Abstract
Results from previous visual search studies have suggested that abrupt onsets produce involuntary shifts of attention (i.e., attentional capture), but discontinuities in simple features such as color and brightness do not (Jonides & Yantis, 1988). In the present study we tested whether feature discontinuities (i.e., “singletons”) can produce attentional capture in a visual search task if defined “locally” or over a small spatial range. On each trial, a variable number of letters appeared, one of which differed from the others in color or intensity. The location of this singleton was uncorrelated with target location. Local discontinuities were created by embedding the letters in a dot texture. In Experiment 1, display size effects for singleton targets were not reduced with the addition of a background dot texture. Similar results were obtained in Experiment 2, regardless of variations in texture density. Experiment 3 confirmed that when targets are defined by a color or intensity singleton, they are detected preattentively, and that increasing texture density yields faster detection. We conclude that the spatial range over which feature discontinuities are defined may influence the guidance of spatial attention, but it has no influence on their ability to capture attention.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bacon, W., &Egeth, H. (1991). Local processes in preattentive feature detection.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,17, 77–90.
Bacon, W., &Egeth, H. (1994). Overriding stimulus-driven attentional capture.Perception & Psychophysics,55, 485–496.
Beck, J., Prazdny, K., &Rosenfeld, A. (1983). A theory of textural segmentation. In J. Beck, B. Hope, & A. Rosenfeld (Eds.),Human and machine vision (pp. 1–38). London: Academic Press.
Bergen, J. R., &Julesz, B. (1983). Parallel versus serial processing in rapid pattern detection.Nature,303, 696–698.
Bravo, M. J., &Nakayama, K. (1992). The role of attention in different visual-search tasks.Perception & Psychophysics,51, 465–472.
Cave, K. R., &Wolfe, J. M. (1990). Modelling the role of parallel processing in visual search.Cognitive Psychology,22, 225–271.
Connor, J. M. (1972). Effects of increased processing load on parallel processing of visual displays.Perception & Psychophysics,12, 121–128.
Duncan, J., &Humphreys, G. W. (1989). Visual search and stimulus similarity.Psychological Review,96, 433–458.
Egeth, H., Jonides, J., &Wall, S. (1972). Parallel processing of multielement displays.Cognitive Psychology,3, 647–698.
Folk, C. L., &Egeth, H. (1989). Does the identification of simple features require serial processing?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,15, 97–110.
Folk, C. L., Remington, R. W., &Johnston, J. C. (1992). Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,18, 1030–1044.
Folk, C. L., Remington, R. W., &Johnston, J. C. (1993). Contingent attentional capture: A reply to Yantis (1993).Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,19, 682–685.
Folk, C. L., Remington, R. W., &Wright, J. H. (1994). The structure of attentional control: Contingent attentional capture by apparent motion, abrupt onset, and color.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,20, 317–329.
Jonides, J., &Yantis, S. (1988). Uniqueness of abrupt visual onset in capturing attention.Perception & Psychophysics,43, 346–354.
Julesz, B. (1986). Texton gradients: The texton theory revisited.Biological Cybernetics,54, 245–251.
Kahneman, D., &Henik, A. (1981). Perceptual organization and attention. In M. Kubovy & J. R. Pomerantz (Eds.),Perceptual organization (pp. 181–211). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Koch, C., &Ullman, S. (1985). Shifts in selective visual attention: Toward the underlying neural circuitry.Human Neurobiology,4, 219–227.
Neisser, U. (1967).Cognitive psychology. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Nothdurft, H.-C. (1985). Sensitivity for structure gradient in texture discrimination tasks.Vision Research,25, 1957–1968.
Nothdurft, H.-C. (1992). Feature analysis and the role of similarity in preattentive vision.Perception & Psychophysics,52, 355–375.
Pashler, H. (1988). Cross-dimensional interaction and texture segregation.Perception & Psychophysics,43, 307–318.
Sagi, D., &Julesz, B. (1987). Short-range limitation on detection of feature differences.Spatial Vision,2, 39–49.
Theeuwes, J. (1990). Perceptual selectivity is task-dependent: Evidence from selective search.Acta Psychologica,74, 81–99.
Theeuwes, J. (1991). Cross-dimensional perceptual selectivity.Perception & Psychophysics,50, 184–193.
Theeuwes, J. (1992). Perceptual selectivity for color and form.Perception & Psychophysics,51, 599–606.
Todd, S., & Kramer, A. (in press). Attentional misguidance in visual search.Perception & Psychophysics.
Treisman, A., &Gelade, G. (1980). A feature integration theory of attention.Cognitive Psychology,12, 97–136.
Treisman, A., &Souther, J. (1985). Search asymmetry: A diagnostic for preattentive processing of separable features.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,114, 285–310.
Ullman, S. (1984). Visual routines.Cognition,18, 97–159.
Wolfe, J. (1992, November).Guided search 2.0: A revised model of visual search. Paper presented at the meeting of the Psychonomic Society, St. Louis, MO.
Wolfe, J. M., Cave, K. R., &Franzel, S. L. (1989). Guided search: An alternative to the feature integration model for visual search.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,15, 419–433.
Yantis, S. (1993). Stimulus-driven attentional capture and attentional control settings.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,19, 676–681.
Yantis, S., &Hillstrom, A. P. (1994). Stimulus-driven attentional capture: Evidence from equiluminant visual objects.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,20, 95–107.
Yantis, S., &Johnson, D. N. (1990). Mechanisms of attentional priority.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,16, 812–825.
Yantis, S., &Jones, E. (1991). Mechanisms of attentional selection: Temporally modulated priority tags.Perception & Psychophysics,50, 166–178.
Yantis, S., &Jonides, J. (1984). Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: Evidence from visual search.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,10, 601–621.
Yantis, S., &Jonides, J. (1990). Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: Voluntary versus automatic allocation.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,16, 121–134.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This research was supported in part by National Institute of Mental Health Grant 1 RO3 MH 45008 to C.L.F. Experiment 1 was presented at the meeting of the Eastern Psychological Association, March 1990. Experiment 2 was based on the master’s thesis of the second author, submitted to Villanova University.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Folk, C.L., Annett, S. Do locally defined feature discontinuities capture attention?. Perception & Psychophysics 56, 277–287 (1994). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03209762
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03209762