Abstract
In two experiments, resistance to satiation was compared with resistance to extinction. In Experiment 1, rats given initial trials in a straight-alley runway while satiated failed to show increased resistance to satiation in a later test phase. This negative finding contrasts with the increased resistance to extinction usually found following initial nonrewarded trials in a straight alley. In Experiment 2, rats were extinguished or were run while satiated following deprived acquisition, and then were either shifted to the other condition or maintained under the same condition. A greater response decrement was produced by extinction than by satiation, both when current performance was examined and when the persistent effect of satiation or extinction on later performance was examined. These results show that there are important dissimilarities in the effects of satiation and extinction, dissimilarities that suggest that extinction is more nonrewarding or aversive than satiation. It seems likely that extinction involves processes (such as frustration, arousal of aversive motivation, and conditioned inhibition) not involved in satiation, which account for the greater response decrement in extinction as compared with satiation.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allport, G. W. Personality. New York: Holt, 1937.
Amsel, A. The role of frustrative nonreward in noncontinuous reward situations.Psychological Bulletin, 1958,55, 102–119.
Black, R. W., &Cox, M. Extinction of an instrumental running response in rats in the absence of frustration and nonreinforcement.Psychological Record, 1973,23, 101–109.
Bolles, R. C. Theory of motivation (2nd ed.). New York: Harper & Row, 1975.
Capaldi, E. D., Davidson, T. L., & Myers, D. E. Resistance to satiation: Reinforcing effects of food and eating under satiation.Learning and Motivation, in press.
Capaldi, E. D., &Myers, D. E. Resistance to satiation of consummatory and instrumental performance.Learning and Motivation, 1978,9, 179–201.
Capaldi, E. D., &Myers, D. E. Resistance to satiation as a function of three different satiation procedures.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 1979,14, 53–56.
Capaldi, E. J., &Haggbloom, S. J. Influence of reward magnitude on the initial nonreward effect.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 1974,3, 219–221.
Cox, W. M. Eight drive-reward combinations: A test of incentive motivational theory.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 1976,7, 121–124.
Cravens, R. W., &Renner, K. E. Conditioned appetitive drive states: Empirical evidence and theoretical status.Psychological Bulletin, 1970,73, 212–220.
Daly, H. B. Reinforcing properties of escape from frustration aroused in various learning situations. In G. H. Bower (Ed.),The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 8). New York: Academic Press, 1974.
Dickinson, A., &Bearing, M. F. Appetitive-aversive interactions and inhibitory processes. In A. Dickinson & R. A. Boakes (Eds.),Mechanisms of learning and motivation: A memorial volume to Jerzy Konorski. Hillsdale, N.J: Erlbaum, 1979.
Hull, C. L. Principles of behavior. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1943.
Konorski, J. Integrative activity of the brain: An interdisciplinary approach. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1967.
Mandler, G. The interruption of behavior. In D. Levine (Ed.),Nebraska Symposium on Motivation. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1964.
Morgan, M. J. Resistance to satiation.Animal Behaviour, 1974,22, 449–466.
Morris, R. G. M., Einon, D. F., &Morgan, M. J. Persistent behavior in extinction after partial deprivation in training.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1976,28, 633–642.
Robbins, D., Chait, H., &Weinstock, S. Effects of nonreinforcement on running behavior during acquisition, extinction, and reacquisition.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1968,66, 699–706.
Seward, J. P., Shea, R. A., &Elkind, D. Evidence for the interaction of drive and reward.American Journal of Psychology, 1958,71, 404–407.
Spear, N. E., Hill, W. F., &O’Sullivan, D. J. Acquisition and extinction after initial trials without reward.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1965,69, 24–29.
Spear, N. E., &Spitzner, J. H. Effect of initial nonrewarded trials: Factors responsible for increased resistance to extinction.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1967,74, 525–537.
Webb, W. B. Responses in the absence of the acquisition motive.Psychological Review, 1952,59, 54–61.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Experiment 2 is based on a thesis by the second author submitted in December 1977 to the Graduate School of Purdue University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Master of Science degree.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Capaldi, E.D., Myers, D.E. & Davidson, T.L. A comparison of resistance to satiation and resistance to extinction. Animal Learning & Behavior 9, 108–114 (1981). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03212032
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03212032