Abstract
Two experiments were conducted to investigate functional similarities between “hunger CRs” of Konorski’s (1967) model of appetitive classical conditioning and sign-tracking behavior in rats. Konorski’s model predicts that hunger CRs will be facilitated (1) when a nonrein-forced stimulus similar to the reinforced CS is introduced, and (2) when some CS presentations are unexpectedly nonreinforced. In Experiment 1, hungry rats acquired a leverpress response to a retractable lever that was paired with response-independent food. Following this training, a second lever was introduced whose presentation was not followed by food. The effect of the presence of this second lever was to facilitate responding to the original lever. In Experiment 2, single-lever autoshaping training was followed by a shift from 100% pairing of the lever with food to only 50% of the lever presentations being followed by food. The introduction of partial reinforcement produced an immediate and durable increase in leverpressing. The findings of both experiments are consistent with predictions from Konorski’s model of classical conditioning if sign-tracking is considered as a “hunger CR.”
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Reference Notes
Davey, G. C. L.Autoshaping in the rat: CS and US approach in three autoshaping procedures. Unpublished manuscript, 1977.
References
Boakes, R. A. Performance on learning to associate a stimulus with positive reinforcement. In H. Davies & H. M. B. Hurwitz (Eds.),Operant-Pavlovian interactions. Hillsdale, N.J: Erlbaum, 1977.
Boakes, B. A. Interaction between Type I and Type II processes involving positive reinforcement. In A. Dickinson & R. A. Boakes (Eds.),Mechanisms of learning and motivation: A memorial volume to Jerzy Konorski. Hillsdale, N.J: Erlbaum, 1979.
Brown, A., &Jenkins, H. M. Autoshaping of the pigeon’s key peck.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1968,11, 1–8.
Cleland, G. G., &Davey, G. C. L. The effect of satiation on sign-tracking and goal-tracking in the rat.IRCS Medical Science, 1981,9, 994–995. (Abstract)
Davey, G. C. L. Animal learning and conditioning. London: Macmillan, 1981.
Davey, G. C. L., Oakley, D., &Cleland, G. G. Autoshaping in the rat: Effects of omission on the form of the response.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1981,36, 75–91.
Davey, G. C. L., Phillips, S., &Cleland, G. G. The topography of signal-centred behaviour in the rat: The effects of solid and liquid food reinforcers.Behaviour Analysis Letters, 1981,1, 331–337.
Dickinson, A., &Boakes, R. A. (Eds.).Mechanisms of learning and motivation: A memorial volume to Jerzy Konorski. Hillsdale, N.J: Erlbaum, 1979.
Farwell, B. J., &Ayres, J. J. B. Stimulus-reinforcer and response-reinforcer relations in the control of conditioned appetitive headpoking (“goal-tracking”) in rats.Learning and Motivation, 1979,10, 295–312.
Gamzu, E., &Williams, D. R. Classical conditioning of a complex skeletal response.Science, 1971,171, 923–925.
Gibbon, J., Farrell, L., Locurto, C. M., Duncan, H. J., &Terrace, H. S. Partial reinforcement in autoshaping with pigeons.Animal Learning & Behavior, 1980,8, 45–59.
Hearst, E. Classical conditioning as the formation of interstimulus associations: Stimulus substitution, parasitic reinforcement and autoshaping. In A. Dickinson & R. A. Boakes (Eds.),Mechanisms of learning and motivation: A memorial volume to Jerzy Konorski. Hillsdale, N.J: Erlbaum, 1979.
Hearst, E., &Gormley, D. Some tests of the additivity (autoshaping) theory of behavioral contrast.Animal Learning & Behavior, 1976,4, 145–150.
Hearst, E., &Jenkins, H. M. Sign-tracking: The stimulus-reinforcer relation and directed action. Austin, Tex: Psychonomic Society, 1974.
Hogan, J. A. Responses in Pavlovian conditioning studies.Science, 1974,186, 156–157.
Holland, P. C. Influence of visual conditioned stimulus characteristics on the form of Pavlovian appetitive conditioned responses in rats.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 1980,6, 81–97.
Holland, P. C., &Rescorla, R. A. The effect of two ways of devaluing the unconditioned stimulus after first- and second-order appetitive conditioning.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 1975,1, 355–363.
Holland, P. C., &Straub, J. J. Differential effects of two ways of devaluing the unconditioned stimulus after Pavlovian appetitive conditioning.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 1979,5, 65–78.
Jenkins, H. M., Barrera, F. J., Ireland, C., &Woodside, B. Signal-centered action patterns in dogs in appetitive classical conditioning.Learning and Motivation, 1978,9, 272–296.
Konorski, J. Integrative activity of the brain. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1967.
Konorski, J. Classical and instrumental conditioning: The general laws of connections between “centers.”Acta Neurobiologicae Experimentalis, 1974,1, 5–14.
Page, E. B. Ordered hypotheses for multiple treatments: A significance test for linear ranks.Journal of the American Statistical Association, 1963,58, 216–230.
Pavlov, I. P. Conditioned reflexes. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1927.
Reynolds, G. S. Behavioral contrast.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1961,4, 57–71.
Schwartz, B., &Gamzu, E. Pavlovian control of operant behavior: An analysis of autoshaping and its implications for operant conditioning. In W. K. Honig & J. E. R. Staddon (Eds.),Handbook of operant behavior. Englewood Cliffs, N.J: Prentice-Hall, 1977.
Timberlake, W., &Grant, D. L. Autoshaping in rats to the presentation of another rat predicting food.Science, 1975,190, 690–692.
Wasserman, E. A. The effect of redundant contextual stimuli on autoshaping the pigeon’s key peck.Animal Learning & Behavior, 1973,1, 198–206.
Williams, D. R. Biconditional behavior: Conditioning without constraint. In C. M. Locurto, H. S. Terrace, & J. Gibbon (Eds.),Autoshaping and conditioning theory. New York: Academic Press, 1980.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Davey, G.C.L., Cleland, G.G. & Oakley, D.A. Applying Konorski’s model of classical conditioning to signal-centered behavior in the rat: Some functional similarities between hunger CRs and sign-tracking. Animal Learning & Behavior 10, 257–262 (1982). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03212279
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03212279