Abstract
Large and systematic changes in response rates often occur within sessions during operant conditioning procedures. In the present experiment, we asked whether the value of the reinforcer that supports responding also changes within sessions. Pigeons pecked a key for mixed grain available throughout the session. Occasionally, wheat was also provided for pecking a second key. The ratio of the rates of responding for mixed grain and wheat, a frequently used measure of relative reinforcer value, changed significantly within sessions when mixed grain was provided at high, but not at low, rates. Habituation to the reinforcer provides the most likely explanation for these changes in reinforcer value. Eventually, habituation may provide a unified explanation for the within-session changes in behavior that occur when many species of subjects respond on a wide variety of tasks.
Article PDF
References
Baum, W. M. (1974). On two types of deviation from the matching law: Bias and undermatching.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior,22, 231–242.
Cannon, C. B., &McSweeney, F. K. (1995). Within-session changes in responding when rate and duration of reinforcement vary.Behavioural Processes,34, 285–292.
Fleshler, M., &Hoffman, H. S. (1962). A progression for generating variable-interval schedules.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior,5, 529–530.
Herrnstein, R. J. (1970). On the law of effect.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior,13, 243–266.
Hinson, J. M., &Staddon, J. E. R. (1983). Hill-climbing by pigeons.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior,39, 25–47.
Hodos, W., &Bonbright, J. C., Jr. (1972). The detection of visual intensity differences by pigeons.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior,18, 471–479.
Lubow, R. E. (1965). Latent inhibition: Effects of frequency of nonreinforced preexposure of the CS.Journal of Comparative & Physiological Psychology,60, 454–457.
Mackworth, J. F. (1968). Vigilance, arousal and habituation.Psychological Review,75, 308–322.
McSweeney, F. K. (1992). Rate of reinforcement and session duration as determinants of within-session patterns of responding.Animal Learning & Behavior,20, 160–169.
McSweeney, F. K., &Hinson, J. M. (1992). Patterns of responding within sessions.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior,58, 19–36.
McSweeney, F. K.,Hinson, J. M., &Cannon, C. B. (in press). Sensitization-habituation may occur during operant conditioning.Psychological Bulletin.
McSweeney, F. K., &Johnson, K. S. (1994). The effect of time between sessions on within-session patterns of responding.Behavioural Processes,31, 207–218.
McSweeney, F. K., &Roll, J. M. (1993). Responding changes systematically within sessions during conditioning procedures.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior,60, 621–640.
Miller, H. L., Jr. (1976). Matching-based hedonic scaling in the pigeon.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior,26, 335–347.
Montgomery, K. C. (1953). The effect of activity deprivation upon exploratory behavior.Journal of Comparative & Physiological Psychology,46, 438–441.
Papini, M. R., &Overmier, J. B. (1985). Partial reinforcement and autoshaping of the pigeon’s key-peck behavior.Learning & Motivation,16, 109–123.
Rachlin, H., &Krasnoff, J. (1983). Eating and drinking: An economic analysis.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior,39, 385–404.
Roll, J. M., McSweeney, F. K., Johnson, K. S., &Weatherly, J. N. (1995). Satiety contributes little to within-session decreases in responding.Learning & Motivation,26, 323–341.
Rolls, B. J., Rolls, E. T., Rowe, E. A., &Sweeney, K. (1981). Sensory specific satiety in man.Physiology & Behavior,27, 137–142.
Schoenfeld, W. N., Antonitis, J. J., &Bersh, P. J. (1950). Unconditioned response rate of the white rat in a barpressing apparatus.Journal of Comparative & Physiological Psychology,43, 41–48.
Swithers, S. E., &Hall, W. G. (1994). Does oral experience terminate ingestion?Appetite,23, 113–138.
Thompson, R. F., &Spencer, W. A. (1966). Habituation: A model phenomenon for the study of neuronal substrates of behavior.Psychological Review,73, 16–43.
Weatherly, J. N., McSweeney, F. K., &Swindell, S. (1995). On the contributions of responding and reinforcement to within-session patterns of responding.Learning & Motivation,26, 421–432.
Williams, B. A., &Royalty, P. (1989). A test of the melioration theory of matching.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,15, 99–113.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
F.K.M., J.N.W., and S.S. thank Cari B. Cannon for her comments on an earlier version of this manuscript. This material is based on work supported by the NSF (IBN-9403719). The treatment of the subjects was in accordance with institutional guidelines.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
McSweeney, F.K., Weatherly, J.N. & Swindell, S. Reinforcer value may change within experimental sessions. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 3, 372–375 (1996). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03210763
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03210763