Abstract
In psychological experiments involving facial stimuli, it is of great importance that the basic perceptual or psychological characteristics that are investigated are not confounded by factors such as brightness and contrast, head size, hair cut and color, skin color, and the presence of glasses and earrings. Standardization of facial stimulus materials reduces the effect of these confounding factors. We therefore employed a set of basic image processing techniques to deal with this issue. The processed images depict the faces in gray-scale, all at the same size, brightness, and contrast, and confined to an oval mask revealing only the basic features such as the eyes, nose, and mouth. The standardization was successfully applied to four different face databases, consisting of male and female faces and including neutral as well as happy facial expressions. An important advantage of the proposed standardization is that featural as well as configurational information is retained. We also consider the procedure to be a major contribution to the development of a de facto standard for the use of facial stimuli in psychological experiments. Such methodological standardization would allow a better comparison of the results of these studies.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
ba]Aylward, E. H., Park, J. E., Field, K. M., Parsons, A. C., Richards, T. L., Cramer, S. C., et al. (2005). Brain activation during face perception: Evidence of a developmental change. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17, 308–319.
Barton, J. J. S., Keenan, J. P., & Bass, T. (2001). Discrimination of spatial relations and features in faces: Effects of inversion and viewing duration. British Journal of Psychology, 92, 527–549.
Bokde, A. L., Dong, W., Born, C., Leinsinger, G., Meindl, T., Teipel, S. J., et al. (2005). Task difficulty in a simultaneous face matching task modulates activity in face fusiform area. Cognitive Brain Research, 25, 701–710.
Bruce, V., Doyle, T., Dench, N., & Burton, M. (1991). Remembering facial configurations. Cognition, 38, 109–144.
Buchala, S., Davey, N., Frank, R. J., Loomes, M., & Gale, T. M. (2005). The role of global and feature based information in gender classification of faces: A comparison of human performance and computational models. International Journal of Neural Systems, 15, 121–128.
Dalal, A. B., & Phadke, S. R. (2007). Morphometric analysis of face in dysmorphology. Computer Methods & Programs in Biomedicine, 85, 165–172.
Dubois, S., Rossion, B., Schiltz, C., Bodart, J. M., Michel, C., Bruyer, R., et al. (1999). Effect of familiarity on the processing of human faces. NeuroImage, 9, 278–289.
Gonzalez, R. C., & Woods, R. E. (1992). Digital image processing. New York: Addison-Wesley.
Haralick, R. M., Sternberg, S. R., & Zhuang, X. (1987). Image analysis using mathematical morphology. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis & Machine Intelligence, 9, 532–550.
Kanwisher, N., McDermott, J., & Chun, M. M. (1997). The fusiform face area: A module in human extrastriate cortex specialized for face perception. Journal of Neuroscience, 17, 4302–4311.
Leinsinger, G., Born, C., Meindl, T., Bokde, A. L., Britsch, S., Lopez-Bayo, P., et al. (2007). Age-dependent differences in human brain activity using a face- and location-matching task: An FMRI study. Dementia & Geriatric Cognitive Disorders, 24, 235–246.
Messer, K., Matas, J., Kittles, J., Luettin, J., & Maitre, G. (1999). XM2VTSDB: The extended M2VTS database. In Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Audio- and Video-Based Biometric Person Authentication (AVBPA99) (pp. 72–77). Berlin: Springer.
Rakover, S. S. (2002). Featural vs. configurational information in faces: A conceptual and empirical analysis. British Journal of Psychology, 93, 1–30.
Surguladze, S., Russell, T., Kucharska-Pietura, K., Travis, M. J., Giampietro, V., David, A. S., et al. (2006). A reversal of the normal pattern of parahippocampal response to neutral and fearful faces is associated with reality distortion in schizophrenia. Biological Psychiatry, 60, 423–431.
Tanaka, J. W., & Farah, M. J. (1993). Parts and wholes in face recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 46A, 225–245.
Tong, F., Nakayama, K., Moscovitch, M., Weinrib, O., & Kanwisher, N. (2000). Response properties of the human fusiform face area. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 17, 257–279.
White, M., & Li, J. (2006). Matching faces and expressions in pixelated and blurred photos. American Journal of Psychology, 119, 21–28.
Yin, R. K. (1969). Looking at upside-down faces. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 81, 141–145.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gronenschild, E.H.B.M., Smeets, F., Vuurman, E.F.P.M. et al. The use of faces as stimuli in neuroimaging and psychological experiments: A procedure to standardize stimulus features. Behavior Research Methods 41, 1053–1060 (2009). https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.1053
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.1053