & Cognition,22, 584–590.
Murnane, K., &Phelps, M. P. (1995). Effects of changes in relative cue strength on context-dependent recognition.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,21, 158–172.
Murnane, K., Phelps, M. P., &Malmberg, K. (1999). Context-dependent recognition memory: The ICE theory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,128, 403–415.
Nairne, J. S. (1983). Associative processing during rote rehearsal.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,9, 3–20.
Richardson, J. T. E. (1998). The availability and effectiveness of reported mediators in associative learning: A historical review and an experimental investigation.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,5, 597–614.
Rutherford, A. (2004). Environmental context-dependent recognition memory effects: An examination of ICE model and cue-overload hypotheses.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,57A, 107–127.
Shiffrin, R. M., &Steyvers, M. (1997). A model for recognition memory: REM—retrieving effectively from memory.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,4, 145–166.
Smith, S. M. (1988). Environmental context-dependent memory. In G. M. Davies & D. M. Thomson (Eds.),Memory in context: Context in memory (pp. 13–34). Chichester, U.K.: Wiley.
Smith, S. M., Glenberg, A., &Bjork, R. A. (1978). Environmental context and human memory.Memory & Cognition,6, 342–353.
Smith, S. M., &Vela, E. (2001). Environmental context-dependent memory: A review and meta-analysis.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,8, 203–220.
Tulving, E., &Thomson, D. M. (1973). Encoding specificity and retrieval processes in episodic memory.Psychological Review,80, 353–370.
Watkins, O. C., &Watkins, M. J. (1975). Buildup of proactive inhibition as a cue-overload effect.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory,104, 442–452.
Wickens, D. D. (1987). The dual meanings of context: Implications for research, theory, and applications. In D. S. Gorfein & R. R. Hoffman (Eds.),Memory and learning: The Ebbinghaus Centennial Conference (pp. 135–152). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Additional information
This research was supported by funds provided by the Department of Psychology, University of Maryland.
Note—This article was accepted by the previous editorial team, when Colin M. MacLeod was Editor.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Franco-Watkins, A.M., Dougherty, M.R. Word concreteness and encoding effects on context-dependent discrimination. Memory & Cognition 34, 973–985 (2006). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193245
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193245