Abstract
Psychologie Expérimentale, 28 rue Serpente, 75006 Paris, France. Current models of word recognition generally assume that word units orthographically similar to a stimulus word are involved in the visual recognition of this word. We refer to this set of orthographically similar words as an orthographic neighborhood. Two experiments are presented that investigate the ways in which the composition of this neighborhood can affect word recognition. The data indicate that the presence in the neighborhood of at least one unit of higher frequency than the stimulus word itself results in interference in stimulus word processing. Lexical decision latencies (Experiment 1) and gaze durations (Experiment 2) to words with one neighbor of higher frequency were significantly longer than to words without a more frequent neighbor.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Balota, D. A., &Chumbley, J. I. (1984) Are lexical decisions a good measure of lexical access? The role of word frequency in the neglected decision stage.Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Percep non & Performance,10, 340–357
Barbin, Y. (1982). “Cybermétrope”.Un système analogique de traitement du signal pour l’étude en temps réel des mouvements oculaires horizontaux dans des contextes déclairement ambiants variés. Paris University of Paris D.E A. Electronique Instrumentation.
Beauvillain, C., &Grainger, J. (1987). Accessing interlexical homographs: Some limits of a language-selective access.Journal of Memory & Language,26, 658–672.
Becker, C. A. (1976). Allocation of attention during visual word recognition.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,2, 555–566.
Brown, G. D. A. (1987). Resolving inconsistency: A computational model of word naming.Journal of Memory & Language,26, 1–23.
Chambers, S. M. (1979). Letter and order information in lexical access.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,18, 225–241.
Coltheart, M., Davelaar, E., Jonasson, J. T., &Besner, D. (1977) Access to the internal lexicon. In S. Domic (Ed.),Attention and performance VI (pp. 535–555). New York: Academic Press.
Forster, K. I. (1976). Accessing the mental lexicon. In R. J. Wales & E. W. Walker (Eds.),New approaches to language mechanisms (pp. 257–287). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Gernsbacher, M. A. (1984). Resolving 20 years of inconsistent interactions between lexical familiarity and orthography, concreteness, and polysemy.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,113, 256–281.
Gordon, B. (1985). Subjective frequency and the lexical decision latency function: Implications for mechanisms of lexical access.Journal of Memory & Language,24, 631–645.
Grainger, J. (1989). How monolingual can a bilingual be: Interlexical interference in bilingual word recognition Manuscript submitted for publication.
Grainger, J., &Beauvillain, C (1987). Language blocking and lexical access in bilinguals.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,39A, 295–319.
Gunther, H., &Greese, B. (1985). Lexical hermits and the pronunciation of visually presented words.Forschungsberichte des Instituts für Phonetik und Sprachliche Kommunikation des Universität München,21, 25–52.
Havens, L. L., &Foote, W. E. (1963). The effect of competition on visual duration threshold and its independence of stimulus frequency.Journal of Experimental Psychology,65, 6–11.
Holmes, V., &O’regan, J. K. (1987). Decomposing French words. In J. K. O’Regan & A. Lévy-Schoen (Eds.),Eye movements: From physiology to cognition (pp. 459–466). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Humphreys, G. W., Evett, L. J., Quinlan, P. T., &Besner, D. (1987). Orthographic priming: Qualitative differences between priming from identified and unidentified primes. In M. Coltheart (Ed.),Attention and performance XII: The psychology of reading (pp. 105–125). New York: Erlbaum.
Mcclelland, J. L., &Rumelhart, D. E. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Part 1 An account of basic findings.Psychological Review,88, 375–405.
Morton, J. (1970). A functional model for memory. In D. A. Norman (Ed.),Models of human memory (pp. 203–254). New York: Academic Press.
Neely, J. H. (1977). Semantic priming and retrieval from lexical memory: Roles of inhibitionless spreading activation and limited capacity attention.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,106, 226–254.
Norrjs, D. G. (1986). Word recognition: Context effects without priming.Cognition,22, 93–136.
O’regan, J. K., &Lévy-Schoen, A. (1987). Eye movement strategy and tactics in word recognition and reading. In M. Coltheart (Ed.),Attention and Performance XII: The psychology of reading (pp. 363–383) New York: Erlbaum.
O’regan, J. K., Lévy-Schoen, A., &Jacobs, A. M. (1983). The effect of visibility on eye movement parameters in reading.Perception & Psychophysics,34, 121–138.
O’regan, J. K., Pynte, J., Lévy-Schoen, A., &Brugaillère, B. (1984). Convenient fixation location within isolated words of different length and structure.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,10, 250–257.
Paap, K. R., Newsome, S. L., Mcdonald, J. E., &Schvaneveldt, R. W. (1982). An activation-verification model for letter and word recognition. The word superiority effect.Psychological Review,89, 573–594.
Savin, H. B. (1963). Word frequency effects and errors in the perception of speech.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,35, 200–206
Scheerer, E. (1987). Visual word recognition in German. In D. A. Auport, D. Mackay, W. Prinz, & E. Scheerer (Eds.),Language perception and production: Shared mechanisms in listening, speaking, reading and writing (pp. 227–244). London: Academic Press.
Trésor De La Langue Française. (1971). Nancy, France: C.N.R.S.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This neighborhood frequency effect is discussed in terms of the different types of candidate selection process postulated by contemporary models of visual word recognition.
This research was partly supported by postdoctoral fellowships from the Fyssen Foundation, Paris, awarded to the first and third authors.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Grainger, J., O’regan, J.K., Jacobs, A.M. et al. On the role of competing word units in visual word recognition: The neighborhood frequency effect. Perception & Psychophysics 45, 189–195 (1989). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03210696
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03210696