Abstract
In four experiments, listeners’ sensitivity to combinations of pitch and duration was investigated. Experiments 1–3 involved “textures” of notes, which were created by repeatedly sounding one of two notes (e.g., C4 quarter note; D4 eighth note), so that each note had an equal chance of occurring at any point within a texture. Experiment 1 showed that if a texture change was effected by introducing a pitch or duration that was not in the initial texture, the change was perceived by both attentive and distracted listeners. If a texture change was effected by combining the pitch of one note with the duration of the other note in the initial texture, and vice versa, it was perceived only if the listeners were attentive. Sensitivity to pitch/duration combinations was poorer when the pitch difference between component notes of textures was increased (Experiment 2), but it was better when the difference in duration between component notes was increased (Experiment 3). In Experiment 4, listeners’ sensitivity to combinations of pitch pattern and durational pattern in brief sequences was examined. Listeners were sensitive to the manner in which parameter patterns were combined when they were attentive, but not when they were distracted. The results are discussed in view of featureintegration theory and its application to music cognition.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Boltz, M., &Jones, M. R. (1986). Does rule recursion make melodies easier to reproduce? If not, what does?Cognitive Psychology,18, 389–431.
Briand, K. A., &Klein, R. M. (1989). Has feature integration theory come unglued? A reply to Tsal.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,15, 401–406.
Butler, D. (1979). A further study of melodic channeling.Perception & Psychophysics,25, 264–268.
Cohen, A., &Ivry, R. (1989). Illusory conjunctions inside and outside the focus of attention.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,15, 650–663.
Cohen, A. J. (1991). Tonality and perception: Musical scales primed by excerpts from The Well-Tempered Clavier of J. S. Bach.Psychological Research,53, 305–314.
Cuddy, L. L., &Thompson, W. F. (1992). Asymmetry of perceived key movement in chorale sequences: Converging evidence from a probe-tone analysis.Psychological Research,54, 51–59.
Desain, P. (1992). A (de)composable theory of rhythm perception.Music Perception,9, 439–454.
Deutsch, D. (1975). Two-channel listening to musical scales.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,57, 1156–1160.
Deutsch, D. (1980). The processing of structured and unstructured tonal sequences.Perception & Psychophysics,28, 381–389.
Fletcher, N. H., &Rossing, T. D. (1991).The physics of musical instruments. New York: Springer-Verlag.
Gabrielsson, A. (1973a). Similarity ratings and dimension analyses of auditory rhythm patterns: I.Scandinavian Journal of Psychology,14, 138–160.
Gabrielsson, A. (1973b). Similarity ratings and dimension analyses of auditory rhythm patterns: II.Scandinavian Journal of Psychology,14, 161–176.
Garner, W. R. (1974).The processing of information and structure. Potomac, MD: Erlbaum.
Garner, W. R., &Felfoldy, G. L. (1970). Integrality of stimulus dimensions in various types of information processing.Cognitive Psychology,1, 225–241.
Hall, M. D., & Pastore, R. E. (1993, November). An auditory analogue to feature integration. Poster presented at the meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Washington, DC.
Ivry, R. B., &Prinzmetal, W. (1991). Effect of feature similarity on illusory conjunctions.Perception & Psychophysics,49, 105–116.
Jones, M. R. (1987). Dynamic pattern structure in music: Recent theory and research.Perception & Psychophysics,41, 621–634.
Jones, M. R., Boltz, M., &Kidd, G. (1982). Controlled attending as a function of melodic and temporal context.Perception & Psychophysics,32, 211–218.
Krumhansl, C. L. (1990).Cognitive foundations of musical pitch. New York: Oxford University Press.
Krumhansl, C. L. (1991). Memory for musical surface.Memory & Cognition,19, 401–411.
Krumhansl, C. L., &Iverson, P. (1992). Perceptual interactions between musical pitch and timbre.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,18, 739–751.
Livingstone, M. S., &Hubel, D. H. (1987). Psychophysical evidence for separate channels for the perception of form, color, motion and depth.Journal of Neuroscience,7, 3416–3468.
Longuet-Higgins, H. C., &Lee, C. S. (1982). The perception of musical rhythms.Perception,11, 115–128.
Melara, R. D., &Marks, L. E. (1990a). HARD and SOFT interacting dimensions: Differential effects of dual context on classification.Perception & Psychophysics,47, 307–325.
Melara, R. D., &Marks, L. E. (1990b). Interaction among auditory dimensions: Timbre, pitch, and loudness.Perception & Psychophysics,48, 169–178.
Melara, R. D., &Marks, L. E. (1990c). Perceptual primacy of dimensions: Support for a model of dimensional interaction.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,16, 398–414.
Monohan, C. B., &Carterette, E. C. (1985). Pitch and duration as determinants of musical space.Music Perception,3, 1–32.
Narmour, E. (1990).The analysis and cognition of basic melodic structures: The implication realization model. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Palmer, C., &Krumhansl, C. L. (1987a). Independent temporal and pitch structures in determination of musical phrases.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,13, 116–126.
Palmer, C., &Krumhansl, C. L. (1987b). Pitch and temporal contributions to musical phrase perception: Effects of harmony, performance timing, and familiarity.Perception & Psychophysics,41, 505–518.
Peretz, I., &Kolinsky, R. (1993). Boundaries of separability between melody and rhythm in music discrimination: A neuropsychological perspective.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,46A, 301–325.
Peretz, I., &Morais, J. (1989). Music and modularity.Contemporary Music Review,4, 279–293.
Thompson, W. F., &Mor, S. (1992). A perceptual investigation of polytonality.Psychological Research,54, 60–71.
Thompson, W. F., &Sinclair, D. (1993). Pitch pattern, durational pattern, and timbre: A study of the perceptual integration of auditory qualities.Psychomusicology,12, 29–47.
Treisman, A. (1986). Properties, parts, and objects. In K. R. Boff, L. Kaufman, & J. P. Thomas (Eds.),Handbook of perception and human performance: Vol. II. Cognitive processes and performance (pp. 35/1–35/70). Chichester, U.K.: Wiley.
Treisman, A. (1991). Search, similarity, and integration of features between and within dimensions.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,17, 652–676.
Treisman, A., &Gelade, G. (1980). A feature-integration theory of attention.Cognitive Psychology,12, 97–136.
Treisman, A., &Sato, S. (1990). Conjunction search revisited.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,16, 459–478.
Treisman, A., &Schmidt, N. (1982). Illusory conjunctions in the perception of objects.Cognitive Psychology,14, 107–141.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This research was supported by an operating grant from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Thompson, W.F. Sensitivity to combinations of musical parameters: Pitch with duration, and pitch pattern with durational pattern. Perception & Psychophysics 56, 363–374 (1994). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03209770
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03209770