Abstract
The present investigation is concerned with determining whether or not differences in the reaction times exist in a human subject’s responses to 6 different wavelengths equated at 5 levels of luminance. The heterochromatic matching was done by the method of flicker photometry and checked by the method of direct comparison. Simple reaction time, the time interval starting with the presentation of a visual stimulus and terminating in a manual response, was used as the method of determining the latencies for the establishment of equal sensory effects for the different wavelengths. Monocular viewing of the stimuli was used by two subjects and reaction times are determined over a luminance range of 5.2 log units around a central value of I millilambert. The results indicated that simple reaction time is inversely related to stimulus luminance. There were no differences in the reaction times to the different wavelengths at the four highest luminance levels; at the lowest luminance level, the wave-lengths fan out in a manner that is in line with the classical data of vision. In other words, the visual functions obtained with simple reaction time parallel certain well-known visual functions in intensity discrimination, flicker and visual acutty-the results may be accounted for by the Duplicity Theory of vision.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Brooke, R. T. The variation of critical fusion frequency with brightness at various retinal locations.J. Opt. Soc. Amer., 1951, 41, 1010–1016.
Chocholle, R. Variation des temps de reaction auditifs en fonction de l’intensité’ à diverses fréquences.Année psychol., 1940–41, 41–42, 65–124.
Chocholle, R. Etude de la psychophysiologie de l’audition par la méthode des temps de reaction.Année psychol., 1940–45, 45–46 90–131.
Greenbaum, H. B. Simple reaction time: A case study in signal detection. Thesis (Ph.D.), Columbia University, 1963. Microfilm or Xerox copy available from University Microfilms, Inc.: Ann Arbor, Michigan. Order No. 63-7421.
Hecht, S. Vision: II. The nature of the photoreceptor process. In C. Murchison (Ed.),Handbook of general experimental psychology. Worcester: Clark University Press, 1934.
Hecht, S. Rods, cones, and the chemical basis of vision.Physiol. Rev.. 1937, 17, 239–290.
Hecht, S., &Hsia, V. Dark adaptation following light adaptation to red and white lights.J. Opt. Soc. Amer., 1945, 35, 261–262.
Hecht, S., Peskin, J. C, &Patt, M. Intensity discrimination in the human eye. II. The relation between Al/I and intensity for different parts of the spectrum.J. gen. Physiol., 1938, 22, 7–19.
Hecht, S., &Slilaer, S. Intermittent stimulation by light. V. The relation between intensity and critical frequency for different parts of the spectrum.J. gen. Physiol., 1936, 19, 956–977.
Henmon, V. A. C. The time of perception as a measure of differences in sensations.Arch. Philos., Psychol.. & Sei. Me th., 1906, No. 8, 36–38.
Holmes, J. L. Reaction time to light as conditioned by wavelength and intensity. Unpublished thesis (Ph.D.), Columbia University, 1923.
Liang, T., &Pie’ron, H. Recherches sur la latence de la sensation lumineuse par la me’thode de l’effet chronoste’re’oscopique.Année psychol., 1947, 43–4, 1–53.
Lloyd, V. V. A comparison of critical fusion frequencies for different areas in the fovea and periphery.Amer. J. Psychol., 1952, 65, 346–357.
Nair, K. R. Table of confidence interval for the median in samples from any continuous population.Sankhyā, 1940, 4, 551–558.
Piéron, H. Le me’canisme d’apparation des couleurs subjectives de Fechner-Benham.Année psychol., 1923, 23, 1–49.
Piéron, H. La sensation chromatique. Données sur la latence propre et l’etablissement des sensations de couleur. Année psychol, 1932, 32, 1–29.
Piéron, H.The sensations: their functions, processes and mechanisms. Translated by M. H. Pirenne and B. C. Abbott. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1952.
Steinman, A. R. Reaction time to change compared with other psychophysical methods.Arch. Psychol, 1944, No. 292.
Stiles, W. S., &Crawford, B. H. Luminous efficiency of rays entering the eye pupil at different points.Proc. Roy. Soc, 1933, 112B, 428–450.
Walsh, J. W. T.Photometry. (3rd ed.) London: Constable and Company, Ltd., 1958.
Woodworth, R. S., &Schlosberg, H.Experimental psychology. (Rev. ed.) New York: Henry Holt and Company, 1954.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This document is Technical Report No. 38, of Contract No. 266(46), between Columbia University and the Office of Naval Research. The work is part of the program of Project No. 142-404. Reproduction in whole or in part is permitted for any purpose of the United States government. Support has also been provided by the Institutional Scientific Research Pool of Columbia University.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pollack, J.D. Reaction time to different wavelengths at various luminances. Perception & Psychophysics 3, 17–24 (1968). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03212706
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03212706