Abstract
The effect of a perceptual set on creativity was tested. Subjects in 16 groups (N = 348) were exposed to one of four pretest conditions. One group received practice on the physiognomic perception test, previously shown to be one of the most successful correlates of creativity; another group was exposed to one of the least successful perceptual measures, figure-ground; and in two control conditions, subjects received either a verbal or no pretest. The effects of these pretests were measured by four unusual uses tests of creativity. These measure the number of ideas generated (fluidity) and their unusualness (divergent thinking). None of the pretests, including the perceptual tasks, affected any of the creativity scores. The implications of these null findings, including future directions for research, are discussed.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bergum, B. o., & Bergum, J. E. (1979). Creativity, perceptual stability, and self-perception. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 14, 61–63.
Bergum, J. E., & Bergum, B. O. (1979). Self-perceived creativity and ambiguous figure reversal rate. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 14, 373–374.
Bergum, B. O., & Falum, L. E. (1975). Perceptual stability, image size, binocularity and creativity. Perceptual & Motor Skills, 41, 667–671.
Bilotta, J., Guare, J., & Lndauer, M. S. (1981). The relationship between field-independence/dependence, creativity, and physiognomy among men and women. JSAS: Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 11 (No. 2287).
Bloomberg, M. (1971). Creativity as related to field independence and mobility. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 118, 3–12.
Educational Testing Service. (1962). Hidden figures test-V. Atlanta, GA: Author.
Getzels, J. p., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1975). From problem solving to problem finding. In I. A. Taylor & J. W. Getzels (Eds.), Perspectives in creativity (pp. 90-116). Chicago: Aldine.
Ghiselin, B. (Ed.). (1955). The creative process. New York: Mentor.
Goodenough, D. R. (1976). The role of individual differences in field dependence as a factor in learning and memory. Psychological Bulletin, 83, 675–694.
Guilford, J. P. (1975). Creativity: A quarter century of progress. In I A. Taylor & J. W. Getzels (Eds.), Perspectives in creativity (pp. 37–59). Chicago: Aldine.
Jackson, D. N., Messick, R., & Myers, C. T. (1964). Evaluations of group and individual forms of embedded-figures measures of field- independence. Educational & Psychological Measurement, 177, 192.
Lindauer, M. S. (1973). The extent of illusory effects for 32 illusions. Perceptual & Motor Skills, 36, 887–894.
Lindauer, M. S. (in press). The relationship between tests of creativity and perception. ERIC Document Reproduction Service.
Lindauer, M. S., & Baust, R. F. (1974). Comparisons between 25 reversible and ambiguous figures on measures of latency, duration, and fluctuation. Behavior Research Methods & Instrumentation, 6, 1–9.
Mednick, S. a. (1962). The associative basis of the creative process. Psychological Review, 69, 220–232.
Mednick, S. A., & Mednick, R. S. (1967). Remote associates test. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Morris, T. L., & Bergum, B. O. (1978). A note on the relationship between field-independence and creativity. Perceptual & Motor Skills, 46, 1114.
Osborn, A. F. (1953). Applied imagination. New York: Scribner.
Schachtell, S. (1959). Metamorphosis. New York: Basic Books.
Simpson, M. T., Lansky, L. M., Lester, R. J., & Paterson, J. M. (1983). Figure reversals and creativity: A research note. Perceptual & Motor Skills, 57, 582.
Spotts, J. v., & Mackler, B. (1967). Relationship of field-dependent and field-independent cognitive styles to creative test performance. Perceptual & Motor Skills, 24 (Monograph Supplement 2-V24), 239-268.
Stein, M. I. (1974). Stimulating creativity (Vols. 1-2). New York: Academic Press.
Stein, M. I. (1975). The physiognomic cue test: Manual. New York: Behavioral Publications.
Street, R. F. (1931). A gestalt completion test. New York: Teachers College Press, Columbia University.
Tumin, M. (1954). Obstacles to creativity. ETC, 11, 261–271.
Wallas, R. (1926). The art of thought. New York: Harcourt Brace.
Wertheimer, M. (1945). Productive thinking. New York: Harper.
Witkin, H. A., Lewis, H. B., Hertzman, M., Machover, K., Meissner, P., & Wapner, S. (1954). Personality through perception. New York: Harper.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lindauer, M.S. A failure to find an effect of perceptual set on creativity. Bull. Psychon. Soc. 28, 33–36 (1990). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03337641
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03337641