Abstract
In two experiments, we examined the extent to which knowledge of sequential dependencies and/or patterns of repeating elements is used during transfer in artificial grammar learning. According to one view of transfer, learners abstract the grammar’s sequential dependencies and then learn a mapping to new vocabulary at test (Dienes, Altmann, & Gao, 1999). Elements that are repeated have no special status on this view, and so a logical prediction is that learners should transfer as well after exposure to a grammar without repetitions as after exposure to a grammar with them. On another view, repetition structure is the very basis of transfer (Brooks & Vokey, 1991; Mathews & Roussel, 1997). Learners were trained on grammars with or without repeating elements to test these competing views. Learners demonstrated considerable knowledge of sequential dependencies in their training vocabulary but did not use such knowledge to transfer to a new vocabulary. Transfer only occurred in the presence of repetition structure, demonstrating this to be the basis of transfer.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abrams, M., &Reber, A. S. (1988). Implicit learning: Robustness in the face of psychiatric disorders.Journal of Psycholinguistic Research,17, 425–439.
Allen, R., &Reber, A. S. (1980). Very long term memory for tacit knowledge.Cognition,8, 175–185.
Altmann, G. T. M., Dienes, Z., &Goode, A. (1995). Modality independence of implicitly learned grammatical knowledge.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,21, 899–912.
Brooks, L. R., &Vokey, J. R. (1991). Abstract analogies and abstracted grammars: Comments on Reber (1989) and Mathews et al. (1989).Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,120, 316–323.
Cleeremans, A. (1997). Principles for implicit learning. In D. C. Berry (Ed.),How implicit is implicit learning? (pp. 195–234). New York: Oxford University Press.
Dienes, Z., &Altmann, G. A. (1997). Transfer of implicit knowledge across domains: How implicit and how abstract? In D. C. Berry (Ed.),How implicit is implicit learning? (pp. 107–123). New York: Oxford University Press.
Dienes, Z., Altmann, G. T. M., &Gao, S.-J. (1999). Mapping across domains without feedback: A neural network model of transfer of implicit knowledge.Cognitive Science,23, 53–82.
Dienes, Z., Broadbent, D., &Berry, D. (1991). Implicit and explicit knowledge bases in artificial grammar learning.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,17, 875–887.
Elman, J. L. (1990). Finding structure in time.Cognitive Science,14, 179–211.
Gomez, R. L. (1997). Transfer and complexity in artificial grammar learning.Cognitive Psychology,33, 154–207.
Gomez, R. L., & Gerken, L. A. (1996, November).Artificial grammar learning in one-year-olds: Evidence for generalization to new structure. Paper presented at the 21st Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development.
Gomez, R. L., & Gerken, L. A. (1997, November).Abstraction in infant artificial grammar learning. Paper presented at the 22nd Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development.
Gomez, R. L., & Gerken, L. A. (1998, April).The basis of abstraction in infant artificial grammar learning. Poster presented at the 13th Biennial International Conference on Infant Studies, Atlanta.
Gomez, R. L., &Gerken, L. A. (1999). Artificial grammar learning by one-year-olds leads to specific and abstract knowledge.Cognition,70, 109–135.
Gomez, R. L., &Schvaneveldt, R. W. (1994). What is learned from artificial grammars? Transfer tests of simple association.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,20, 396–410.
Kemler Nelson, D. G., Jusczyk, P. W., Mandel, D. R., Myers, J., Turk, A., &Gerken, L. A. (1995). The head-turn preference procedure for testing auditory perception.Infant Behavior & Development,18, 111–116.
Knowlton, B. J., &Squire, L. R. (1994). The information acquired during artificial grammar learning.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,20, 79–91.
Knowlton, B. J., &Squire, L. R. (1996). Artificial grammar learning depends on implicit acquisition of both abstract and exemplar-specific information.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning. Memory, & Cognition,22, 169–181.
Marcus, G. F., Vijayan, S., Bandi Rao, S., &Vishton, P. M. (1999). Rule learning by seven-month-old infants.Science,283, 77–80.
Mathews, R. C., Buss, R., Stanley, W. B., Blanchard-Fields, F., Cho, J. R., &Druhan, B. (1989). Role of implicit and explicit processes in learning from examples: A synergistic effect.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning. Memory. & Cognition,15, 1083–1100.
Mathews, R. C., &Roussel, L. G. (1997). Abstractness of implicit knowledge: A cognitive evolutionary perspective. In D. C. Berry (Ed.),How implicit is implicit learning? (pp. 13–47). New York: Oxford University Press.
Meulemans, T., &Van Der Linden, M. (1997a). Associative chunk strength in artificial grammar learning.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,23, 1007–1028.
Meulemans, T., &Van Der Linden, M. (1997b). Does the artificial grammar learning paradigm involve acquisition of complex information?Psychologica Belgica,37, 69–88.
Perruchet, P., &Pacteau, C. (1990). Synthetic grammar learning: Implicit rule abstraction or explicit fragmentary knowledge?Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,119, 264–275.
Reber, A. S. (1967). Implicit learning of artificial grammars.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,77, 317–327.
Reber, A. S. (1969). Transfer of syntactic structure in synthetic languages.Journal of Experimental Psychology,81, 115–119.
Reber, A. S., &Allen, R. (1978). Analogy and abstraction strategies in synthetic grammar learning: A functionalist interpretation.Cognition,6, 189–221.
Reber, A. S., &Lewis, S. (1977). Toward a theory of implicit learning: The analysis of the form and structure of a body of tacit knowledge.Cognition,5, 333–361.
Shanks, D. R., Johnstone, T., &Staggs, L. (1997). Abstraction processes in artificial grammar learning.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,50, 216–252.
Tunney, R. J., &Altmann, G. T. M. (1999). The transfer effect in artificial grammar learning: Re-appraising the evidence on the transfer of sequential dependencies.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,25, 1322–1333.
Vokey, J. R., & Higham, P. A. (1997, June). Abstract analogies and implicit abstraction of structure. Paper presented at the First Conference of the Association for the Scientific Study of Consciousness, Claremont, CA.
Whittlesea, B. W. A., &Dorken, M. D. (1993). Incidentally, things in general are particularly determined: An episodic-processing account of implicit learning.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,19, 227–248.
Whittlesea, B. W. A., &Wright, R. L. (1997). Implicit (and explicit) learning: Acting adaptively without knowing the consequences.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,23, 181–200.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This research was supported by NSF Postdoctoral Fellowship SBR-9633320 (to R.L.G.), NSF Grant SBR-9696072 (to L.A.G.), and US. Air Force Grant F41624-96-1 -0003 (to R.W.S.).
Electronic supplementary material
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gomez, R.L., Gerken, L. & Schvaneveldt, R.W. The basis of transfer in artificial grammar learning. Memory & Cognition 28, 253–263 (2000). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03213804
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03213804