Abstract
A recent debate has concerned whether classical bistable configurations (e.g., duck/rabbit) can be reinterpreted using mental imagery. Research in this field indicates that image reversal is possible only when subjects change their specification of orientation. In a series of four experiments, we demonstrate that mental reversal of classical bistable configurations( CBCs) is impeded by verbally recoding the visual pattern at the time of input. When subjects were prevented from verbally recoding visual stimuli in short-term memory, they fared systematically better in mentally reversing the CBC, even when they received no instructions to change their reference frame or specification of orientation. On this basis, we suggest a model of image reversal that takes into account the interaction between memory codes and provides a new perspective on verbal recoding, verbal overshadowing, and mental discoveries.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baddeley, A. D. (1986).Working memory. Oxford: Clarendon.
Baddeley, A. D., &Hitch, J. G. (1974). Working memory. In G. H. Bower (Ed.),The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 8, pp. 47–90). New York: Academic Press.
Bahrick, H. P., &Boucher, P. (1968). Retention of visual and verbal codes of the same stimuli.Journal of Experimental Psychology,78, 417–422.
Boring, E. G. (1930). A new ambiguous figure.American Journal of Psychology,42, 444–445.
Brandimonte, M. A., Hitch, G. J., &Bishop, D. V. M. (1992a). Influence of short-term memory codes on visual image processing: Evidence from image transformation tasks.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,18, 157–165.
Brandimonte, M. A., Hitch, G. J., &Bishop, D. V. M. (1992b). Verbal recoding of visual stimuli impairs mental image transformations.Memory & Cognition,20, 449–455.
Brandimonte, M. A., Hitch, G. J., &Bishop, D. V. M. (1992c). Manipulation of visual mental images in children and adults.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology,53, 300–312.
Bugelski, B. R., &Alampay, D. A. (1961). The role of frequency in developing perceptual set.Canadian Journal of Psychology,15, 205–211.
Carmichael, L., Hogan, H. P., &Walter, A. A. (1932), An experimental study of the effect of language on the reproduction of visually perceived forms.Journal of Experimental Psychology,15, 73–86.
Chambers, D., &Reisberg, D. (1985). Can mental imagesbe ambiguous?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,3, 317–328.
Chambers, D., &Reisberg, D. (1992). What an image depicts depends on what an image means.Cognitive Psychology,24, 165–176.
Finke, R. A. (1989).Principles of mental imagery. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Finke, R. A. (1990).Creative imagery. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Finke, R. A., Pinker, S., &Farah, M. (1989). Reinterpreting visual patterns in mental imagery.Cognitive Science,13, 51–78.
Girgus, J. J., Rock, I., &Egatz, R. (1977). The effect of knowledge of reversibility on the reversibility of ambiguous figures.Perception & Psychophysics,22, 550–556.
Hitch, G. J., Halliday, S., Schafstaal, A. M., &Schraagen, J. M. C. (1988). Visual working memory in young children.Memory & Cognition,16, 120–132.
Hitch, G. J., Woodin, M. E., &Baker, S. (1989). Visual and phonological components of working memory in children.Memory & Cognition,17, 175–185.
Hyman, I. E., &Neisser, U. (1991).Reconstruing mental images: Problems of method (Emory Cognition Project Rep. No. 19). Atlanta: Emory University.
Jastrow, J. (1900).Fact and fable in psychology. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Kosslyn, S. M. (1980).Image and mind. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Kosslyn, S. M., Brunn, J., Cave, K. R., &Wallach, R. W. (1984). Individual differences in mental imagery ability: Acomputational analysis.Cognition,18, 195–243.
Kosslyn, S. M., Holtzman, J. D., Farah, M. J., &Gazzaniga, M. S. (1985). A computational analysis of mental image generation: Evidence from functional dissociations in split-brain patients.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,114, 311–341.
Murray, D. J. (1968). Articulation and acoustic confusability in short-term memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology,78, 679–684.
Nelson, D. L., &Brooks, D. H. (1973). Functional independence of pictures and their verbal memory codes.Journal of Experimental Psychology,98, 44–46.
Paivio, A. (1971).Imagery and verbal processes. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Paivio, A. (1975). Imagery and long-term memory. In A. Kennedy & A. Wilkes (Eds.),Studies in long-term memory (pp. 57–85). New York: Wiley.
Peterson, M. A., &Hochberg, J. (1983). Opposed-set measurement procedure: A quantitative analysis of the role of local cues and intention in form perception.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,2, 183–193.
Peterson, M. A., Kihlstrom, J. F., Rose, P. M., &Glisky, M. L. (1992). Mental images can be ambiguous: Reconstrual and reference-frame reversals.Memory & Cognition,20, 107–123.
Posner, M. J. (1969). Abstraction and the process of recognition. In G. H. Bower & J. T. Spence (Eds.),The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 3, pp. 63–100). New York: Academic Press.
Posner, M. I., Boies, S. J., Eichelman, W. H., &Taylor, R. L. (1969). Retention of visual and name codes of single letters.Journal of Experimental Psychology Monographs,79, 1–16.
Reisberg, D., &Chambers, D. (1991). Neither pictures nor propositions: What can we learn from a mental image?Canadian Journal of Psychology,45, 336–352.
Reisberg, D., Smith, D. J., Baxter, D. A., &Sonenshine, M. (1989). “Enacted” auditory images are ambiguous. “pure” auditory images are not.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,3, 619–641.
Rock, I. (1983).The logic of perception. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Schooler, J. W., &Engstler-Schooler, T. Y. (1990). Verbal over-shadowing of visual memories: Some things are better left unsaid.Cognitive Psychology,22, 36–71.
Slowiaczek, M. L., &Clifton, C. (1980). Subvocalization and reading for meaning.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,19, 573–582.
Tsal, Y., &Kolbet, L. (1985). Disambiguating ambiguous figures by selective attention.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology.37A, 25–37.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Part of this research was supported by NATO Grant SRG 9111031 to W. G. and Graham Hitch and CNR Grant 90.03517.CTO8 to W. G.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Brandimonte, M.A., Gerbino, W. Mental image reversal and verbal recoding: When ducks become rabbits. Memory & Cognition 21, 23–33 (1993). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03211161
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03211161